Warrior General Games

Originally posted by F8n4tune
But how is that any different than dropping someones funds , it's pretty much the same issue ? I must be missing something here.

raising someones funds who just foolishly spent it?

Originally posted by F8n4tune
But how is that any different than dropping someones funds , it's pretty much the same issue ? I must be missing something here.

ib4communistGLB

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers

that would be one of the issues we'd face if we did "reset" team funds.

it would probably be fair with the equipment change. altho the exploit would be right now everyone would spend all of their remaining cash on their players.

TBH I already thought about that. But since i'm only keeping 4 and they're set no need to. But if I was keeping them all I sure would.

Originally posted by F8n4tune
TBH I already thought about that. But since i'm only keeping 4 and they're set no need to. But if I was keeping them all I sure would.

not everyone is only keeping 4.

Originally posted by 5STAR
ARE YOU BORT? NO SO STOP ACTING YOU HAVE THE SLIGHTEST CLUE ON WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN
I don't need to be Bort, nor do I need to know the future. This is simple logic, which is why some people get it and you clearly don't. Typing it in bolded caps just highlights that fact, and trust me when I tell you that we're already aware of your struggles to grasp these issues.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by F8n4tune

But how is that any different than dropping someones funds , it's pretty much the same issue ? I must be missing something here.

raising someones funds who just foolishly spent it?

Who's to judge that though ? The OBJECT is to get the game right , if everyone starts off even that's a good start. Of course there will be many a clownshoe who will repeat the mistake of mishandling funds again but that's a role in the game.

DD, can you at least answer this:
Originally posted by jdbolick
If we accept the premise that piles of cash are an advantage in this game, then it's inescapable that teams who dropped down prior to S14 will possess such an advantage over teams that dropped down prior to S15. And those teams will end up competing against one another over the long-haul.

Won't teams who dropped down prior to this season have a significant advantage over teams who drop down at the end of this season?

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by F8n4tune

TBH I already thought about that. But since i'm only keeping 4 and they're set no need to. But if I was keeping them all I sure would.

not everyone is only keeping 4.

Of course , but hell I went the SSB route when the game tailed off for me and they were going to die anyway because that's boring too.

But the Elite league has got me flowing again because we were lucky enough to get in one that's REALLY Elite.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by F8n4tune

But how is that any different than dropping someones funds , it's pretty much the same issue ? I must be missing something here.

ib4communistGLB

In Communist GLB, Stadium resets You!

Originally posted by F8n4tune
Who's to judge that though ? The OBJECT is to get the game right , if everyone starts off even that's a good start. Of course there will be many a clownshoe who will repeat the mistake of mishandling funds again but that's a role in the game.

if they could wipe out all equip and player cash along with moving team funds based on league...that would be fair...no?

not sure if they could do that tho? DD?

it would make all current teams looking to exploit by spending all cash now obsolete.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Won't teams who dropped down prior to this season have a significant advantage over teams who drop down at the end of this season?

significant? not if that money has less of an effect on equipment, etc. thus the other changes are need as well.

Originally posted by bhall43
if they could wipe out all equip and player cash along with moving team funds based on league...that would be fair...no?

not sure if they could do that tho? DD?

it would make all current teams looking to exploit by spending all cash now obsolete.

however enough cash could be left for them to re-equip what they currently had?

granted that probably goes against Borts "the game was never meant for all players to have full equip" statement.

Originally posted by bhall43
however enough cash could be left for them to re-equip what they currently had?

granted that probably goes against Borts "the game was never meant for all players to have full equip" statement.

well...then again if equip was team owned...it wouldnt matter i guess.

I'm curious... I read somewhere in this 90 pages of this thread that there's some change with regards on how equipment is purchase or used or something like that.... What changes would they be? Cheaper cost of EQ?