Warrior General Games

Originally posted by OSshane
Originally posted by Shefpan

Originally posted by TrevJo


What is quality of play?

I don't get it either. We played a #4, 12 and 31 and our # is one of the lowest if not lowest for quality of play.

Its your Avatar holing your teams power ranking back

Nothing can be held back by the power of Billy Mayes and his fine collection of TV merchandise!

Well Like I said... Rome is a slow build team now that I've taken over and we expect to be this leagues Detroit Lions this season anyway. It's okay... all I care about is building the teams stadium this season anyway.

Originally posted by oakland360
Well Like I said... Rome is a slow build team now that I've taken over and we expect to be this leagues Detroit Lions this season anyway. It's okay... all I care about is building the teams stadium this season anyway.

As you should

But next season... I'm going to try to kick all your butts...

Originally posted by oakland360
But next season... I'm going to try to kick all your butts...

Not if my team is still here.

I'm sure my team will still be here. I don't expect to win the championship game if we even make it. Next season will be 35+ ? God I hate recruiting..

Originally posted by willinsky
I'm sure my team will still be here. I don't expect to win the championship game if we even make it. Next season will be 35+ ? God I hate recruiting..

Then this isn't the game for you! lol

You may want to just write down each teams record next to their name...SoS means nothing if the team is 0-3, and it'd help to see how the teams rank in accordance to record, i.e. Wardogs being 10th at 3-0 (I know our SoS hasn't been strong, I'm not complaining I'm just giving an example.

Actually, strength of schedule means everything.

An 0-3 team that has lost to the three best teams in the league could possibly be better than a 3-0 team that has beaten up on the slowbuilders.

By the end of the season, we all will have 15 games in common (the one difference being the week one interconference matchup), so that 0-3 team will get it's turn against the slowbuilders, and the 3-0 team will get wracked up against the best in the league.

So it's important to know "How good have the teams they've played thusfar been?" since that will largely even out by the end of the year.

Isnt this already taken into account?

Recruiting was easier this time than last. I got the team late, after chemistry grace and had to recruit all the players. It's tough being the OC/DC/GM/Recruiter/Scout/Accountant...

Originally posted by willinsky
Recruiting was easier this time than last. I got the team late, after chemistry grace and had to recruit all the players. It's tough being the OC/DC/GM/Recruiter/Scout/Accountant...

Welcome to my world! lol

Originally posted by Gorm
Actually, strength of schedule means everything.

An 0-3 team that has lost to the three best teams in the league could possibly be better than a 3-0 team that has beaten up on the slowbuilders.

By the end of the season, we all will have 15 games in common (the one difference being the week one interconference matchup), so that 0-3 team will get it's turn against the slowbuilders, and the 3-0 team will get wracked up against the best in the league.

So it's important to know "How good have the teams they've played thusfar been?" since that will largely even out by the end of the year.

Well, quality of play should mean something as well, but if everything is as you say, shouldn't you put the team record on exactly like I said? , you pretty much argued for what I wanted.