Warrior General Games

Week 9 in Zeta Con

1 Hill Valley Deloreans 8-0-0 VS 2 Cosa Nostra Hitmen 8-0-0
CNH will dominate this one…not even close……

3 Kazakhstan Dragons 6-2 VS 8 Dresden Doomsday 4-4-0
Dragons win number 7

4 Italy Guardians 7-1-0 VS 5 Secretville Offtopics 7-1-0
Italy ……..by 21

6 South City Chiefs 6-2-0 VS 15 Southeast Silverbacks 1-7-0
SSC win an easy one over the Silverbacks

7 Bratislava Butchers 4-4-0 VS 16 Chernobyl Mariners 0-8-0
Butchers win but by how much…..so far the Mariners D has given up……..and the O is nowhere to be found…Beat 217

9 Mississippi Marsupials 4-4-0 VS 14 Flint Tropics 1-7-0
MM bask in the sun with a win over the Tropics

10 Grodno Demons 4-4-0 VS 12 Mad Dogs 1-7-0
Demons over the Dogs

11 Berlin Crusaders 2-6-0 VS 13 Sooner Syndicate 1-7-0
Hmmmmm………….Sooners win # 2



This is how it should look after week 9

Top 8
1 Cosa Nostra Hitmen 9-0-0
2 Italy Guardians 8-1-0
3 Hill Valley Deloreans 8-1-0
4 Secretville Offtopics 7-2-0
5 Kazakhstan Dragons 7-2-0
6 South City Chiefs 7-2-0
7 Grodno Demons 5-4-0
8 Mississippi Marsupials 5-4-0


Bottom 8
09 Bratislava Butchers 5-4-0
10 Dresden Doomsday 4-5-0
11 Sooner Syndicate 2-7-0
12 Berlin Crusaders 2-7-0
13 Mad Dogs 1-8-0
14 Flint Tropics 1-8-0
15 Southeast Silverbacks 1-8-0
16 Chernobyl Mariners 0-9-0

Nice write up ragu we will try to keep strong in our push for a rematch come playoffs.

Any analysis as to why certain teams will win ? Or score predictions ?

Originally posted by jedaviso
Any analysis as to why certain teams will win ? Or score predictions ?

1) Ok HVD sucks 85-10
2) Dragons are just a better team 35-34
3) Italy is the 2nd bset team in Zeta 75-20
4) The SCC are 6-2 and the Backs have one win ...what do you think...50-10
5) Ahhh the Butchers...there playing a team without a O & D again no brain..er 199-0
6) MM playing Flint...Flint has one win .....again no brain..er 89-0
7) Grodno ...playing against a 1 win team 59-3
8) Sooners have better team by a hair 2-0


happy..... I am...that was fun

I don't want to here crap about how many players I have ....you can do the same if you want. I hate recruiting so this is the way I choose to play the game.....

Originally posted by BigRagu

I don't want to here crap about how many players I have ....you can do the same if you want. I hate recruiting so this is the way I choose to play the game.....

So basically you're anti-social with no friends and totally lazy. That's why you created the players rather than recruit.

Gotcha. Thanks for clearing that up.

He is not antisocial. It makes sense because you can control most aspects of the game. Between my GM's and myself most of my team is owned by a very few agents. Several have more than two players on the team. I don't think being lazy applies, he has to work the same as you to pay for his FP. I salute anyone who us willing to devote that much effort.

ashame bort doesn't give any restrictions to people with that many players on a team.

Originally posted by domesticated_primate
He is not antisocial. It makes sense because you can control most aspects of the game. Between my GM's and myself most of my team is owned by a very few agents. Several have more than two players on the team. I don't think being lazy applies, he has to work the same as you to pay for his FP. I salute anyone who us willing to devote that much effort.

Thank You........

Originally posted by NeoProtege
ashame bort doesn't give any restrictions to people with that many players on a team.

Why .....Players like my self spend more ca$h for him to run this game......

Yeah, bort's not going to stop it, obviously for reasons why BigRagu just pointed out. It's all about the benjamins. I think it's just odd to play an mmorpg and not actually have teamwork involved.

Communication with teammmates, having players to set individual tactics to align with team gameplans, recruiting, networking, and things of that nature is a big part of what I consider this game to be about. That's why I'm saying he has less work to do than other teams do. It's obviously anyone's choice to not do all those things, so I'm definetly not saying it's unfair. It's just less work. I've seen some teams where one guy owned *ALL* the players on the team. I'm sure most of us have the cash for that, but personally I have better places to spend excess cash (Vegas, baby, vegas).

Anyway, Happy thanksgiving to the EA #4 league. Or to those who don't celebrate it, happy thursday.

Originally posted by jedaviso
I think it's just odd to play an mmorpg and not actually have teamwork involved.


I don't know, Guild Wars has heroes and henchman so you can play by yourself and not get slaughtered. I personally always liked solo play in Star Wars Galaxies as much as I enjoyed teaming up with other players. It's just different strokes for different folks. Part of what makes this game cool is that you can play it either way, if you have the scratch to do so. Happy Thanksgiving, and Go Butchers!