Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Galactic Empire


Turnover Differntial
1. Korriban Sith Academy (Rookie : Franklin) : 24
2. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 24
3. Hartford Spartans (Rookie : Jefferson) : 20
4. Louisville Pumas (Rookie : Jefferson) : 18
5. Old Orleans Razorfish (Rookie : Hamilton) : 14


all cpu right? cpu is too overpowered

Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
I think we would be way way way stronger with human players.

Some of these all whatever teams put all their eggs in one basket and when things go bad they go bad. I mean it's not like you don't know what's coming. With no run threat you just have to defend 2-4 passes.

Plenty of balanced human teams in rookie also struggle vs CPU players with good gameplans. It shouldn't happen

Sup Titty, Titty, Bang, Bang

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/compare_teams/2644/2484

Originally posted by HayRow
all cpu right? cpu is too overpowered

Or my defensive scheme is so awesome that even a CPU can do it.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Sup Titty, Titty, Bang, Bang

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/compare_teams/2644/2484

over under on INT is set at 3.5

Originally posted by HayRow
over under on INT is set at 3.5

Can i say under and switch your tactics to pure run? what do i get?

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Or my defensive scheme is so awesome that even a CPU can do it.

its basically the zone buff you've always dreamed of.

Originally posted by HayRow
Plenty of balanced human teams in rookie also struggle vs CPU players with good gameplans. It shouldn't happen

Bad or non existent game plans shouldn't beat good game plans. CPUs are the reason we are not blowing people out and struggling in every game.

Originally posted by HayRow
Plenty of balanced human teams in rookie also struggle vs CPU players with good gameplans. It shouldn't happen

Actually it should happen and doesn't happen enough. I think they should even add S* CPU players. The CPU should be a challenge.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Actually it should happen and doesn't happen enough. I think they should even add S* CPU players. The CPU should be a challenge.

At this point in the dwindling userbase I agree for soph+. It sucks when more than half of your games are non competitive but in rookie that isn't a problem.

Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
Bad or non existent game plans shouldn't beat good game plans. CPUs are the reason we are not blowing people out and struggling in every game.

I agree, but cpu with gameplan should not beat human with gameplan

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Actually it should happen and doesn't happen enough. I think they should even add S* CPU players. The CPU should be a challenge.

terrible business model haha...i mean, just IDIOTIC

Originally posted by HayRow
I agree, but cpu with gameplan should not beat human with gameplan

Why not??? Maybe the cpu had a better game plan?

Originally posted by HayRow
terrible business model haha...i mean, just IDIOTIC

So making a competitive game is idiotic? I bet you play rookie level on Madden and win 100-0.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Why not??? Maybe the cpu had a better game plan?

They left my TE uncovered out of the 2TE set, and I had crosses dialed up pretty high with my TE targeted. That kept the chains moving. When you are outmatched you want to control the clock and limit possessions then you have a better chance to be in it at the end.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/470936/1565105
Kind of a gift.

Combine that with knowing exactly what they were going to do on offense then they have a problem. All pass defenses were available due to zero run threat to account for.