You're definitely due!
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Vet Ladder 4/14
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
You're definitely due!
Just wait! We're going all ultra high % short passes. There's no way it'll fail. Gonna run sooo many plays per drive, we'll win the TOP battle. Gonna render those shell safeties worthless, totally taking them out of the game!
Huh? What's that?... Oh, we'll probably end every drive with a fumble or INT doing this?
Oh.
Well scratch that plan! Bombs deeep!
You're definitely due!
Just wait! We're going all ultra high % short passes. There's no way it'll fail. Gonna run sooo many plays per drive, we'll win the TOP battle. Gonna render those shell safeties worthless, totally taking them out of the game!
Huh? What's that?... Oh, we'll probably end every drive with a fumble or INT doing this?
Oh.
Well scratch that plan! Bombs deeep!
Edited by Galithor on Apr 22, 2015 11:49:42
Edited by Galithor on Apr 22, 2015 11:48:46
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
In my opinion:
because if I basically play the 2-25 teams not in my league -- there are a ton of TERRIBLE games in there....which means it is difficult for me (#1) to be unseated since I'm getting so many simple games.
In addition - for teams in the top 10 to get more than 1 crack at me (and each other) would introduce a little more variability potential in the ladder.
Well, you do know it could also be the complete opposite and you play the gutted teams more while you could never play teams like DD or RR, which you havent faced yet
In my opinion:
because if I basically play the 2-25 teams not in my league -- there are a ton of TERRIBLE games in there....which means it is difficult for me (#1) to be unseated since I'm getting so many simple games.
In addition - for teams in the top 10 to get more than 1 crack at me (and each other) would introduce a little more variability potential in the ladder.
Well, you do know it could also be the complete opposite and you play the gutted teams more while you could never play teams like DD or RR, which you havent faced yet
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
it is difficult for me (#1) to be unseated since I'm getting so many simple games
yea, I'd say you'd have to lose at least 2 or 3 games more than us this season for us to take that #1 spot... same record this season, but your ELO last season should keep you at #1 the rest of this season unless you guys really fall apart.
The distance between Minn and us is much smaller than us and #3 right now
it is difficult for me (#1) to be unseated since I'm getting so many simple games
yea, I'd say you'd have to lose at least 2 or 3 games more than us this season for us to take that #1 spot... same record this season, but your ELO last season should keep you at #1 the rest of this season unless you guys really fall apart.
The distance between Minn and us is much smaller than us and #3 right now
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
super quiet here lately but hopefully an awesome game today brings some talk http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/178575
Edited by USC_Trojans on Apr 23, 2015 22:50:24
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
super quiet here lately but hopefully an awesome game today brings some talk http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/178575
Owner is inactive and GM hasn't logged in for 4 days.
super quiet here lately but hopefully an awesome game today brings some talk http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/178575
Owner is inactive and GM hasn't logged in for 4 days.
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rob.
Owner is inactive and GM hasn't logged in for 4 days.
wow tezed next on the list of people leaving, i hope not though same defense they ran vs the stunners
Owner is inactive and GM hasn't logged in for 4 days.
wow tezed next on the list of people leaving, i hope not though same defense they ran vs the stunners
Edited by USC_Trojans on Apr 23, 2015 23:41:03
bhall43
offline
offline
It is a sad state of affairs when nobody cares about MBR and RGLB...then again its a sadder state of affairs that people really didnt care much that Stunners had lost to Run GLB and then later nobody gave a crap that the Stunners had a close game with Run Defenders...like vet in general is just kinda a who gives a fucking shit imo. Like I find myself not even caring how anyone does beyond me. That is pretty bad. Rookie I look at every team in the top 10. Vet is like who cares who won because nobody changes places.
peeti
offline
offline
Yeah...exactly what I said last season. Rookie season is the most exciting and yeah...it could relate to the constant changes in ranking. Maybe we should really think about a seasonly reset of ELO :/
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
super quiet here lately but hopefully an awesome game today brings some talk http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/178575
Ground Assault is totally legit... automatically a top 5 next season once they are in Vet (assuming they don't drop people). Best team coming into Vet since Minn
super quiet here lately but hopefully an awesome game today brings some talk http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/178575
Ground Assault is totally legit... automatically a top 5 next season once they are in Vet (assuming they don't drop people). Best team coming into Vet since Minn
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Apr 24, 2015 04:44:36
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
Ground Assault is totally legit... automatically a top 5 next season once they are in Vet (assuming they don't drop people). Best team coming into Vet since Minn
eeeeh, maybe. We've lost some games that Minnesota didn't when they came up. Competition may be better, but we're not a team without flaws. Our choices on defense are fun, but leave us with some vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
Ground Assault is totally legit... automatically a top 5 next season once they are in Vet (assuming they don't drop people). Best team coming into Vet since Minn
eeeeh, maybe. We've lost some games that Minnesota didn't when they came up. Competition may be better, but we're not a team without flaws. Our choices on defense are fun, but leave us with some vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
Edited by Galithor on Apr 24, 2015 05:46:15
Galithor
offline
offline
6 legends players on the roster. Handed Romo his ass:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/168516
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/168516
Originally posted by Galithor
eeeeh, maybe. We've lost some games that Minnesota didn't when they came up. Competition may be better, but we're not a team without flaws. Our choices on defense are fun, but leave us with some vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
What are you talking about? I specifically remember USC telling me ground assault was better than Minnesota ever was...was ever going to be....and that Ground Assault had won way more games than Minnesota ever did....
eeeeh, maybe. We've lost some games that Minnesota didn't when they came up. Competition may be better, but we're not a team without flaws. Our choices on defense are fun, but leave us with some vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
What are you talking about? I specifically remember USC telling me ground assault was better than Minnesota ever was...was ever going to be....and that Ground Assault had won way more games than Minnesota ever did....
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
What are you talking about? I specifically remember USC telling me ground assault was better than Minnesota ever was...was ever going to be....and that Ground Assault had won way more games than Minnesota ever did....
He might be right in the end. He might not. All depends on how the S* heavy roster finishes up the builds. We're not likely to be as "on plan" with builds across the board as a mostly single owner type team in the end.
What are you talking about? I specifically remember USC telling me ground assault was better than Minnesota ever was...was ever going to be....and that Ground Assault had won way more games than Minnesota ever did....
He might be right in the end. He might not. All depends on how the S* heavy roster finishes up the builds. We're not likely to be as "on plan" with builds across the board as a mostly single owner type team in the end.
Edited by Galithor on Apr 24, 2015 07:51:57
Originally posted by Galithor
He might be right in the end. He might not. All depends on how the S* heavy roster finishes up the builds. We're not likely to be as "on plan" with builds across the board as a mostly single owner type team in the end.
tough to make that case in my opinion
Stunners: #1 at every level roookie through vet (took 2 seasons to claim it at vet)
Ground Assault: #4 in seasoned. #3 in sophomore. #2 in Journeyman. outside the top 5 I guess in rookie. Currently #1 in pro
He might be right in the end. He might not. All depends on how the S* heavy roster finishes up the builds. We're not likely to be as "on plan" with builds across the board as a mostly single owner type team in the end.
tough to make that case in my opinion
Stunners: #1 at every level roookie through vet (took 2 seasons to claim it at vet)
Ground Assault: #4 in seasoned. #3 in sophomore. #2 in Journeyman. outside the top 5 I guess in rookie. Currently #1 in pro
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
