Regardless of whether he stays in on a pass or not nobody is going to give a te pass blocking skills. Lol
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Season 5 Changes!
Laggo
offline
offline
Originally posted by willcoll
To those complaining about holding a receiving TE (Peeti)
If you want to build a guy with pure pass catching abilities he should be a wide out not a TE. The position of TE requires a guy to block sometimes. And there is no way the game could differ a blocking TE from a receiving TE based on the builds, your asking to much if that is what you want. TEs block sometimes. Get that in your head and accommodate that in your build.
The first rule of GLB is to stop treating it like real football.
To those complaining about holding a receiving TE (Peeti)
If you want to build a guy with pure pass catching abilities he should be a wide out not a TE. The position of TE requires a guy to block sometimes. And there is no way the game could differ a blocking TE from a receiving TE based on the builds, your asking to much if that is what you want. TEs block sometimes. Get that in your head and accommodate that in your build.
The first rule of GLB is to stop treating it like real football.
bhall43
offline
offline
I started a HB with pass blocking skills and then I played like 5 games and thought wow this is really stupid.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by willcoll
To those complaining about holding a receiving TE (Peeti)
If you want to build a guy with pure pass catching abilities he should be a wide out not a TE. The position of TE requires a guy to block sometimes. And there is no way the game could differ a blocking TE from a receiving TE based on the builds, your asking to much if that is what you want. TEs block sometimes. Get that in your head and accommodate that in your build.
Lol...sure. But not PASS BLOCKING skills. They have some Run BLOCKING skills
To those complaining about holding a receiving TE (Peeti)
If you want to build a guy with pure pass catching abilities he should be a wide out not a TE. The position of TE requires a guy to block sometimes. And there is no way the game could differ a blocking TE from a receiving TE based on the builds, your asking to much if that is what you want. TEs block sometimes. Get that in your head and accommodate that in your build.
Lol...sure. But not PASS BLOCKING skills. They have some Run BLOCKING skills
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Regardless of whether he stays in on a pass or not nobody is going to give a te pass blocking skills. Lol
Next time I play Air Raid, I'm blitzing Cleveland into submission.
I know we can't cover Fry, so we'll just convince Cleveland that Fry has more important things to do, like getting reverse pancaked by a speedy, high intimidation LB
(seriously, this is like the only good thing defensively to come out of this new rattled mechanic...otherwise, it's just another way in which passing offenses seriously overpower any defenses)
Regardless of whether he stays in on a pass or not nobody is going to give a te pass blocking skills. Lol
Next time I play Air Raid, I'm blitzing Cleveland into submission.
I know we can't cover Fry, so we'll just convince Cleveland that Fry has more important things to do, like getting reverse pancaked by a speedy, high intimidation LB
(seriously, this is like the only good thing defensively to come out of this new rattled mechanic...otherwise, it's just another way in which passing offenses seriously overpower any defenses)
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
Next time I play Air Raid, I'm blitzing Cleveland into submission.
I know we can't cover Fry, so we'll just convince Cleveland that Fry has more important things to do, like getting reverse pancaked by a speedy, high intimidation LB
(seriously, this is like the only good thing defensively to come out of this new rattled mechanic...otherwise, it's just another way in which passing offenses seriously overpower any defenses)
we did get some coverage changes, so dont already blame everything in terms of OP passing
Next time I play Air Raid, I'm blitzing Cleveland into submission.
I know we can't cover Fry, so we'll just convince Cleveland that Fry has more important things to do, like getting reverse pancaked by a speedy, high intimidation LB
(seriously, this is like the only good thing defensively to come out of this new rattled mechanic...otherwise, it's just another way in which passing offenses seriously overpower any defenses)
we did get some coverage changes, so dont already blame everything in terms of OP passing
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
we did get some coverage changes, so dont already blame everything in terms of OP passing
Oh. I'm definitely in "Let's See How Power Requirements And Better DB Alignment Works" mode.
But, with bad receivers being held back more often, it's going to make those annoying catches between double coverage a lot more common. Just need to see if never having separation and forcing CiT rolls is enough to offset that.
we did get some coverage changes, so dont already blame everything in terms of OP passing
Oh. I'm definitely in "Let's See How Power Requirements And Better DB Alignment Works" mode.
But, with bad receivers being held back more often, it's going to make those annoying catches between double coverage a lot more common. Just need to see if never having separation and forcing CiT rolls is enough to offset that.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
So, I have some possible tweaks in mind with the rattled mechanic.
Anyone played with the new zone coverage at all? Dookie won 3 of the 4 quick scrims with my haphazardly thrown together zone playbook.
Look at the Games from Doge All Go, Sophemore. Think it still Looks terrible, especially the flat ones
So, I have some possible tweaks in mind with the rattled mechanic.
Anyone played with the new zone coverage at all? Dookie won 3 of the 4 quick scrims with my haphazardly thrown together zone playbook.
Look at the Games from Doge All Go, Sophemore. Think it still Looks terrible, especially the flat ones
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
So, I have some possible tweaks in mind with the rattled mechanic.
Anyone played with the new zone coverage at all? Dookie won 3 of the 4 quick scrims with my haphazardly thrown together zone playbook.
Zone defense team doge all go http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/808
So, I have some possible tweaks in mind with the rattled mechanic.
Anyone played with the new zone coverage at all? Dookie won 3 of the 4 quick scrims with my haphazardly thrown together zone playbook.
Zone defense team doge all go http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/808
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Look at the Games from Doge All Go, Sophemore. Think it still Looks terrible, especially the flat ones
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Zone defense team doge all go http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/808
Look at the Games from Doge All Go, Sophemore. Think it still Looks terrible, especially the flat ones
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Zone defense team doge all go http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/808
bhall43
offline
offline
Can't imagine that even if Zone was a reliable sort of defense against the pass that Sophmore level would be a very good indication. That is a lot to ask for coverage.
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Can't imagine that even if Zone was a reliable sort of defense against the pass that Sophmore level would be a very good indication. That is a lot to ask for coverage.
Yea, playing coverage in general just doesnt really work in rookie and early sophomore. Its much easier to stop the pass blitzing usually.
Can't imagine that even if Zone was a reliable sort of defense against the pass that Sophmore level would be a very good indication. That is a lot to ask for coverage.
Yea, playing coverage in general just doesnt really work in rookie and early sophomore. Its much easier to stop the pass blitzing usually.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
