Warrior General Games

Originally posted by dsl20
TJ,

London finished With one win, HHWC with 6, and Cherokee with 7. How do you see demotion in there?


TJ is just being a bit funny today, between his "unlimited CL size" idea no one else likes, and pretending #2 seed Sno which made WL playoffs by 3 wins more than the #5 seed HHWC was a drop away from demotion.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
TJ is just being a bit funny today, between his "unlimited CL size" idea no one else likes, and pretending #2 seed Sno which made WL playoffs by 3 wins more than the #5 seed HHWC was a drop away from demotion.



TJ doesn't care for C/L league, he said that numerous times in the past about how boring it is to have a plateau dot after it is finished being built.
I believe TJ likes playing in the lower leagues as he is building his dots like others do also.

I'm done arguing. Nothing is going to change anyway. We can't even get A.i. presets added from 3 seasons ago.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Please no to adding an additional league. Adding another league weakens the game. You SHOULD have talent in AAA to make the ladder work. If you add another Pro league, you end up with cpu teams in AAA which is what we want to avoid. AAA is competitive and fun, keep it that way. Cream rises to the top.


Not always. Don't want to offend people but if you check all CL teams will find what I mean compared to some AAA Teams. Just saying...

Originally posted by Tomcic
Here is the forms:
https://forms.gle/MFEwMWXJ5ZtR2mqo8

Feel free to give your vote:
There are two options to choose from:
Option A: Stay as is (1 CL(0/4), 1 Pro(4/4), 2 AAA(4/8), 2AA(8/0) with Promotion/Demotion
Option B: 2-Tier ProCL (2 Pro leagues, 4 conferences, 4 Playoff games day 34,36,38,40) (2 Pro(0/8), 2 AAA(8/8), 2AA(8/0) with Promotion/Demotion
https://ibb.co/vvhmcfg
https://ibb.co/3zxpP7n

For Option B, you can make suggestions on the 2nd page.

Thanks and poll will stay open two days, then I will provide Bort the feedback

Results?

8 voted:
bluesman
reddogrw
drewd21
Greywolfmeb
Crash.0
WiSeIVIaN
onemiln09
ewinter43

Which option do you prefer for regular pro leagues (day160+)?
8 responses
Option A: Stay as isOption B: 2-Tier ProCL

Option A:25%
Option B:75%


Some Feedback on Option B:

tag teams owned by a network and put them in different leagues / conference
-Keep 12TM leagues. These people asking for 32 team leagues don't know what they are talking about.

-It's very important that the Pro teams are dynamic (randomize each season). 1 season toughest conference can't be a permanent pergatory. Rivalries will still exist just as much between the 24 Pro teams in 2 leagues, it is fine.

-It would be a HUGE upgrade if we could ban team swaps within the same tier (no changes between leagues/conferences in Pro). RC is correct that new system incentivizes him and others to have 4 teams, one in each conference. By allowing conference swaps you give an advantage to networks with multiple teams not having to face each other in the early playoffs, and incentivizing having a team in every conference. Should be randomized then no changes. (only league swaps allowed are between tiers like AA to Pro).

-I am still personally a big fan of 3 teams make the playoffs per conference (1 bye), 4th team stays in Pro, 5th/6th team demote. That's a pretty big change so I doubt you get the votes. But no reason this "new" system has to have 16 playoff teams total, as 12 teams would be sufficient. Having a bye week added and only 3 teams per conference make playoffs would make the regular season matter more. As-is, people are going to coast to the playoffs as the #4 seed since seeding completely does not matter in any way, which is stupid. Doing this removes the incentive for top tier teams to gameplan AT ALL for regular season games by making it too easy to make the playoffs with zero incentive to be the #1 seed...

-----------------------------------------------------
Figured we will just stay the course then with the current format and keep it as is since only 8 responses. I didnt vote since I created the poll.

VOTED

Don’t know how to do it in this spreadsheet.

Too late to vote? I'm joining this late, my $0.02...

I think any option should include CL expanding to eight teams per conference so that there is more room for movement upward, I like option two.

Edit - I didn't actually vote as I flatly refuse to EVER have a Google account.

Sorry I thought I had voted before, but I was on my phone and had troubles. I'm pretty sure I got it this time. By the way, thanks for taking the time to set this stuff up Tom.

FYI Tom, when I did my poll, like half of GLB didn't want to do google accounts, so I opened it to voting without an account.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
FYI Tom, when I did my poll, like half of GLB didn't want to do google accounts, so I opened it to voting without an account.

Exactly, not creating one just to vote as that is assanine!

Would have voted B, but it was pulling my work email, not personal one. Didn't see a way to switch it.

Originally posted by Brewnoe
Would have voted B, but it was pulling my work email, not personal one. Didn't see a way to switch it.

At the very top of the poll underneath the description, it should have your email address with a "Switch Accounts" link next to it. I do have multiple accounts linked so I'm not sure if this is still the case if you only have 1 set up.

I'll trust the experts and call a life line.