Warrior General Games

Originally posted by TxSteve
Is this by design...or a missed coverage read or something?

TE left open
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166599/3290196

By design looking at the playart. You only get m2m against the 3 WRs.

That play has "Fry for 400 yards" written all over it.

It'd be a better play if bacskide lb had a middle 5th zone, and strongside lb got strong mid 5th.

Originally posted by Galithor
By design looking at the playart. You only get m2m against the 3 WRs.

That play has "Fry for 400 yards" written all over it.

the cover 2 is suppose to have the ss in man coverage c1 is the one where the safety goes a deep zone

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
the cover 2 is suppose to have the ss in man coverage c1 is the one where the safety goes a deep zone

Shouldn't that be reverse?

Originally posted by Galithor
Shouldn't that be reverse?

yes it should be but i was going by play art

Originally posted by Corndog
That is Cover 3 Tiger.

Hey, would it be possible to move my name to the opposite side of the "Blitz" label? Currently its covered up.

nice changes. cool to see one of my plays made it as well

Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
Hey, would it be possible to move my name to the opposite side of the "Blitz" label? Currently its covered up.

Got sacked.

Originally posted by kaiijy
Got sacked.

LOL yeah

I'm going back to my original statement that the marketplace is dead, rookie players were either already claimed, signing with the owners own team, and not looking for teams..... I don't know about the rest of the levels but i'm sure it's the same, not many people creating players this season, unless they have been claimed already

Hey guys, just wanted to let you know that inside rushing is still working

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166661/3300455

On the lurks, there were these notes on my plays:
- Dime 3-2-6 C2 Double LB Lurk: http://i.imgur.com/SePpDzk.png
- Intended for 3 WR, CB man over TE.
- Dime 3-2-6 C1 Double LB Lurk: http://i.imgur.com/zyU3txx.png
- Strong safety into TE coverage, intended for 4 WR
- Nickel C2 Double LB Lurk: http://i.imgur.com/wU1BaXu.png
- intended for 2 WR, CB man over TE.
- Nickel C1 Double LB Lurk: http://i.imgur.com/CywnF2h.png
- intended for 2-3 WR

So the the TE should always be covered by either a TE or a CB. Definitely crazy to even list it for a WR above (for the C2's), unless you're one of those zone freaks lol.

C1 looking decent: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166661/3300475 - C1 Double Lurk working ok here vs 3WR
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166661/3300486 - C1 Double Lurk working ok here vs 4WR
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166661/3300504 - C1 Double Lurk working ok here vs 3WR Trips

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Hey guys, just wanted to let you know that inside rushing is still working

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/166661/3300455

only because DD can't tackle.

Originally posted by TxSteve
only because DD can't tackle.

It must be all that tackling I'm missing even though I have more on defense than the Stunners...

Anyone noticing decreased performance from o-line? Seems to be the same.