And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
JKates
offline
offline
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
LouDawg
offline
offline
Here's the link to the backup QB, who, like I stated earlier, was traded after week 6. And, like I said before, his numbers while on TriCity showed a better rate of production than any other QB.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=322442
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=322442
LouDawg
offline
offline
Originally posted by JKates
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
Which question was that? When I get all emotional in my thinking, I not only have a hard time with numbers, but I also can't remember things.
What your question "Who's the MVP for season 3?" Then I think we both agree is Mahvelous Marvin.
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
Which question was that? When I get all emotional in my thinking, I not only have a hard time with numbers, but I also can't remember things.
What your question "Who's the MVP for season 3?" Then I think we both agree is Mahvelous Marvin.
Last edited Jul 12, 2008 13:42:34
JKates
offline
offline
Look, I believe you on the backup QB. But I'm not going for the strawman sideshow.
I didn't want to start this, and I've already finished it. I'm just waiting for you to realize it.
Care to answer my question yet?
I didn't want to start this, and I've already finished it. I'm just waiting for you to realize it.
Care to answer my question yet?
LouDawg
offline
offline
Originally posted by JKates
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
I meant that Smith's opponents were inferior to Haggler's.
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
I meant that Smith's opponents were inferior to Haggler's.
LouDawg
offline
offline
I answered your question. We both agree that Haggler rules. I'm glad we settled that. Let's go get a beer.
JKates
offline
offline
Originally posted by LouDawg
Originally posted by JKates
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
Which question was that?
That's what I thought.
[sarcasm]On a positive note for you, my opinion of you just went up because you've been arguing out of ignorance and not just stupidity.[/sarcasm]
Originally posted by JKates
Originally posted by LouDawg
And let's not forget that you keep wanting to compare rates of production, but you keep leaving off the most important qualifier.....Smith's rate of production was higher against inferior opponents.
Who's isnt?
Care to answer my question yet?
Which question was that?
That's what I thought.
[sarcasm]On a positive note for you, my opinion of you just went up because you've been arguing out of ignorance and not just stupidity.[/sarcasm]
JKates
offline
offline
Originally posted by LouDawg
I answered your question. We both agree that Haggler rules. I'm glad we settled that. Let's go get a beer.
Are you old enough to drink? You "argue" like my little cousin that isn't.
I answered your question. We both agree that Haggler rules. I'm glad we settled that. Let's go get a beer.
Are you old enough to drink? You "argue" like my little cousin that isn't.
JKates
offline
offline
I'm out for a while. You guys take care and come up with something better, although I don't think Bort will let you hack the stats to even them up.
LouDawg
offline
offline
You mean Bort won't let us hack the stats so that Smith has as many sacks as Haggler? Wow. I am bummed.
vrshah
offline
offline
Actually let's play this game of yours--if Haggler played backup part of the season, that is a knock AGAINST HAGGLER.
That means he put up stats against 2nd stringers while CG was beating down on starting OL.
And CGs #s against starters given the snaps Haggler had, would be insane.
That means he put up stats against 2nd stringers while CG was beating down on starting OL.
And CGs #s against starters given the snaps Haggler had, would be insane.
mykel
offline
offline
the funny thing about you Jkates is you keep "projecting" (oops, used the word again) what you are doing compared to what I am saying. you have changed you arhument a few times here. From cG has the best stats, to he has the best projected stats to rate of production. now I ask you....which one of your arguments do youj want to stick with once and for all, I want to clear on which level you want me to enlighten you at, my guess is you are going to use rate of production so after I get done giving my daughter a bath (who, strangely enough, at 15 months seems more capable of comprehending the basics and sticking to one topic than you....damn you remind me of bill "can you define lie" clinton!) and running my boys to the pool ill address the area in which you are focusing.
hmmm, maybe I should pick up some crayons and use one syllable words to make this easier for you to understand......
hmmm, maybe I should pick up some crayons and use one syllable words to make this easier for you to understand......
Last edited Jul 12, 2008 14:01:40
mykel
offline
offline
Originally posted by vrshah
Actually let's play this game of yours--if Haggler played backup part of the season, that is a knock AGAINST HAGGLER.
That means he put up stats against 2nd stringers while CG was beating down on starting OL.
And CGs #s against starters given the snaps Haggler had, would be insane.
except that my stats INCREASED when I was moved to the starting lineup. gg research!
Actually let's play this game of yours--if Haggler played backup part of the season, that is a knock AGAINST HAGGLER.
That means he put up stats against 2nd stringers while CG was beating down on starting OL.
And CGs #s against starters given the snaps Haggler had, would be insane.
except that my stats INCREASED when I was moved to the starting lineup. gg research!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
