Originally posted by PatricktheDookie
Eddie Royal was a pretty good value.
ya my plan was to take him next pick
Eddie Royal was a pretty good value.
ya my plan was to take him next pick
Forum > Pro Leagues > Fantasy Football Draft Results
joemiken
offline
offline
Originally posted by DrunkenOne
ries and mcclain doesnt vulture TDs that shouldnt matter
Which is why I'm steering clear of Baltimore's HBs. Same story w/ Tampa and Oakland. Who knows who'll be the workhorse and who'll be the red zone stud for those teams. Except Oakland...we know who their red zone stud will be...no one...they'll never be in the red zone this season.
ries and mcclain doesnt vulture TDs that shouldnt matter
Which is why I'm steering clear of Baltimore's HBs. Same story w/ Tampa and Oakland. Who knows who'll be the workhorse and who'll be the red zone stud for those teams. Except Oakland...we know who their red zone stud will be...no one...they'll never be in the red zone this season.
Edited by joemiken on Sep 8, 2009 14:42:45
jvguballa
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gart888
someone hold me and tell me johnson and barber won't be that bad. please.
The only thing real bad about that team is Kyle Orton/Trent Edwards. Everything is else is actually p great for a 16 team league.
someone hold me and tell me johnson and barber won't be that bad. please.
The only thing real bad about that team is Kyle Orton/Trent Edwards. Everything is else is actually p great for a 16 team league.
Originally posted by jvguballa
The only thing real bad about that team is Kyle Orton/Trent Edwards. Everything is else is actually p great for a 16 team league.
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
The only thing real bad about that team is Kyle Orton/Trent Edwards. Everything is else is actually p great for a 16 team league.
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
jvguballa
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gart888
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
Nothing wrong with that strategy. Only thing I see that really would have stung is Hasselbeck getting taken two spots before you picked Julius Jones. Nothing you can do about it though.
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
Nothing wrong with that strategy. Only thing I see that really would have stung is Hasselbeck getting taken two spots before you picked Julius Jones. Nothing you can do about it though.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gart888
parker at 61 could prove to be the pick of the draft
Matt Jones could be too. But he probably won't be. Fuckin hate Parker.
parker at 61 could prove to be the pick of the draft
Matt Jones could be too. But he probably won't be. Fuckin hate Parker.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by DrunkenOne
coles [...] #1
I think Chris Henry has more chance of being the go-to guy by the end of the season than Coles does.
Originally posted by DrunkenOne
coles [...] #1
I think Chris Henry has more chance of being the go-to guy by the end of the season than Coles does.
Originally posted by jvguballa
Originally posted by Gart888
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
Nothing wrong with that strategy. Only thing I see that really would have stung is Hasselbeck getting taken two spots before you picked Julius Jones. Nothing you can do about it though.
yeah, i wanted Eli or Hasselbeck there. Then they both got drafted so i figured go with a 3rd HB.
Originally posted by Gart888
i figure if i go week by week on matchup it won't be that bad.
it's always been my M.O. to take 2 bad QBs late in a draft instead of a decent one earlier.
Nothing wrong with that strategy. Only thing I see that really would have stung is Hasselbeck getting taken two spots before you picked Julius Jones. Nothing you can do about it though.
yeah, i wanted Eli or Hasselbeck there.
Then they both got drafted so i figured go with a 3rd HB. DrunkenOne
offline
offline
parker might be the worst starting RB in the league. Easily the most overrated though.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by DrunkenOne
parker might be the worst starting RB in the league. Easily the most overrated though.
Can't really argue with this.
parker might be the worst starting RB in the league. Easily the most overrated though.
Can't really argue with this.
Asheme
offline
offline
Originally posted by DrunkenOne
parker might be the worst starting RB in the league. Easily the most overrated though.
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
parker might be the worst starting RB in the league. Easily the most overrated though.
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
DrunkenOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
"might be." Jones, Benson, and jamal lewis were also awful last year. All of them also played for 3 of the worst teams in the league last year. Seattle and Cinci both lost their QBs and started bums, while Seattle also started randoms at WR. Parker played for a super bowl champion and was significantly less effective than Mewelde Moore. So ya, its close, except no one thinks that Julius Jones is any good, whereas a lot of ppl consider Parker a top 10 back.
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
"might be." Jones, Benson, and jamal lewis were also awful last year. All of them also played for 3 of the worst teams in the league last year. Seattle and Cinci both lost their QBs and started bums, while Seattle also started randoms at WR. Parker played for a super bowl champion and was significantly less effective than Mewelde Moore. So ya, its close, except no one thinks that Julius Jones is any good, whereas a lot of ppl consider Parker a top 10 back.
Edited by DrunkenOne on Sep 8, 2009 16:36:23
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
Yeah whoever starts for Seattle probably wins. Think Parker would come right after though.
I'd like to introduce you to Julius Jones.
Yeah whoever starts for Seattle probably wins. Think Parker would come right after though.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
