Warrior General Games

It's funny that you actually seem reasonable via PM...

As I mentioned there - I was not responsible for setting up any of those scrimms. I had nothing to do with it.

I honestly believe it was a coincidence that my head coach scrimmed you a few times today - I'd guess you show up in our quick scrimm tab since we are reasonably close in ladder.

We get it...AGD2D lost to a Rookie team for one reason or another. Does that need to spill into multiple posts on multiple threads? If you want to keep up the discussion perhaps it can continue via PM or maybe in a private forum?

Let's get this discussion back to anything regarding the new man coverage assignment logic.

Will a blitzing microbort get pulled into a man assignment, or is it only if he's dog blitz?

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
We get it...AGD2D lost to a Rookie team for one reason or another. Does that need to spill into multiple posts on multiple threads? If you want to keep up the discussion perhaps it can continue via PM or maybe in a private forum?

Let's get this discussion back to anything regarding the new man coverage assignment logic.

So your answer was the bring up AGD2D losing to a rookie team in a thread where it hasn't been mentioned? Either very dumb or a well placed troll on the troll.

Funny how this was all a coincidence and it was just my buddy MaddenCoach sending the scrims.

oh the lolz.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
We get it...AGD2D lost to a Rookie team for one reason or another. Does that need to spill into multiple posts on multiple threads? If you want to keep up the discussion perhaps it can continue via PM or maybe in a private forum?

Let's get this discussion back to anything regarding the new man coverage assignment logic.

upvoted and lold

5 wr may have been nearly unstoppable but its better than watching 53 combined sacks in one game. Now you can't throw out of any formation. Is this going to be the norm?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/27470

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307
5 wr may have been nearly unstoppable but its better than watching 53 combined sacks in one game. Now you can't throw out of any formation. Is this going to be the norm?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/27470

you're both idiots for passing so heavily against good pass rushing defenses.

this is just a tactical fail by both OCs, not the sim.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
you're both idiots for passing so heavily against good pass rushing defenses.

this is just a tactical fail by both OCs, not the sim.

What a shock the troll calls me an idiot

Originally posted by cugel
Will a blitzing microbort get pulled into a man assignment, or is it only if he's dog blitz?

Shouldn't no.

Dog blitzes are man -> blitz

Blitzes are just blitz.

Seriously though, LB's need a greater speed penalty hitting a hole through the line if the OL is not pancaked and/or the QB needs to have easier checks to notice blitzers and do something about it

30 sack games by one team is dumb. Games where teams have 250 total yards BETWEEN THEM BOTH after sack negatives is dumb.

Pressure needs to mean more but be harder to get. Hooray for better man coverage but this is getting silly.

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307
What a shock the troll calls me an idiot



don't do idiotic things and you won't be called an idiot?

Originally posted by Parab00n
So your answer was the bring up AGD2D losing to a rookie team in a thread where it hasn't been mentioned? Either very dumb or a well placed troll on the troll.

Honestly, neither. That argument seems to be going on everywhere and I made the mistake of not looking more closely at what scrims were being discussed here. Either way, arguing about the results of scrims in this thread does not contribute to the thread.

Originally posted by Parab00n
A little more to it than that.

Nothing to see here

jampy is just trolling... all dogs go has essentially ruined the sim

I've been running scrimmages and watching sims the whole way through and honestly right now, if two evenly matched teams play right now, whoever runs the play more wins... simple as that.

Zorp and some of the other top teams are running that play 90-95% of the time against all 3WR, 4WR, and 5WR formations, and racking up 20ish sacks a game. The play needs to get nerfed by either starting the LBs further back or pressing them together tighter, or just remove the play completely.

People aware of it haven't been mentioning it on the forums as they are nervous opposing teams will learn and implement the play just like they do, but this information NEEDS TO GET OUT THERE. The sooner it's recognized as a serious issue, the sooner it gets fixed