Warrior General Games

Originally posted by kevbk6222
can't we just say good game and be done with it?

If both sides thought it was a good game..then yes that would be said. But Sahoj doesn't think that way so he is voicing his opinion, which is cool. He doesn't like when people voice their's though.

Oh man, I'm going to put my face into a brick wall.

Did all I have to do is switch out a couple CB's?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=274175&pbp_id=11117463
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=274175&pbp_id=11117550

Wow. I can't believe we actually wasted time arguing about this. Yes Sahoj, we used the WR screen. Obviously our gameplanner scouted your team and found something in your defense he felt we could expose with that play. Are you going to try to say that if you found something to exploit in an opponents defense, but only by using a play some people complained about, that you wouldn't use that play to help you win?

I am not trying to argue with you or call you any names. I am simply saying that our gameplan put us in the best position to win. That is what a game plan is supposed to do, right?

I advise you stop dwelling on this loss and give the Bucs your full attention. If you don't focus on the Bucs, don't expect to make it out of the first round. Congratulations on a good season and good luck in the playoffs.

In all and complete honesty, and I've posted it before in this thread
after being alerted: Anchorage played great defense in that game. It's
not a small feat to hold my team to 9 points for three quarters of play.

I've no beef with the Davao Dogs or the Northern Lights. I don't hold
internet grudges. Really, one of the greatest downfalls to large scale
webpage games are that the forums just dissolve into pits of shit,
insulting and forum trolls.

The WR Screen is my problem, especially that I will have to use some
particularly retarded defensive calls to stay alive in the playoffs
against it despite having a talented team who trucked pretty solidly
into 4th place.

No one has stopped the Warrior's WR Screen either and I still only run
it a small number of times a game. I'm the type of player who will
handicap myself until I find the level of challenge I'm looking for.
If all the Warriors did on offense is run a couple different high yield
runs, a pass or two and the WR Screen I think the game would bore me
to death.

To reiterate: My problem is the WR Screen and lack of balancing involved
with the play, not the teams who use it. Any posts perceived as an attempt
to discredit a win were likely poor communication on my part or in some
cases, a useless flame response versus another useless flame.

Grats to the Lights and Dogs.

Cheers,
Sahoj

Can you all STFU?

Originally posted by moepoker
Can you all STFU?

Hey! HEY YOU!! GTFO!!

We are going to run the WR screen every play. Hope you learn how to stop it.

Originally posted by smeberen
We are going to run the WR screen every play. Hope you learn how to stop it.

Now we know the secret to the Bucs success.....sarcasm!

Arrrr

Dang for all the hate on the WR screen you guys ran it a ton. I thought you didn't play that way? It's all good, it is a great play and I thought the FS would double one of the WR's not the TE.

Good game and good luck.

Smeberen

you are letting them off the hook. I think it's absolutely laughable, that someone who was so whiny about the WR screen and someone who has spent hours upon hours trying to stop it all the sudden says "Fuck It" I am just going to try to use it. Well Sahoj, you did it!! Congrats on joining the fun. Now i dont ever want to hear you bitch about the play again.

Good Luck vs the Dogs.... and I dare you to try to run that screen against us

We've run the play all season to some amount. I did turn it up for the playoffs
because I figured you would do the same and wanted to give my team's agents
atleast a chance at 1 playoff win.

GG Buccaneers.

that is pretty hypocritical

Bort's finally responded to the hundreds upon hundreds of posts complaining
about the WR Screen.

Originally posted by Bort
I've been working on some updates for tackler pathing recently (and some changes to reverse-pancaking of weak blockers) so I don't think this will be nearly as effective next season.

I'm basically adding two types of pathfinding logic for tacklers, depending on if there are blockers nearby (take sharper angles to get around them) or if they're open field (take a general "avoid players" vector).