Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.

Not sure what you're getting at here. Like I said, I'm not the smartest here, I'm trying to learn too. So help me out if I fucked up somewhere.

I wish we could embed videos because there is a billy Madison scene I'd like to embed here

you don't have to make 17 posts to respond to 17 people. you can keep pressing quote on different posts, and it will insert it into the post you're already writing (without erasing anything).

Originally posted by -Phaytle-
It's only 3 games a season, but couple that with each team now having a more even chance at winning more games by being matched with similar opponents instead of weaker or stronger to bring the playoff race closer, and taking the top 4 and it just solves what everyone bitches about.

Every team has 33% chance to win every game.

Whether that % goes up or down is because the builders/coordinators have damaged their own chances.

Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.
Originally posted by Asheme
my man, figure out the power of multi quoting.

Like that?

Originally posted by Asheme
you don't have to make 17 posts to respond to 17 people. you can keep pressing quote on different posts, and it will insert it into the post you're already writing (without erasing anything).

Yeah, yesterday I was on an epinephrine booster and just responding to each post as soon as I read them before going through the whole thread. Kinda did clutter shit up. But I cleaned the house up, lol. btw, not an excuse, I did that wrong and probably made things harder for other people, thanks for letting me know.


Originally posted by Jampy 2.0
Every team has 33% chance to win every game.

Whether that % goes up or down is because the builders/coordinators have damaged their own chances.

The ladder using elo says otherwise.

*double post

Originally posted by Asheme
you don't have to make 17 posts to respond to 17 people. you can keep pressing quote on different posts, and it will insert it into the post you're already writing (without erasing anything).

I disagree.

1 post replying to 17 different people is terrible form unless you can answer all 17 people with one reply.

Just as each paragraph should be kept on point, each post should be on point.

Originally posted by Time Trial
I disagree.

1 post replying to 17 different people is terrible form unless you can answer all 17 people with one reply.

Just as each paragraph should be kept on point, each post should be on point.

I can answer 17 people with one reply

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/534754/homer-middle-finger-o.gif

Originally posted by -Phaytle-
The ladder using elo says otherwise.

ladder rank doesn't determine the outcome of the game

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
ladder rank doesn't determine the outcome of the game



Of course not, and ladder rank doesn't determine elo either. But as I understand from reading a bit on elo and Nib's explanations (smart man), each team has a calculated chance to win, and that helps in determining how much elo each team wins or loses. Not sure on that though.

But if everyone just blindly accepted that everyone has a 33% then why are people not happy being stuck in divisions where they think the other teams don't offer competition? If you matched teams with like records, thereby also more closely matching the skill level of those coords, then yeah, you coem closer to a 33% split.

Originally posted by Time Trial
I disagree.

1 post replying to 17 different people is terrible form unless you can answer all 17 people with one reply.

Just as each paragraph should be kept on point, each post should be on point.

I suppose I could have mixed the two, maybe combining like posts into one bunch of replies to cut down on the total number of replies to keep things a little cleaner. Some people get confused one way, and some the other way :/ I try to be as direct and thorough as possible, some people don't like to read it all though.

Originally posted by Time Trial
I disagree.

1 post replying to 17 different people is terrible form unless you can answer all 17 people with one reply.

Just as each paragraph should be kept on point, each post should be on point.
well you think forums are called folders you're clearly not to be trusted, are you?

LOL

Man I totally just had a burly shit come out. Fucker made me feel like I was reborn.