User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
eas
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by djaco

P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1
 
majech
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by eas
Originally posted by djaco


P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1


Not necessarily, I've seen some PRETTY BAD L40 builds...
 
djaco
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by majech
Originally posted by eas

Originally posted by djaco



P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1


Not necessarily, I've seen some PRETTY BAD L40 builds...


Bad recruiting then still his fault
 
Link
 
Wow I think we need a special ed league for Boltz, I keep getting more dumb everytime I read his posts.......
 
eas
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by majech
Originally posted by eas

Originally posted by djaco



P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1


Not necessarily, I've seen some PRETTY BAD L40 builds...


my lvl 40 TE lvl 37 WR are on Boltz team

WR lvl 37

Strength:41.78 Blocking:11
Speed:95.27 Tackling:8
Agility:42.55 Throwing:10
Jumping:36.27 Catching:53.5
Stamina:43.73 Carrying:51.09
Vision:36.11 Kicking:9
Confidence:26.34 Punting:10

route run 1
sticky hands 1
first step 2
quick cut 2
head fake 1
spin 1

pretty good

BOLTZ sucks as an owner
and with his O# settings and tactics
Last edited Jan 13, 2009 13:47:48
 
djaco
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by eas
Originally posted by majech

Originally posted by eas


Originally posted by djaco




P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1


Not necessarily, I've seen some PRETTY BAD L40 builds...


my lvl 40 TE lvl 37 WR are on Boltz team

WR lvl 37

Strength:41.78 Blocking:11
Speed:95.27 Tackling:8
Agility:42.55 Throwing:10
Jumping:36.27 Catching:53.5
Stamina:43.73 Carrying:51.09
Vision:36.11 Kicking:9
Confidence:26.34 Punting:10

route run 1
sticky hands 1
first step 2
quick cut 2
head fake 1
spin 1

pretty good

BOLTZ sucks as an owner
and with his O# settings and tactics


Yeah that's not bad at all. So it goes back to coaching Good luck to you the rest of the season man.
 
Banned
offline
Link
 
i do suck as an owner yeah...i aint very nice..but i do have a winning record and they arent my tactics their ones from good gm's so...
 
sonicdude47
offline
Link
 
Lol if we had signatures in these forums that what I would put on it LOL
 
djaco
offline
Link
 
lol
 
majech
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by eas


pretty good


It is?
 
eas
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by djaco
Originally posted by eas

Originally posted by majech


Originally posted by eas



Originally posted by djaco





P.S. If you have players that are lvl 40 and you are still losing then that's bad coaching so I wouldn't be bragging bro.



+1


Not necessarily, I've seen some PRETTY BAD L40 builds...


my lvl 40 TE lvl 37 WR are on Boltz team

WR lvl 37

Strength:41.78 Blocking:11
Speed:95.27 Tackling:8
Agility:42.55 Throwing:10
Jumping:36.27 Catching:53.5
Stamina:43.73 Carrying:51.09
Vision:36.11 Kicking:9
Confidence:26.34 Punting:10

route run 1
sticky hands 1
first step 2
quick cut 2
head fake 1
spin 1

pretty good

BOLTZ sucks as an owner
and with his O# settings and tactics


Yeah that's not bad at all. So it goes back to coaching Good luck to you the rest of the season man.


thanks
Last edited Jan 14, 2009 11:57:00
 
Ocho_CinCo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SDThunderBoltz
i do suck as an owner yeah...i aint very nice..but i do have a winning record and they arent my tactics their ones from good gm's so...


winning record - nothing to do with you so stop taking credit. you also tried taking my tactics and say I suck as a GM. Lol
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.