Warrior General Games

Originally posted by James1985
Yea and in 14 years that game has changed its rules how many times?

ive changed the rules to Super Mario Brothers a shit ton of times through college.

Originally posted by joe
Are we getting any new Offense plays???

+100000

Originally posted by Ahrens858
i provided the ever so important tl;dr version
How many times do I have to tell you that you're thinking of the wrong thread?

Originally posted by jdbolick

How many times do I have to tell you that you're thinking of the wrong thread?

once. what the hell thread am i thinking of?

Originally posted by jdbolick

No need to answer logic. Don't you know? I'm just a troll, or at least that's what people tell themselves when they want to avoid responding to any of my points.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers


Wow. I'd love to have DD's balls in my business.

T

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by jdbolick


People aren't looking for an advantage. They're looking for:

1) A way to avoid going through the pointless and annoying exercise that Bort calls the "financial system."

and

2) A way to pay for everyone's equipment so you don't have a guy who spent $60+ on his player somehow being less than he should be simply because equipment is so ludicrously expensive.


^ this. a small advantage may come with that, but so be it when you make the financial system as bad as it is.

Originally posted by tsherr
Wow. I'd love to have DD's balls in my business.

T

sounds like a gay Adult Porn business...

Originally posted by bhall43
sounds like a gay Adult Porn business...

How'd you guess?

T

Originally posted by mikeandbrooke07
Originally posted by mikeandbrooke07

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers


No. A total reset won't happen.

Originally posted by mikeandbrooke07


and why not? whats the reasoning for not doing it?





Because it's a total 'fuck you' to people who have spent the last year building dots that are just now maturing.

Originally posted by Gart888
Because it's a total 'fuck you' to people who have spent the last year building dots that are just now maturing.

Why don't you think they won't just say that, then?

T

Originally posted by jdbolick

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3794350

bah

good call

Originally posted by jdbolick

People aren't looking for an advantage. They're looking for:

1) A way to avoid going through the pointless and annoying exercise that Bort calls the "financial system."

and

2) A way to pay for everyone's equipment so you don't have a guy who spent $60+ on his player somehow being less than he should be simply because equipment is so ludicrously expensive.


2) With the new system changing the need for EQ....there is no reason to have to reward teams that are sitting on lumps of cash and big stadiums.

1) I agree, however shouldn't all teams at the same level of competition be given the same resources to compete?

Why should my team as a S15 demotion ($1,500,000 cash and no stadium) be placed up against a S14 demotion with a full stadium and $60m in the bank? Do you not see the unfairness inherent in that decision?

If these rules are good enough for a new demotion, they are good enough for everyone.