Warrior General Games

Originally posted by headsigh
It'll be locked way before then.

Hope not!

Originally posted by jdbolick

If you do what you claim you're going to do, then this change is completely irrelevant and unnecessary. If you don't follow through on what you claim, which is the way GLB generally fails to live up to its promises, then some people get screwed over while others benefit. That's the concern.

Either way, this rule is a bad idea. If you actually do revamp the financial system, then there was no point to making this change in the first place. If you don't revamp it, then you're punishing one group of people for bad timing while allowing people who did the same thing a season earlier come out ahead.


I agree with you on this.

Originally posted by jdbolick

If you do what you claim you're going to do, then this change is completely irrelevant and unnecessary. If you don't follow through on what you claim, which is the way GLB generally fails to live up to its promises, then some people get screwed over while others benefit. That's the concern.

Either way, this rule is a bad idea. If you actually do revamp the financial system, then there was no point to making this change in the first place. If you don't revamp it, then you're punishing one group of people for bad timing while allowing people who did the same thing a season earlier come out ahead.


this change is meant to help all teams. long-term

i like picard too

Originally posted by jdbolick

If you do what you claim you're going to do, then this change is completely irrelevant and unnecessary. If you don't follow through on what you claim, which is the way GLB generally fails to live up to its promises, then some people get screwed over while others benefit. That's the concern.

Either way, this rule is a bad idea. If you actually do revamp the financial system, then there was no point to making this change in the first place. If you don't revamp it, then you're punishing one group of people for bad timing while allowing people who did the same thing a season earlier come out ahead.


without knowing their ideas in full details...you are just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks...tbh.

Originally posted by mikeandbrooke07
Originally posted by headsigh



Put teams into league by some sort of record (or Effective Level/player age for people mad about SSB).



new changes plus full reset = complete destruction of SSB


+1

nm

Originally posted by bhall43
without knowing their ideas in full details...you are just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks...tbh.

he knows he doesn't like this change, and he wants everyone to know it. his opinion has been heard and we do appreciate it.

Originally posted by F8n4tune
This is the problem with this game........................taken from this summery http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3800625&page=last#33663643

Originally posted by Bort



I understand, and it's sucky, but I feel like I can't in good conscience start resetting everyone's teams based on a brand new rule. We debated on adding the rule, hemmed and hawed, and that's our fault, not the owners'.
Some people are already annoyed by the new rule, even with warning. Retroactively enforcing it is not something they're going to stand for IMO.
Over time, those teams will weed out as they demote again or promote back to the higher ranks where it doesn't matter as much.

Bort/Peter you are one decent dude but if you want this game to live you have to understand that it's all inclusive. Stop catering to a few and make all rules apply to EVERYONE , or the cows will move over the hill to graze man.

I have to agree DD , if it's all going to change anyway than just make ALL teams go through the same thing now. Not just some teams. This has the feeling of "we're just not sure so we'll do this for now" and leads to my other post an hour or so ago about just more problems to be fixed 3-4 seasons from now no ?


Again I love the idea but it's pretty lame if not everyone has to follow it.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
this change is meant to help all teams. long-term
If you actually believe that, then there's no reason not to apply it to all teams.


Originally posted by bhall43
without knowing their ideas in full details...you are just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks...tbh.
It's simple logic. Say, for instance, that the U.S. government promised to ban ownership of Toyota automobiles by the end of 2010. If so, then what would be the purpose behind forcing a recall now? The coming measure would obviously make the current one irrelevant. Similarly, if the "new cash system" is actually going to make big piles of cash irrelevant, then trying to get rid of some piles of cash while letting other teams keep other piles of cash is nonsensical.

Originally posted by F8n4tune
I have to agree DD , if it's all going to change anyway than just make ALL teams go through the same thing now. Not just some teams. This has the feeling of "we're just not sure so we'll do this for now" and leads to my other post an hour or so ago about just more problems to be fixed 3-4 seasons from now no ?


Again I love the idea but it's pretty lame if not everyone has to follow it.

just to clarify:

you think that all teams should get their funds reset to some set number based on the league that they are in?

Does this mean team chemistry will be reset as well?

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
he knows he doesn't like this change, and he wants everyone to know it. his opinion has been heard and we do appreciate it.
More like, I understand things immediately while it takes you weeks if not months to eventually come around and realize that I was correct all along. This has happened more times than I can count, so I foolishly hope that things will change while past experience tells me I'm wasting the effort.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers

this change is meant to help all teams. long-term
If you actually believe that, then there's no reason not to apply it to all teams.


Originally posted by bhall43

without knowing their ideas in full details...you are just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks...tbh.
It's simple logic. Say, for instance, that the U.S. government promised to ban ownership of Toyota automobiles by the end of 2010. If so, then what would be the purpose behind forcing a recall now? The coming measure would obviously make the current one irrelevant. Similarly, if the "new cash system" is actually going to make big piles of cash irrelevant, then trying to get rid of some piles of cash while letting other teams keep other piles of cash is nonsensical.


if you force a recall now you can prevent over 9 months of death to the general population

YOU = FAIL

Originally posted by jdbolick

It's simple logic. Say, for instance, that the U.S. government promised to ban ownership of Toyota automobiles by the end of 2010. If so, then what would be the purpose behind forcing a recall now? The coming measure would obviously make the current one irrelevant. Similarly, if the "new cash system" is actually going to make big piles of cash irrelevant, then trying to get rid of some piles of cash while letting other teams keep other piles of cash is nonsensical.


its not logic...its unknown...