Warrior General Games

In S1, which generally doesn't matter because teams were still loaded with CPU players, and nobody really knew what they were doing yet, we beat you 14-7
In S2, we beat you 29-3.
In S3, we beat you 30-20.
In S4, we beat you 174-0

So pretty much the best that you can claim is that, while we always beat you, sometimes we beat you by as little as 7-10 points, but the other half of the time we pretty much crush you. That's what you're going to hang your hat on? Alright then, whatever floats your boat.

Seriously though, what is it with every year having some owner from one of the shitty alpha teams suddenly freaking out and declaring that the whole league sucks? If OPL is so bad, then why are you incapable of building a team that can break the 6 win barrier here? Awfully odd way to express an inferiority complex. As for how we'd stack up against SA Pro, we'll see how the leagues stack up pretty shortly. I'm sure that SA Pro is awfully good, and I think that OPL is very good too. I'm really curious to see how it will go.

Man, this thread reeks of asshole now. Thanks Drachir.

Originally posted by OMGWTF
Man, this thread reeks of asshole now. Thanks Drachir.

Word.

Originally posted by BradyFTW
In S1, which generally doesn't matter because teams were still loaded with CPU players, and nobody really knew what they were doing yet, we beat you 14-7
In S2, we beat you 29-3.
In S3, we beat you 30-20.
In S4, we beat you 174-0

So pretty much the best that you can claim is that, while we always beat you, sometimes we beat you by as little as 7-10 points, but the other half of the time we pretty much crush you. That's what you're going to hang your hat on? Alright then, whatever floats your boat.

Seriously though, what is it with every year having some owner from one of the shitty alpha teams suddenly freaking out and declaring that the whole league sucks? If OPL is so bad, then why are you incapable of building a team that can break the 6 win barrier here? Awfully odd way to express an inferiority complex. As for how we'd stack up against SA Pro, we'll see how the leagues stack up pretty shortly. I'm sure that SA Pro is awfully good, and I think that OPL is very good too. I'm really curious to see how it will go.

Nothing like riling things up. Aussie actually has made the playoffs so no big deal. It's just a game not a big whoop. You are correct that there are some good teams in both leagues as I was just stirring the pot. We will see here shortly which league is better or will it really be that way? I mean upsets do happen. What do they say? "Any Given Sunday!" or in this case "Any Given Every Other Day!"

All I know is that I rather play in the OPL, where you are pretty much the only classless douche bag I am aware of, rather then SA, where guys like you seem to be the rule rather then the exception.

Likely teams participating from both regions. (current)

Oceania

Alpha
1. West Scranton
2. Tonga
3. Mean Machine
4. East Coast
5. Wagga
6. N.E.

Zeta
1. IC
2. Gods
3. Kava Sharks
4. Heat
5. Melbourne
6. Nites

*************************************************

South America

Second () = IMO Rank of team in S.A.

ALPHA
1. Santiago (6-0) (1)
2. Cabs (6-0) (3)
3. Brazilian Cardinals (4-2) (10)
4. Wop-Wops (5-1) (7)
5. Guardians (2-4) (8)

ZETA
1. Wall Knights (6-0)(4)
2. Donkies (5-1) (5)
3. Monkies (6-0) (2)
4. Porto Allegre (5-1) (6)
5. Kai(5-1) (9)
6. Carnales (3-3) (11)

Originally posted by Drachir

Nothing like riling things up.

Yeah, but when you're just pissing into the wind it's posturing. You don't actually have anything to stand on, so your words are hollow. If I were you I'd shut my mouth until I'd actually done something.

Yeah, go ahead and count NEBP in. We've kicked it around in the team forum a bit, and the response has been positive pretty much across the board.

Originally posted by nautilus
Likely teams participating from both regions. (current)

Oceania

Alpha
1. West Scranton
2. Tonga
3. Mean Machine
4. East Coast
5. Wagga
6. N.E.

Zeta
1. IC
2. Gods
3. Kava Sharks
4. Heat
5. Melbourne
6. Nites

*************************************************

South America

Second () = IMO Rank of team in S.A.

ALPHA
1. Santiago (6-0) (1)
2. Cabs (6-0) (3)
3. Brazilian Cardinals (4-2) (10)
4. Wop-Wops (5-1) (7)
5. Guardians (2-4) (8)

ZETA
1. Wall Knights (6-0)(4)
2. Donkies (5-1) (5)
3. Monkies (6-0) (2)
4. Porto Allegre (5-1) (6)
5. Kai(5-1) (9)
6. Carnales (3-3) (11)


So which one of you wants an ass whippin?

Originally posted by ImTheScientist
Originally posted by nautilus

Likely teams participating from both regions. (current)

Oceania

Alpha
1. West Scranton
2. Tonga
3. Mean Machine
4. East Coast
5. Wagga
6. N.E.

Zeta
1. IC
2. Gods
3. Kava Sharks
4. Heat
5. Melbourne
6. Nites

*************************************************

South America

Second () = IMO Rank of team in S.A.

ALPHA
1. Santiago (6-0) (1)
2. Cabs (6-0) (3)
3. Brazilian Cardinals (4-2) (10)
4. Wop-Wops (5-1) (7)
5. Guardians (2-4) (8)

ZETA
1. Wall Knights (6-0)(4)
2. Donkies (5-1) (5)
3. Monkies (6-0) (2)
4. Porto Allegre (5-1) (6)
5. Kai(5-1) (9)
6. Carnales (3-3) (11)


So which one of you wants an ass whippin?


You dont want any of this!

Looks like SA PRO is still short one team. Once we have a 12 v 12 set, we can work out a system to matching the teams up.

Originally posted by SCACE
Looks like SA PRO is still short one team. Once we have a 12 v 12 set, we can work out a system to matching the teams up.

I thought we were going to have it odd number of teams so that we could have a clear cut winner with NO tiebreakers. Well we may still have to have a tiebreaker in case one of the games ends in a tie but it would be easier to have an odd number of teams to avoid a tiebreaker.

Originally posted by Drachir
Originally posted by SCACE

Looks like SA PRO is still short one team. Once we have a 12 v 12 set, we can work out a system to matching the teams up.

I thought we were going to have it odd number of teams so that we could have a clear cut winner with NO tiebreakers. Well we may still have to have a tiebreaker in case one of the games ends in a tie but it would be easier to have an odd number of teams to avoid a tiebreaker.

There will be no need for a tiebreaker.

Man, there is some real smack being thrown around in here. Kinda like it. Let's get this thing rolling!!

To get this think rolling, I pm'd Havoc on either Oceania/S.A. to send over 3 teams. The receiving region would matchup each with a team from its region. Then next round the other regions would send and they would be matched. This would go on until all matches are set. We can then start scheduling.



Thoughts?