I bet it was peeti.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > No update to the Change Log?
o The Boss x
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
$20 says I get Hawaii next ladder game... any takers?
We have a 50 chem QB, in the past you said that was worse than having multiple players on 50 chem. You should be begging to get us early.
$20 says I get Hawaii next ladder game... any takers?
We have a 50 chem QB, in the past you said that was worse than having multiple players on 50 chem. You should be begging to get us early.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by o The Boss x
We have a 50 chem QB, in the past you said that was worse than having multiple players on 50 chem. You should be begging to get us early.
must have missed that
what happened to your old QB?
Originally posted by FairForever
Zombie Apocalypse is a good team... but the fact they have one combined ladder/league trophy in 5 seasons should probably indicate their strength.
considering that ladder trophy was last season and they have won 17 of their last 19 (one of those losses by 1), I think most people would definitely consider them one of the best few Pros from last season
We have a 50 chem QB, in the past you said that was worse than having multiple players on 50 chem. You should be begging to get us early.
must have missed that
what happened to your old QB?
Originally posted by FairForever
Zombie Apocalypse is a good team... but the fact they have one combined ladder/league trophy in 5 seasons should probably indicate their strength.
considering that ladder trophy was last season and they have won 17 of their last 19 (one of those losses by 1), I think most people would definitely consider them one of the best few Pros from last season
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 21, 2015 16:18:33
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 21, 2015 10:41:39
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 21, 2015 10:41:09
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 21, 2015 10:40:10
Captain_Red_Neck
offline
offline
I don't want to see chemistry go, but instead get an overhaul.
Also would like to see the Easy Going trait get an overhaul.
Also would like to see the Easy Going trait get an overhaul.
jhiggseiu14
offline
offline
Originally posted by Captain_Red_Neck
I don't want to see chemistry go, but instead get an overhaul.
Also would like to see the Easy Going trait get an overhaul.
seriously....you have no issues with the way chemistry takes away from our players
I don't want to see chemistry go, but instead get an overhaul.
Also would like to see the Easy Going trait get an overhaul.
seriously....you have no issues with the way chemistry takes away from our players
Detroit Leos
offline
offline
I do not mind the concept of chemistry but with a user base that is dwindling and dealing with a larger chance of turnover at positions due to that it is hard for me to support the feature despite liking the intended purpose of it. Something should probably be tweaked with it at this point at the very least...
I've said it before - but it just needs a major tweak.
offseason signing: start @ 90
1st 5 days of season: 75
6-10: 60
11-20: 30
21-roster lock: 0
offseason signing: start @ 90
1st 5 days of season: 75
6-10: 60
11-20: 30
21-roster lock: 0
Aeir
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
I've said it before - but it just needs a major tweak.
offseason signing: start @ 90
1st 5 days of season: 75
6-10: 60
11-20: 30
21-roster lock: 0
I've said before as well, 90 until Day 1 of the season, then -5 per day until 0.
I got slammed for that idea though, hmm.
I've said it before - but it just needs a major tweak.
offseason signing: start @ 90
1st 5 days of season: 75
6-10: 60
11-20: 30
21-roster lock: 0
I've said before as well, 90 until Day 1 of the season, then -5 per day until 0.
I got slammed for that idea though, hmm.
Originally posted by Aeir
I've said before as well, 90 until Day 1 of the season, then -5 per day until 0.
I got slammed for that idea though, hmm.
Waaay different idea there.../sarcasm
I've said before as well, 90 until Day 1 of the season, then -5 per day until 0.
I got slammed for that idea though, hmm.
Waaay different idea there.../sarcasm
Myrik_Justiciar
offline
offline
Originally posted by jhiggseiu14
seriously....you have no issues with the way chemistry takes away from our players
I think he means it needs to be fixed, just not removed from the game.
Maybe start the base off season from 50% instead to 75% or one of the other suggestions these guys listed.
seriously....you have no issues with the way chemistry takes away from our players
I think he means it needs to be fixed, just not removed from the game.
Maybe start the base off season from 50% instead to 75% or one of the other suggestions these guys listed.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
I think he means it needs to be fixed, just not removed from the game.
Maybe start the base off season from 50% instead to 75% or one of the other suggestions these guys listed.
What is it you like so much about chemistry?
It takes me a while to get a feel for newly added players as it is. Right now they just can't do anything. I am so close to walking away right now because I'm penalized for signing guys without teams to replace players that hit legend. I feel bad signing guys to a aweful team. It's just not right.
Originally posted by Captain_Red_Neck
I don't want to see chemistry go
Sure easy to say when you have had just one player go beyond pro. Don't own a team or coach a team.
I think he means it needs to be fixed, just not removed from the game.
Maybe start the base off season from 50% instead to 75% or one of the other suggestions these guys listed.
What is it you like so much about chemistry?
It takes me a while to get a feel for newly added players as it is. Right now they just can't do anything. I am so close to walking away right now because I'm penalized for signing guys without teams to replace players that hit legend. I feel bad signing guys to a aweful team. It's just not right.
Originally posted by Captain_Red_Neck
I don't want to see chemistry go
Sure easy to say when you have had just one player go beyond pro. Don't own a team or coach a team.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by drake262
Originally posted by Captain_Red_Neck
I don't want to see chemistry go
You enjoy the easy wins huh?
Originally posted by Captain_Red_Neck
I don't want to see chemistry go
You enjoy the easy wins huh?
MileHighShoes
offline
offline
One of the worst things about chemistry is signing your dot to a new team. You just know that entire next season will be mostly meaningless and a waste of your time. Simply because your HB will be slower, your WR will drop more and get open less, your D-lineman won't get off blocks he normally would and your player in general will just be sluggish. If chemistry affects anything, it should just affect morale loss, and consistency... NOTHING ELSE. Your player shouldn't be physically slower or weaker, or less agile. Your D-lineman shouldn't forget how to shove off blocks, your TE shouldn't be incapable of lead blocking.
Just make it affect consistency, so maybe on a few bigger plays they might slip, or have trouble with a few rolls... but don't make it so shitty and overbearing that it ruins the entire game.
Either that or start it at 90 or something high in the off-season. This is the equivalent of playing a multi-player racing game, and them including a random failure mechanic so that sometimes the race will start and your car will just be broken and unable to race at all and you have to forfeit the race, quit and start over because hurr durr it's realistic. We come here to compete against each other, not against the game mechanics.
It really should come down to who has the best tactics, who has the best built team for those tactics, and a little bit of luck introduced by rolls and a random number generator. Not which team has been together the longest. None of us are here for that level of realism, we all want it to be player vs player and coach vs. coach.
Just make it affect consistency, so maybe on a few bigger plays they might slip, or have trouble with a few rolls... but don't make it so shitty and overbearing that it ruins the entire game.
Either that or start it at 90 or something high in the off-season. This is the equivalent of playing a multi-player racing game, and them including a random failure mechanic so that sometimes the race will start and your car will just be broken and unable to race at all and you have to forfeit the race, quit and start over because hurr durr it's realistic. We come here to compete against each other, not against the game mechanics.
It really should come down to who has the best tactics, who has the best built team for those tactics, and a little bit of luck introduced by rolls and a random number generator. Not which team has been together the longest. None of us are here for that level of realism, we all want it to be player vs player and coach vs. coach.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























