Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Wrian Bestbrook
The Siena Saints have dropped out officially. We are making moves again, building for next season, because a team vote decided that with are 45 overall rating, w are top of the league, just need better chemistry so we are hoping on raising that ratings to 48 by next season and have chemistry in the 60s by day 1. So ya...

??IM confused, please clarify!!

Originally posted by OUTLAW77
Originally posted by Wrian Bestbrook

The Siena Saints have dropped out officially. We are making moves again, building for next season, because a team vote decided that with are 45 overall rating, w are top of the league, just need better chemistry so we are hoping on raising that ratings to 48 by next season and have chemistry in the 60s by day 1. So ya...

??IM confused, please clarify!!

Ditto

yea...most teams in the league are around the 45 overall...so you should be competing...but i couldnt understand what you said either...

Did he just say that they should be the best in the league?

Cocaine's a hell of a drug

a team vote said they're 45 overall and should be on top of league if not for shit chem so they're going to ruin chem by making moves to improve team and come in as a 60 next season.

*sigh*

If I'm on that team and have to deal with a guy who writes like that, I'd be asking to be part of that "making moves" plan.

Originally posted by wsdp
a team vote said they're 45 overall and should be on top of league if not for shit chem so they're going to ruin chem by making moves to improve team and come in as a 60 next season.

*sigh*

If I'm on that team and have to deal with a guy who writes like that, I'd be asking to be part of that "making moves" plan.

LMAO.......

I just find it ... interesting that someone would base their team strategy on something as worthless as matchup ratings.

Originally posted by Sarg01
I just find it ... interesting that someone would base their team strategy on something as worthless as matchup ratings.

lol, I base it a little of individual player ratings, but not on the actual overall ratings...but they still do tell how good a team is usually...

I see Sienna's point in the ratings tho...they are about average with the rest of the league, but are still getting beaten by worse teams...

bad builds/bad tactics

they must be doing something wrong

Originally posted by K Rod
Originally posted by Sarg01

I just find it ... interesting that someone would base their team strategy on something as worthless as matchup ratings.

lol, I base it a little of individual player ratings, but not on the actual overall ratings...but they still do tell how good a team is usually...

I see Sienna's point in the ratings tho...they are about average with the rest of the league, but are still getting beaten by worse teams...

The answer to that isn't get better players - it's figure out why you're not playing up to your potential. At least, in my book that's the answer.

Even levels are a better indicator than matchup ratings. Which of these two starting RDEs for title contenders in the same conference is a better pass rusher? Pass Rush bar of 42 or Pass Rush bar of 33?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=755975 - Pass Rush 42
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=755264 - Pass Rush 33