Warrior General Games

Originally posted by PeeJJK
Always have, and always will be an early boost guy. I can't stand wasting 4 seasons of a dot's life by slow building. zzzzzzzzzzz

Like you said, always fun to smack people up the ladder and win some trophies.

S100 was great with us, Mayan, KC Comets, etc.

I have done both and early boost is mush more entertaining for the first 4 or 5 seasons, then you hit Pro League 1 or 2 and reality sets in which is not fun. Just depends on how competitive you want to be in Pro if that's your end goal.

Originally posted by BLARYPALOOZA
I have done both and early boost is mush more entertaining for the first 4 or 5 seasons, then you hit Pro League 1 or 2 and reality sets in which is not fun. Just depends on how competitive you want to be in Pro if that's your end goal.

ACS just figured out that all you have to do is put your block TEs at WR and throw screens all game to be a pro OC. Might as well open a school too while you're at it.

Originally posted by PeeJJK
ACS just figured out that all you have to do is put your block TEs at WR and throw screens all game to be a pro OC. Might as well open a school too while you're at it.

I see what you did there.

Originally posted by Koowahn
Already have played and beat in playoffs or tourney when they gameplan. Our kryptonite in playoffs is WAR MACHINE and it took them declining for us to finally beat them lol

good luck this season then.

Originally posted by SmithsterSmitty
and all built early boost, not late.


Imagine how better could be if they boost late.

Originally posted by BLARYPALOOZA
I have done both and early boost is mush more entertaining for the first 4 or 5 seasons, then you hit Pro League 1 or 2 and reality sets in which is not fun. Just depends on how competitive you want to be in Pro if that's your end goal.

I have done both too. Build an entire team both ways. Now have proof which method is better.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
I have done both too. Build an entire team both ways. Now have proof which method is better.

Alamo 14-1

Athens 5-9

which way is better

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
I have done both too. Build an entire team both ways. Now have proof which method is better.

Whether you love them or hate them btw, early boosting Playmakers greatly outperformed you guys in PRO. There is another example.

I think it is such a small bump to building and it is 93% coordinating that matters (as long as you don't build soley to win the first levels - if you do that you are cooked). An example of our early build has a 105, 102 and 90 for example which top coordinators would have no problem setting up for success.

Actually I was talking about this team: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=10025

surely is not in Pro yet but as you can see, Playfakers can win anyone

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=62172

Athens 14-1

Playfakers 11-4

Don't compare Empire this season against a well build roster like Alamo. Next season our roster will be better and will see... and still our Pro record against Comets is 2-1.

EDIT: Surely now that Playfakes boosted and has 5 levels advantage outcome can be different in the playoffs but in Pro everyone will be the same.

Originally posted by SmithsterSmitty
Whether you love them or hate them btw, early boosting Playmakers greatly outperformed you guys in PRO. There is another example.



won zero trophies like us. Not a good example.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
good luck this season then.

Thanks we will need it. Hopefully we can win the pro tourney and walk away with some sort of gold

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
won zero trophies like us. Not a good example.

If you don’t see the difference between 14-1 and no luck in playoffs yet or not even .500 then nothing I can do to convince you

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Actually I was talking about this team: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=10025

surely is not in Pro yet but as you can see, Playfakers can win anyone

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=62172

Athens 14-1

Playfakers 11-4

Don't compare Empire this season against a well build roster like Alamo. Next season our roster will be better and will see... and still our Pro record against Comets is 2-1.

EDIT: Surely now that Playfakes boosted and has 5 levels advantage outcome can be different in the playoffs but in Pro everyone will be the same.

I know you have some intense dislike of Playmakers but he has won playoff game in Pro boosting early and you haven’t boosting later. Until you are 12-4 in Pro and win, playmakers and Alamo win

Originally posted by SmithsterSmitty
If you don’t see the difference between 14-1 and no luck in playoffs yet or not even .500 then nothing I can do to convince you

success of Alamo has nothing to do with early boosting. They have good coords, maybe overall are a better team than Empire. I was speaking about early boosting Odyssey team that build 49 dots and now the second wave with late boost that build 47 dots. I can see the difference in teams that same person builds the same dots using the same build method. Can't compare apples with strawberries.

Originally posted by SmithsterSmitty
I know you have some intense dislike of Playmakers but he has won playoff game in Pro boosting early and you haven’t boosting later. Until you are 12-4 in Pro and win, playmakers and Alamo win

This doesn't prove anything. Maybe could win if was late booster or maybe our dots could win if Ryan coordinated the team. Are so many variables in this discussion. Btw, Ryan teams, War Machine and other that won WL titles are late boosters. Don't think an early booster won anything yet!

Alamo regular season success (13-3 x3 and 12-4) records in pro have nothing to show for it other than a silv last season.

We are just some stat padders trying to climb the HOF.