Warrior General Games

Originally posted by beerbaron

3. also kensham nothing against you, but it seems kind of funny that you back up the somewhat reserved ken shamrock. I would think you like a character like Tito Ortiz. I got to respect ken, but didnt Tito beat him every time. (I have a feeling those are some fighting words.)


Yes those are fighting words. Ken Shamrock is old and that is the ONLY reason he lost to Tito. Tito is a little arrogant prick that needs to learn a lesson. I want to see a Tito vs. Iceman fight.

Originally posted by Kensham
Originally posted by beerbaron


3. also kensham nothing against you, but it seems kind of funny that you back up the somewhat reserved ken shamrock. I would think you like a character like Tito Ortiz. I got to respect ken, but didnt Tito beat him every time. (I have a feeling those are some fighting words.)


Yes those are fighting words. Ken Shamrock is old and that is the ONLY reason he lost to Tito. Tito is a little arrogant prick that needs to learn a lesson. I want to see a Tito vs. Iceman fight.

Even more lulz! It makes sense now - you are following in the footsteps of one of mma's worst fighters.

Ken Shamrock was/is a pretty bad mma fighter; in fact his brother is much better. Ken doesn't have much of a clue when it comes to anything, relied completely on power (which he lost as he got old) and never quite had it when it came to complex submissions. In summary, he is nothing more than a meat head that has a temper tantrum problem.

Tito, the punk that he is, beat him consistantly from the simple fact that Ken doesn't know how to breach a closed defense and is too afraid to take a punch. Watching those matches is kind of disappointing. But Tito is done too. Guys don't last that long in mma because once they peak, their bodies begin to let them down and it isn't like they are rocket scientists so it is difficult for them to learn anything new.

It is a good thing Mir is getting back into form - that accident was a tradjedy. The guy is smart, knows his stuff and not afraid to take his lumps.

Now give an exciting Tank Abbott or Bob Sapp match, totally different story. That is real fighting.

Tans.

Tank Abott is fun to wath but he is fucking retarded when it comes to fighting. He runs in fists up and going for the KO. He has NO strategy he is just a simple hard hitter.

lost 3 times. And Tito did fight the iceman, twice, and lost both times. Tito is great. Hes great. Hes a fighter and a showman.

Originally posted by beerbaron
lost 3 times. And Tito did fight the iceman, twice, and lost both times. Tito is great. Hes great. Hes a fighter and a showman.

Tito is an embaressment to the MMA. He sucks and he takes advantage of his youth. He is a terrible fighter.

Originally posted by beerbaron
1. whatever

2. are the rams the favorite (or dont canadians spell it favourite, that is a misspelling) in the west?

3. this has been discussed

4. I guarentee we get above the 4th place prediction (am I allowed to say that?) DISCUSS! Those are some fighting words too right there.

2 and 4 havent been answered/discussed

My avatar will consistantly change so I can give others a hard time.

Originally posted by Kensham
Originally posted by beerbaron

lost 3 times. And Tito did fight the iceman, twice, and lost both times. Tito is great. Hes great. Hes a fighter and a showman.

Tito is an embaressment to the MMA. He sucks and he takes advantage of his youth. He is a terrible fighter.

This I think is the first time you actually came close to making a correct statement.

I will say Tito was a good entertainer but that was about it. His tactical fighting ability relied on an early stun whih was his downfall against more experienced fighters.

Tans.

Thank you Tans for agreeing with me on at least something.

Originally posted by Kensham
Thank you Tans for agreeing with me on at least something.

Doesn't mean anything - you still have the competence of a sea cucumber.


Tans.

You are an asshole and there is nothing I can do about it so you are right about that. We are going to have a good game though so you better prepare.

Originally posted by tansien
Originally posted by Kensham

Thank you Tans for agreeing with me on at least something.

Doesn't mean anything - you still have the competence of a sea cucumber.


Tans.



Sea cucumber, hilarious. Gameplan better next time kensham, tans wins this round.

Originally posted by Kensham
You are an asshole and there is nothing I can do about it so you are right about that. We are going to have a good game though so you better prepare.


Your opinion - which means nothing at all.

Prepare for what? We consider that an off game so our guys will all be playing on relaxed and are thinking aobut putting in our punter as starting qb - maybe swap the o and d lines to make it interesting.

We can't think of anything else to try and get it be somewhat even; this isn't taking into account the 'Kensham Mismanagement Factor' which may require us hiring some level 1 cpu players and having them start at all off positions...


Tans.

Originally posted by Kensham
My offense scored one touchdown against the Rams when noone elses offenses did. Quoted from the bottom of page 3.

I would like to point out that your "Offense" did NOT score a touchdown. http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=77174 Look at the game again buddy, and see the fact that our kicker scored the points.

The first field goal was from them Fumbling to us on their own 28 yard line... definately your game plan.

The second field goal was when se started a drive at mid-field from a kick return.

If you look back at the game, our returners were awesome, and we started at mid-field or BETTER a LOT. The Breakdown:
Our own territory: 4 times, 11, 12.5, 20, 39
Mid-field: 3 times, 49.5, 50, 49.5
Thier territory: 4 times, 47, 45, 40.5, 28

Also, we had fewer rushing yards against them than any other team they played in the playoffs.

Sorry Kensham, I can't exactly say your awesome game-planning was what got us those field-goals....

Originally posted by mortalq2
Originally posted by Kensham

My offense scored one touchdown against the Rams when noone elses offenses did. Quoted from the bottom of page 3.

I would like to point out that your "Offense" did NOT score a touchdown. http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=77174 Look at the game again buddy, and see the fact that our kicker scored the points.

The first field goal was from them Fumbling to us on their own 28 yard line... definately your game plan.

The second field goal was when se started a drive at mid-field from a kick return.

If you look back at the game, our returners were awesome, and we started at mid-field or BETTER a LOT. The Breakdown:
Our own territory: 4 times, 11, 12.5, 20, 39
Mid-field: 3 times, 49.5, 50, 49.5
Thier territory: 4 times, 47, 45, 40.5, 28

Also, we had fewer rushing yards against them than any other team they played in the playoffs.

Sorry Kensham, I can't exactly say your awesome game-planning was what got us those field-goals....

Ouch..And that my friend, is what you call..

OWNEDD!!
http://menacingmorons.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/owned.jpg
PWNED!!!
http://www.chrisohara.org/pwned.jpg
And......GOT SERVED!
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y11/drloomis3/Cat-YouJustGotServed.jpg