Warrior General Games

Originally posted by JohnRowdy
Originally posted by JerryRice

Originally posted by corav




Uhm, that #1 running back spot is no longer yours; it's ROSTOV's!!!! Whoo hoo! Your top two RB only outgained our top two RB by about 30yds total. I would say that is not a bad attack for either team. I congratulate you on your great offensive season. Good luck in the playoffs.

Congrats, I was wrong. GL in the playoffs. But....

Your opponents' combined records: 19-44-1
Our opponents' combined records: 32-32

I think 'nuff said.


I would say something but this thread Has gone on way to long, And has become Pretty Pointless. Well the Playoffs are here and the way they pan out will tell us everything we need to know

It's 6 pages already, what's 1 more post? Please... enlighten us on how you think you're better than us despite us outplaying you against common opponents?

Edit! 7 PAGES!!!

lol.....you can't go by common opponents. The old "if A beats B, and B beats C, then A should beat C" thing doesn't work. For the record, we never said we were better than you until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us. In fact, it is titled "A power in the West". We should have posted one that said "A power in the East", then you could have done all of your back patting there. I never said you guys weren't any good. I think you guys have a good team, which is why you are undefeated. You, however, always claim some reason why we aren't as good as you are. You can't prove it until we play each other. Plus, everyone has their own opinion, so let them have it, they let you have yours.

Originally posted by corav
lol.....you can't go by common opponents. The old "if A beats B, and B beats C, then A should beat C" thing doesn't work. For the record, we never said we were better than you until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us. In fact, it is titled "A power in the West". We should have posted one that said "A power in the East", then you could have done all of your back patting there. I never said you guys weren't any good. I think you guys have a good team, which is why you are undefeated. You, however, always claim some reason why we aren't as good as you are. You can't prove it until we play each other. Plus, everyone has their own opinion, so let them have it, they let you have yours.

You absolutely can compare games against common opponents as a means of comparing 2 teams, to say otherwise would be ridiculous.

And "until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us." which was day 1 of the Canada A season, which is pretty much the entire timeline for this discussion. We never said you sucked until we said it in this thread either.

Originally posted by THE PWNER
Originally posted by corav

lol.....you can't go by common opponents. The old "if A beats B, and B beats C, then A should beat C" thing doesn't work. For the record, we never said we were better than you until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us. In fact, it is titled "A power in the West". We should have posted one that said "A power in the East", then you could have done all of your back patting there. I never said you guys weren't any good. I think you guys have a good team, which is why you are undefeated. You, however, always claim some reason why we aren't as good as you are. You can't prove it until we play each other. Plus, everyone has their own opinion, so let them have it, they let you have yours.

You absolutely can compare games against common opponents as a means of comparing 2 teams, to say otherwise would be ridiculous.

And "until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us." which was day 1 of the Canada A season, which is pretty much the entire timeline for this discussion. We never said you sucked until we said it in this thread either.

You cannot compare teams with each other based on common opponents. For example, the Cowboys defeated the Giants in the regular season, while the Giants defeated the Patriots in the Super Bowl. Would you say then that the Cowboys are better than the Patriots? The Patriots defeated the Cowboys in Dallas during the regular season......your argument is not logical. You can't compare two teams based on their common opponents. To say you can is ridiculous.

Originally posted by corav
Originally posted by THE PWNER

Originally posted by corav


lol.....you can't go by common opponents. The old "if A beats B, and B beats C, then A should beat C" thing doesn't work. For the record, we never said we were better than you until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us. In fact, it is titled "A power in the West". We should have posted one that said "A power in the East", then you could have done all of your back patting there. I never said you guys weren't any good. I think you guys have a good team, which is why you are undefeated. You, however, always claim some reason why we aren't as good as you are. You can't prove it until we play each other. Plus, everyone has their own opinion, so let them have it, they let you have yours.

You absolutely can compare games against common opponents as a means of comparing 2 teams, to say otherwise would be ridiculous.

And "until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us." which was day 1 of the Canada A season, which is pretty much the entire timeline for this discussion. We never said you sucked until we said it in this thread either.

You cannot compare teams with each other based on common opponents. For example, the Cowboys defeated the Giants in the regular season, while the Giants defeated the Patriots in the Super Bowl. Would you say then that the Cowboys are better than the Patriots? The Patriots defeated the Cowboys in Dallas during the regular season......your argument is not logical. You can't compare two teams based on their common opponents. To say you can is ridiculous.

When it's the only correlation between 2 teams, that is the ONLY way you can compare them. Obviously the Cowgirls played the Patricia's, so there's no need to look elsewhere for a comparison... but when you don't have a head to head game, it is completely standard in all sports, games, etc to look at common opponents as a basis of comparison.

Originally posted by THE PWNER
Originally posted by corav

Originally posted by THE PWNER


Originally posted by corav



lol.....you can't go by common opponents. The old "if A beats B, and B beats C, then A should beat C" thing doesn't work. For the record, we never said we were better than you until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us. In fact, it is titled "A power in the West". We should have posted one that said "A power in the East", then you could have done all of your back patting there. I never said you guys weren't any good. I think you guys have a good team, which is why you are undefeated. You, however, always claim some reason why we aren't as good as you are. You can't prove it until we play each other. Plus, everyone has their own opinion, so let them have it, they let you have yours.

You absolutely can compare games against common opponents as a means of comparing 2 teams, to say otherwise would be ridiculous.

And "until you guys posted under this thread that you were better than us." which was day 1 of the Canada A season, which is pretty much the entire timeline for this discussion. We never said you sucked until we said it in this thread either.

You cannot compare teams with each other based on common opponents. For example, the Cowboys defeated the Giants in the regular season, while the Giants defeated the Patriots in the Super Bowl. Would you say then that the Cowboys are better than the Patriots? The Patriots defeated the Cowboys in Dallas during the regular season......your argument is not logical. You can't compare two teams based on their common opponents. To say you can is ridiculous.

When it's the only correlation between 2 teams, that is the ONLY way you can compare them. Obviously the Cowgirls played the Patricia's, so there's no need to look elsewhere for a comparison... but when you don't have a head to head game, it is completely standard in all sports, games, etc to look at common opponents as a basis of comparison.

NOt sure being the comparision between both divisions is fair. Yeah we played you both but we also blew both games. If the jackalopes and kings go again next round I expect a better game. Then who ever wins that game will face the east. If you guys can win out in the east then this can get settled.

Originally posted by THE PWNER


When it's the only correlation between 2 teams, that is the ONLY way you can compare them. Obviously the Cowgirls played the Patricia's, so there's no need to look elsewhere for a comparison... but when you don't have a head to head game, it is completely standard in all sports, games, etc to look at common opponents as a basis of comparison.


The New England Patriots Beat the Baltimore Ravens by 3, But Seattle Beat Baltimore by 21, So according to what you said That means Seattle was better then New England? Haha, Yeah that doesnt work.

Originally posted by JohnRowdy
Originally posted by THE PWNER



When it's the only correlation between 2 teams, that is the ONLY way you can compare them. Obviously the Cowgirls played the Patricia's, so there's no need to look elsewhere for a comparison... but when you don't have a head to head game, it is completely standard in all sports, games, etc to look at common opponents as a basis of comparison.


The New England Patriots Beat the Baltimore Ravens by 3, But Seattle Beat Baltimore by 21, So according to what you said That means Seattle was better then New England? Haha, Yeah that doesnt work.


I'm from Seattle... so yes

Well you never know, The Seahawks may have been better, But since they never played we shall never know.