Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Xavori
And everything I said is still true.

From today:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57626/2052053

See WR3?

See WR3 lined up uncovered?

See the FS chasing desperately after WR3 at the snap, and failing to get there?

See the fact that it was Jampy that called it, and not someone who actually pays attention?

Eventually, you're going to learn I'm never wrong

...MO has players in set positions, they don't move over for coverage.

Did you watch the other numerous plays where that same WR3 is ineffective as shit?

Same drive:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57626/2052084

And it's b00n who called it, who owns a team that you couldn't ever compete with; not jampy.

Originally posted by Parab00n
...MO has players in set positions, they don't move over for coverage.

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Now go back and look exactly what I said that Corndog was trying to take a dig at, look at my reply, and maybe see the connection between the two.

A man coverage "pass" defense where the defenders don't actually line up in man coverage is bad. I'm totally in support of bhall's suggestion that the play get recategorized an inside run defense because that's how the defense actually plays.

Originally posted by o The Boss x
Did you watch the other numerous plays where that same WR3 is ineffective as shit?

Same drive:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57626/2052084

And it's b00n who called it, who owns a team that you couldn't ever compete with; not jampy.

Uh, I know you're his illegitimate love child and all, but b00ndoggle reset his team because he was getting spanked pretty regularly by me. I shut him out in the playoffs of season 2. I beat him at the end of season 3 to kill his playoff chances before Lost Lounge went on to win the championship of the hardest league GLB2 has seen to date.

There is absolutely nothing he's ever going to say that will bother me given that history

Originally posted by Xavori
Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Now go back and look exactly what I said that Corndog was trying to take a dig at, look at my reply, and maybe see the connection between the two.

A man coverage "pass" defense where the defenders don't actually line up in man coverage is bad. I'm totally in support of bhall's suggestion that the play get recategorized an inside run defense because that's how the defense actually plays.



lol if it's so obvious why are you saying its bugged. It has already been stated that it was a play with set coverages and the new man coverage woudln't effect it...this was season 2.

Originally posted by Xavori
Uh, I know you're his illegitimate love child and all, but b00ndoggle reset his team because he was getting spanked pretty regularly by me. I shut him out in the playoffs of season 2. I beat him at the end of season 3 to kill his playoff chances before Lost Lounge went on to win the championship of the hardest league GLB2 has seen to date.

There is absolutely nothing he's ever going to say that will bother me given that history

You finished 3-3 against my worst team I've coached with yet, congrats. Let me know when you actually can coach a team to #1 because all I've seen from you is a lot of 3rd and 4th best teams.

Originally posted by Parab00n
lol if it's so obvious why are you saying its bugged. It has already been stated that it was a play with set coverages and the new man coverage woudln't effect it...this was season 2.

So your defense of the play is that it's not bugged because apparently there was a post 2 seasons ago by a dev that said Middle Overload plays different than every other pass/run defense in the game and the way a reasonable person would expect a man coverage pass defense to work?

[sarcasm]
Wow. I'm totally persuaded now. You've convinced me that everyone playing the game, and every person that joins the game in the future will understand at a glance that Middle Overload is the greatest thing ever, and that bhall was a moron for ever suggesting that it get labeled correctly.
[/sarcasm]

Originally posted by Xavori
So your defense of the play is that it's not bugged because apparently there was a post 2 seasons ago by a dev that said Middle Overload plays different than every other pass/run defense in the game and the way a reasonable person would expect a man coverage pass defense to work?

[sarcasm]
Wow. I'm totally persuaded now. You've convinced me that everyone playing the game, and every person that joins the game in the future will understand at a glance that Middle Overload is the greatest thing ever, and that bhall was a moron for ever suggesting that it get labeled correctly.
[/sarcasm]

You are a even worse poster than normal when you are this angry. If you are expecting to understand anything at a glance you are dumber than I originally thought.

Originally posted by Parab00n
You are a even worse poster than normal when you are this angry. If you are expecting to understand anything at a glance you are dumber than I originally thought.



Angry?

Dude, this exchange has been hysterical. You're so bound and determined to disagree with me that you had to jump in and disagree with me when I explained why my original post was spot on, showed that it was spot it, and explained that if that's how the play is going to run, it should be classified the same as other plays that work like that. The only part of that you could possibly disagree with is that last part because that's the only part that's opinion, not obvious fact.

'Course it wouldn't surprise me if really disagree that the game should provide accurate information to players. After all, that 3-3 record and your former #1 spot have one big thing in common. You won against people who hadn't figured the game out quite yet. As more people figure the game out, your apparent luck-based success has faded pretty quickly. If I was flailing around as badly as you do, I guess I'd want people to not understand the game for as long as possible as well.

Can I just save you a heap of you making idiotic responses to anything I ever post in the future with these simple guidelines:
1) I never get angry in an argument. I love to argue.
2) I really, really never get angry when someone talks trash with me. I love trash talking even more than arguing.
3) You suck at both arguing and trash talking which makes it even funnier when you try.

Originally posted by Xavori


Angry?

Dude, this exchange has been hysterical. You're so bound and determined to disagree with me that you had to jump in and disagree with me when I explained why my original post was spot on, showed that it was spot it, and explained that if that's how the play is going to run, it should be classified the same as other plays that work like that. The only part of that you could possibly disagree with is that last part because that's the only part that's opinion, not obvious fact.

'Course it wouldn't surprise me if really disagree that the game should provide accurate information to players. After all, that 3-3 record and your former #1 spot have one big thing in common. You won against people who hadn't figured the game out quite yet. As more people figure the game out, your apparent luck-based success has faded pretty quickly. If I was flailing around as badly as you do, I guess I'd want people to not understand the game for as long as possible as well.

Can I just save you a heap of you making idiotic responses to anything I ever post in the future with these simple guidelines:
1) I never get angry in an argument. I love to argue.
2) I really, really never get angry when someone talks trash with me. I love trash talking even more than arguing.
3) You suck at both arguing and trash talking which makes it even funnier when you try.

tldr

Originally posted by Xavori


Angry?

Dude, this exchange has been hysterical. You're so bound and determined to disagree with me that you had to jump in and disagree with me when I explained why my original post was spot on, showed that it was spot it, and explained that if that's how the play is going to run, it should be classified the same as other plays that work like that. The only part of that you could possibly disagree with is that last part because that's the only part that's opinion, not obvious fact.

'Course it wouldn't surprise me if really disagree that the game should provide accurate information to players. After all, that 3-3 record and your former #1 spot have one big thing in common. You won against people who hadn't figured the game out quite yet. As more people figure the game out, your apparent luck-based success has faded pretty quickly. If I was flailing around as badly as you do, I guess I'd want people to not understand the game for as long as possible as well.

Can I just save you a heap of you making idiotic responses to anything I ever post in the future with these simple guidelines:
1) I never get angry in an argument. I love to argue.
2) I really, really never get angry when someone talks trash with me. I love trash talking even more than arguing.
3) You suck at both arguing and trash talking which makes it even funnier when you try.

nerd

sup?

With all this fighting over mid overload you guys missed the 3rd upset today http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/57793 this was a pretty fun game too.

AGD2D finally beats SF....


I'm barely involved,

oh well.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
AGD2D finally beats SF....


I'm barely involved,

oh well.

This is why my base offense is always my anti-MO offense now. You never know who's gonna go full MO for a game against ya now.