Warrior General Games

Yeah the last ratings were lolratings IMO. This one looks a lot closer. It's obvious not everyone put much time into their votes the first time. And even those that did might not have had enough information to even give teams the proper credit (or lack thereof).

Wish we had a new thread each week to find it easier along with +/- from the poll before.

I'll get one up today both here and in the owners forum.
The one there will be easier to track because I can lock it to prevent getting sidetracked.

Originally posted by MC_Hammer

Edit: If we had waited just 2 more "weeks" before starting the Magellan Cup matchups, both of the teams that got bumped would have been in it.

My sincerest apologies to Band of Brothers and Telstar Rebels.

No worries, it was just bad timing with the back to back losses to Indy and GCMM.... just GL to the squads in the Magellan Cup.

thanks again for doing these!!

I predict change.

Originally posted by josh85_1983
No worries, it was just bad timing with the back to back losses to Indy and GCMM.... just GL to the squads in the Magellan Cup.

Yeah, I tried to tell people that the rankings were screwed. I didn't think Indy was good enough either based on what some of the rankings showed.

Originally posted by pottsman
I predict change.

Blasphemy! The world is flat I tell you!

Originally posted by refguru
Originally posted by josh85_1983

No worries, it was just bad timing with the back to back losses to Indy and GCMM.... just GL to the squads in the Magellan Cup.

Yeah, I tried to tell people that the rankings were screwed. I didn't think Indy was good enough either based on what some of the rankings showed.

wait, raising my BS flag... ha, I have faced your squad before and knew they were good bro, matter of fact I know i had you place at least third!

Originally posted by josh85_1983
wait, raising my BS flag... ha, I have faced your squad before and knew they were good bro, matter of fact I know i had you place at least third!

Yeah, Josh I agree. I knew we were better than that--but it doesn't matter what I think--it's based on the rankings. For instance, Melbourne is MUCH better than people give them credit for--but they base it on their standings and don't even look at the teams who they lost to right off the bat.

Originally posted by refguru
Yeah, Josh I agree. I knew we were better than that--but it doesn't matter what I think--it's based on the rankings. For instance, Melbourne is MUCH better than people give them credit for--but they base it on their standings and don't even look at the teams who they lost to right off the bat.


I know, that is why I was not thrilled about missing out on the Magellan Cup because of my losses to you and GCMM two teams that are straight sick an are battling for the number one spot with EEA...

They saw a 2-2 team... same for Melbourne... which are sneaky good...

Originally posted by josh85_1983
They saw a 2-2 team...
Meh, we dont game plan anyways

FWIW, I always take opponents into consideration when I send in votes..... but I know many coaches/GMs don't GLB-wide.
I can't speak for those in OPL personally, but going over the votes when putting them together it was pretty obvious that some just did the top 2-3 then took the rest from the league page rankings.

That said, I didn't send in the vote for NMI.

Originally posted by bug03
Originally posted by MC_Hammer



That said, I didn't send in the vote for EEA.



yeah, I didn't send in a vote for EEA either, lol.

Originally posted by MC_Hammer

Zeta

1) Berlin
2) ALS*
2) Feebs*
4) Moscow
5) Razorback
6) Rekohu
7) SFF
8) PM Scallywags
9) Gorillas
10) Booty Island
11) Savages
12) Tuvalu
13) Vanuatu
14) Gunners
15) Mutiny
16) Sea Dragons


I honestly think there is very little difference in the top 4 of Zeta. Any given Sunday for those head to head games.