User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > General Discussion > The "Random crap that isn't worth a thread" thread
Page:
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
yeah, from what notions of math I have, I would be inclined to say that +3 is bigger then -6. But I would trust you more then I on this stuff lol.
 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
8.1 x 10^-6 is pretty tiny brah
 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
negative exponents doesnt just make the number negative
 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
exponent magnitude respects negative numbers

10^-6 is less than 10^2
Edited by Deathblade on Sep 4, 2013 00:12:29
 
blackdog3377
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Deathblade
8.1 x 10^-6 is pretty tiny brah


yea 10^-6 = .000001
 
Vuijox
offline
Link
 
Does anyone know what happens when two full-blown sociopaths interact with each other?
 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Vuijox
Does anyone know what happens when two full-blown sociopaths interact with each other?


they form a fraternity
 
Venkman
offline
Link
 
the question asked: rank by magnitude. in my mind, that absolutely takes into account the sign of the exponent. 10^3 is five magnitudes of order GREATER than 10^-2. I think that by saying 'not in least to greatest order', they are saying that 9.0x10^6 is equivalent to 8.1x10^6, since they are both within the same order of magnitude.

but yes, when ranking by magnitude, the sign of the exponent matters. think of it this way, too, you're talking about factors of 10 in this situation, something that is equal to -3 factors of 10 (0.001)is definitely less than something that is 2 factors of 10 (100)
thinking about it just in terms of the absolute value of the order of magnitude serves no purpose that I can think of.


ed: I thought of a purpose right after hitting post: if you're working with metric conversions, then just knowing the absolute value of the order of magnitude would tell you how many places to move the decimal point. you would still need to know the sign to tell you which direction to move the point
Edited by seths99 on Sep 4, 2013 08:43:38
Edited by seths99 on Sep 4, 2013 08:42:51
Edited by seths99 on Sep 4, 2013 06:34:06
 
Caveman69
offline
Link
 
jesus.you know kids are going to preschool at 3 now.news to me(again services like this are not often available in a sandtrap)

opinions?too early?not early enough? i will probably be enrolling my kid.
 
Butternuts
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Caveman69
jesus.you know kids are going to preschool at 3 now.news to me(again services like this are not often available in a sandtrap)

opinions?too early?not early enough? i will probably be enrolling my kid.


3am or pm? if am too early imo
 
rams78110
ROIT
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Caveman69
jesus.you know kids are going to preschool at 3 now.news to me(again services like this are not often available in a sandtrap)

opinions?too early?not early enough? i will probably be enrolling my kid.


Too early for pre-school. Will end up being a daycare. 3 year olds are not the most calm and receptive to classroom lecture learning.
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Caveman69
jesus.you know kids are going to preschool at 3 now.news to me(again services like this are not often available in a sandtrap)

opinions?too early?not early enough? i will probably be enrolling my kid.


If you can home school him a bit so he's not behind other kids his age when he joins school you shouldn't have to register him to pre-school.
 
blackdog3377
offline
Link
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montessori_education

I went to one of these all the way up until first grade. Same with my brother. I remember them being a lot of fun and that I was ahead of all my class mates that went to public school pre-k/K
 
rams78110
ROIT
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Deathblade
negative exponents doesnt just make the number negative


This is where I was going wrong, you and Seths99 and quidjibo to an extent hit on it, thanks guys. My mind was just clouded enough to equate the negative exponent to a negative number.
 
Caveman69
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by issacar
If you can home school him a bit so he's not behind other kids his age when he joins school you shouldn't have to register him to pre-school.


well,i am already involved quite a bit during the day. and i work 4-10s or 3-13s just so i can have more time with her. obviously this is coming from a dad but i think she is on par and even ahead in most cases.i just liked the idea of someone more certified teaching my daughter twice a week.plus my girl kinda needs more social development.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.