Originally posted by RaphaneKnight
You might want to carefully reread what I wrote What I stated was that Maine suffered from inactive agents which resulted in bad builds.
Originally posted by RaphaneKnight
we suffered from inactive agents and bad builds due to mistakes by some of our agents
I am no language expert but the first statement implies that all the bad builds were all due to inactives. The second one implies that in addition too inactive builds there were also some mistakes made by agents that resulted in bad builds. So I took your advice and carefully reread.....turns out you are full of it......but hey nice try
Originally posted by RaphaneKnight
I said we played well despite of those bad builds and hold our own against FG which pretty much in the same page with my philosophy regards to game planning playing a bigger role.
But you lost and the excuse for losing was they had better builds and Jkid had the advantage of building all the players. But hey your superior game planning kept it close.......Doesn't matter the simple fact is you were either beaten by better builds or you were out game planned by Jkid or both.
I see your dilemma. Either state that you were beaten by better builds (which is against a point you were trying to make). Or admit that you were out game planned. Which your ego can't take..........
Here I put this in bold for you.............
I bevo05 as both the DC and OC of the UT Pimps in S20 was beaten several times (including but not limited to the Gold Final and the Addicts final) by Maine. In my opinion I was beat by both superior game planning from RK and better builds from all the agents on Maine
See it is not too hard to admit. Nobody will think any less of you. You will still be great............
lalalalalalalalalaalal isn't this game fun......
You might want to carefully reread what I wrote What I stated was that Maine suffered from inactive agents which resulted in bad builds.
Originally posted by RaphaneKnight
we suffered from inactive agents and bad builds due to mistakes by some of our agents
I am no language expert but the first statement implies that all the bad builds were all due to inactives. The second one implies that in addition too inactive builds there were also some mistakes made by agents that resulted in bad builds. So I took your advice and carefully reread.....turns out you are full of it......but hey nice try
Originally posted by RaphaneKnight
I said we played well despite of those bad builds and hold our own against FG which pretty much in the same page with my philosophy regards to game planning playing a bigger role.
But you lost and the excuse for losing was they had better builds and Jkid had the advantage of building all the players. But hey your superior game planning kept it close.......Doesn't matter the simple fact is you were either beaten by better builds or you were out game planned by Jkid or both.
I see your dilemma. Either state that you were beaten by better builds (which is against a point you were trying to make). Or admit that you were out game planned. Which your ego can't take..........
Here I put this in bold for you.............
I bevo05 as both the DC and OC of the UT Pimps in S20 was beaten several times (including but not limited to the Gold Final and the Addicts final) by Maine. In my opinion I was beat by both superior game planning from RK and better builds from all the agents on Maine
See it is not too hard to admit. Nobody will think any less of you. You will still be great............
lalalalalalalalalaalal isn't this game fun......