WOOOOOOOOO ALCOHOL!!! GET FUCKED UP!
dawgs1235
offline
offline
Updated 1/6- Week 3
This week was pretty tough, i tried not to penalize south beach too much for the OT loss, but inevitably, some teams that beat other teams are going to get ranked higher.
with the parity we've got, esp in the eastern conference, this is going to be tougher and tougher. haha
This week was pretty tough, i tried not to penalize south beach too much for the OT loss, but inevitably, some teams that beat other teams are going to get ranked higher.
with the parity we've got, esp in the eastern conference, this is going to be tougher and tougher. haha
Last edited Jan 6, 2009 14:15:41
bfriended
offline
offline
I like looking at this thread, just to see Holly sitting at the top... If we ever lose, god forbid. I am not checking this thread again! lol
dawgs1235
offline
offline
gg philly.
i think we've finally got our settings in check.
2nd half: 41-6.
ouch. there's that depth.
i think we've finally got our settings in check.
2nd half: 41-6.
ouch. there's that depth.
Last edited Jan 6, 2009 14:33:47
TtD
offline
offline
Gotta give it to ORLY this week, their Eagles style blitz run D gave us no end of trouble for a good half of football there.
josh2otter
offline
offline
Originally posted by dawgs1235
gg philly.
i think we've finally got our settings in check.
2nd half: 41-6.
ouch. there's that depth.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=298066&pbp_id=2979619
What dumb little sim dot shiney object programmer can't understand cover 2 and double man coverage... I have to take my frustrations out on ORLY in 2 days... 3rd and 10.5... #$!#$~#$#@#$~@#$~@!#$$@#$!@~!#$@$#%#$%@$%@$#!$@
gg philly.
i think we've finally got our settings in check.
2nd half: 41-6.
ouch. there's that depth.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=298066&pbp_id=2979619
What dumb little sim dot shiney object programmer can't understand cover 2 and double man coverage... I have to take my frustrations out on ORLY in 2 days... 3rd and 10.5... #$!#$~#$#@#$~@#$~@!#$$@#$!@~!#$@$#%#$%@$%@$#!$@
dawgs1235
offline
offline
a 33, 31, and 35 CB vs a 42 WR and a 43 QB....
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
pksskulls
offline
offline
lol skulls move to 8th. hell stays at 2. all the kings men drop 1 to 12th? Its gonna be a roller coaster season
josh2otter
offline
offline
Originally posted by dawgs1235
a 33, 31, and 35 CB vs a 42 WR and a 43 QB....
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
I completely agree, just my competitive side
You guys have always had a great team and now the merger should help you out but we were hoping to squeak one by on the chemistry that is rising more and more each day... not to mention our scouting didn't hit the broad side of the barn. We'll most likely would have lost to you in your original state... as well as to the teabaggers but you went ahead and took care of the teabaggers for us, thank you
1 loss for 1 win = .500 which is fine by me
a 33, 31, and 35 CB vs a 42 WR and a 43 QB....
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
I completely agree, just my competitive side
You guys have always had a great team and now the merger should help you out but we were hoping to squeak one by on the chemistry that is rising more and more each day... not to mention our scouting didn't hit the broad side of the barn. We'll most likely would have lost to you in your original state... as well as to the teabaggers but you went ahead and took care of the teabaggers for us, thank you
1 loss for 1 win = .500 which is fine by meAnebriated
offline
offline
Originally posted by josh2otter
Originally posted by dawgs1235
a 33, 31, and 35 CB vs a 42 WR and a 43 QB....
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
I completely agree, just my competitive side
You guys have always had a great team and now the merger should help you out but we were hoping to squeak one by on the chemistry that is rising more and more each day... not to mention our scouting didn't hit the broad side of the barn. We'll most likely would have lost to you in your original state... as well as to the teabaggers but you went ahead and took care of the teabaggers for us, thank you 1 loss for 1 win = .500 which is fine by me
Yeah it probably didnt help that when I scouted it was after 2 losses that they werent happy about and making furious changes to the AIs... noted and I wont make that mistake again...
Originally posted by dawgs1235
a 33, 31, and 35 CB vs a 42 WR and a 43 QB....
i was a tough play for y'all, but not THAT omfg unbelievably surprising.
our depth caught up with y'all in the 2nd half. your 5 CBs averaged 44.4 plays vs. our 5 WRs 35.2 plays. King only had 32 plays.
makes a big difference.
I completely agree, just my competitive side
You guys have always had a great team and now the merger should help you out but we were hoping to squeak one by on the chemistry that is rising more and more each day... not to mention our scouting didn't hit the broad side of the barn. We'll most likely would have lost to you in your original state... as well as to the teabaggers but you went ahead and took care of the teabaggers for us, thank you
1 loss for 1 win = .500 which is fine by meYeah it probably didnt help that when I scouted it was after 2 losses that they werent happy about and making furious changes to the AIs... noted and I wont make that mistake again...
dawgs1235
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greenday4537
Wow, bumped up to #7. No respect.
whats the problem you moved up a spot, is there anyone above you that you put below you?
Wow, bumped up to #7. No respect.
whats the problem you moved up a spot, is there anyone above you that you put below you?
Greenday4537
offline
offline
Originally posted by dawgs1235
Originally posted by Greenday4537
Wow, bumped up to #7. No respect.
whats the problem you moved up a spot, is there anyone above you that you put below you?
Uh, Chicago. 1-2 team over a 3-0 team?
Originally posted by Greenday4537
Wow, bumped up to #7. No respect.
whats the problem you moved up a spot, is there anyone above you that you put below you?
Uh, Chicago. 1-2 team over a 3-0 team?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
