UPDATED 12/7
zgcreech
offline
offline
ok so because we played the second half of our game with our hb at qb against the NSDK we moved down in the rankings cause we only won by 85 instead of the 170 we should have won by. I am starting to get it I think. For anyone wondering Brick Powerage went 4-12 for like 70 yards or so and threw an int. So basically no QB controversy in Carolina.
Last edited Dec 8, 2008 00:07:56
Warlock
offline
offline
Originally posted by zgcreech
ok so because we played the second half of our game with our hb at qb against the NSDK we moved down in the rankings cause we only won by 85 instead of the 170 we should have won by. I am starting to get it I think. For anyone wondering Brick Powerage went 4-12 for like 70 yards or so and threw an int. So basically no QB controversy in Carolina.
Pretty much.
ok so because we played the second half of our game with our hb at qb against the NSDK we moved down in the rankings cause we only won by 85 instead of the 170 we should have won by. I am starting to get it I think. For anyone wondering Brick Powerage went 4-12 for like 70 yards or so and threw an int. So basically no QB controversy in Carolina.
Pretty much.
Victory Jones
offline
offline
oh snap...
now thats an impressive win right there.
gg Marauders...
'stay classy San Diego'
~ Ron Burgundy
now thats an impressive win right there.
gg Marauders...
'stay classy San Diego'
~ Ron Burgundy
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
