Warrior General Games

Regardless, I don't think they intended us to be able to shove our HB in at QB for running purposes. Might as well give us the GLB1 AI/DC options if that's the case. I'm sure the HB @ QB thing gets fixed at a minimum...

Originally posted by peeti
Jupp, already pointed that out after Game 1 that this league is flooded with RQBs...Also the first 2 you listed are #1 and #2 in HOF. Both SSs as well. Jeesus, that league is cheesy...

And no, Lefty didnt give in too late. He is not a Rusher like the other 2, more a hybrid. I dant want to use the QB rollout too much. Just figured I will have to a bit, to be a threat to the rest. We have 2 great HBs and 5 posession WRs who will bring most of the pain I think.

EDIT: Or I might understood you wrong again^^

this is what i did in rookie season with neb. and lincoln had to get my wins why i built my real plan basing off my game with yorick today they shouldnt have too much longer on the toss and qb sweeps unfortunately i screwed up on defensive tactics that game

I took my qb off the DC and no HB runs

Originally posted by Parab00n
leave it blank.

didnt work for me^^ http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/64894

What else did u do Para?

have to take them off the main DC too, looking at his starters page.

Originally posted by mutleyddmc DTD
have to take them off the main DC too, looking at his starters page.

I did as well...still WRs in

Originally posted by peeti
I did as well...still WRs in

Are you sure? On your starters page there is still a qb showing

because of my Default DC man...I made a new one for that scrim

Originally posted by mutleyddmc DTD
Are you sure? On your starters page there is still a qb showing

besides...it didnt lut in tge QB man...just WR'S

Originally posted by peeti
I did as well...still WRs in

Yeah I ran a few scrimmages yesterday spamming QB rollout and I took my QB off the depth chart. It ended up putting my WR's and even my SS at QB. It will still mostly effective though. Not sure how to get the HB's in there.

Originally posted by Homage
Regardless, I don't think they intended us to be able to shove our HB in at QB for running purposes. Might as well give us the GLB1 AI/DC options if that's the case. I'm sure the HB @ QB thing gets fixed at a minimum...
I think that even the most virulent rollout defenders will agree with that.

Originally posted by Parab00n
Gonna abuse this as much as possible in hoping we get a fix, take your QB out of the Goalline DC and have your HBs run instead.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/64867/792134
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/64867/792327
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/64867/792669
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/64867/793010

Para - do you feel like a chump for all those hours spent game planning...when you could have just plugged this offense in and watched the wins roll?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/64910 - 62 pts and 742 yards on Queen City

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/64911 - 28 and 286 on TT's

tbf it looks like TT was just using 5-2 Man Defense. Might have been a little better using some of the zones.

Originally posted by bhall43
tbf it looks like TT was just using 5-2 Man Defense. Might have been a little better using some of the zones.

That 5-2 actually worked very well. It pushed blockers into the QBs path and my Powerback runs only in right angles in the backfield for some reason.

Originally posted by Parab00n
That 5-2 actually worked very well. It pushed blockers into the QBs path and my Powerback runs only in right angles in the backfield for some reason.

Ya I can't use the 5-2 as well as that because i can't seal the edge at all with my dline yet and I have no idea why buy my LB's don't chase as well regardless of 60 pursuit.