Originally posted by w_alloy
Then in S12 they came up to the WL and went 12-4 with hardly any roster changes, better than they did in S10. So obviously the only conclusion is that CPL is better than the WL.
I'm talking about comparing consecutive seasons. In S10, Mayan got blown the fuck out by the best teams in CPL, lost to some other teams that didn't make the WL the following season, and barely beat three more teams. In S11, Mayan didn't have any close games in SLAP except for Valhalla and SOAP. The difference was night and day. It's not like Mayan's S10 losses were close and their S11 wins were close.
Originally posted by
And you won't even admit that 14-2 in SAPL was better than 2-14 in CPL. Lol. I'm done with this silly debate.
Dude, if you're going to lie about the things I say then don't even bother posting. Of course 14-2 in any Pro conference is better than 2-14 in CPL. I have to guess since it's not even clear where you're getting this angry, irrational statement from, but I suppose this has to do with my comment about Providence vis-a-vis Valhalla two seasons ago. Note that I didn't say that Providence was better than Valhalla two seasons ago, merely that I think we would have had a better chance to beat you then. I don't think we'd have any chance now, since in the last two seasons you've become a ridiculously dominant force.
GMathiasf & crazy454 insisted that levels explain why Providence struggled in the CPL two seasons ago, and not the fact that the CPL continued to have quality depth. I pointed out that if levels were the culprit, then Valhalla would have had similar struggles, but you didn't. That and the Mayan comparison certainly suggest that CPL had much better overall quality than SLAP.
Then in S12 they came up to the WL and went 12-4 with hardly any roster changes, better than they did in S10. So obviously the only conclusion is that CPL is better than the WL.
I'm talking about comparing consecutive seasons. In S10, Mayan got blown the fuck out by the best teams in CPL, lost to some other teams that didn't make the WL the following season, and barely beat three more teams. In S11, Mayan didn't have any close games in SLAP except for Valhalla and SOAP. The difference was night and day. It's not like Mayan's S10 losses were close and their S11 wins were close.
Originally posted by
And you won't even admit that 14-2 in SAPL was better than 2-14 in CPL. Lol. I'm done with this silly debate.
Dude, if you're going to lie about the things I say then don't even bother posting. Of course 14-2 in any Pro conference is better than 2-14 in CPL. I have to guess since it's not even clear where you're getting this angry, irrational statement from, but I suppose this has to do with my comment about Providence vis-a-vis Valhalla two seasons ago. Note that I didn't say that Providence was better than Valhalla two seasons ago, merely that I think we would have had a better chance to beat you then. I don't think we'd have any chance now, since in the last two seasons you've become a ridiculously dominant force.
GMathiasf & crazy454 insisted that levels explain why Providence struggled in the CPL two seasons ago, and not the fact that the CPL continued to have quality depth. I pointed out that if levels were the culprit, then Valhalla would have had similar struggles, but you didn't. That and the Mayan comparison certainly suggest that CPL had much better overall quality than SLAP.