I say someone makes a ballot and one owner/gm per team gets to fill it out.
Whatsdafus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Spar10sby13
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
ok!!! Scarpped that old power rankings. I made a formula (that me and a few math nerds worked on) that includes backups. i tested it out and it works. i like it a hell of alot more then just the starters. So when i get home after work and doing the mothers day stuff with my family i will begin to plug in the #'s.
There are a few things to know.
- Since alot of teams like to keep different amounts of players for different positions, some backups wont be counted. so if you have 4 TE's, dont expect to be rated that deep. We had to make a limit on the backups to include cause one not everyone has 8 hb's and 2 im already plugging in a shit ton of stats for this to work. I dont need to do this for 3 hours every 2 days for a power ranking on a game.
- The old formula rated a team on 22 positions. This formula will base a team off of 44 positions. To me that gives a deeper indicator of what a team is really putting on the field. On the avg team 1st stringers see about 50 snaps, 2nd stringers will see anywhere from 30 to 40. so we took that into account.
- For this formula, these are the positions that will count.
Offensive - QB1, QB2, HB1, HB2, FB1, FB2, WR1, WR2, WR3, WR4, TE1, TE2, C1, C2, LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, LG1, LG2, RG1, RG2.
Defensive - NT1, NT2, DT1, DT2, LDE1, LDE2, RDE1, RDE2, MLB1, MLB2, LOLB1, LOLB2, ROLB1, ROLB2, CB1, CB2, CB3, CB4, FS1, FS2, SS1, SS2.
So with a TON of teams to get data from and do the formula in their backet, i should (hoping) have these ready before our games tomorrow.
How about if we take into consideration the attributes important for that position (ie for a QB, strength, throwing, vision...etc..)
I think everyone should allow their attributes to be seen by all so we can get a better idea who is really the best and we can get proper power rankings!!
btw...the D.C. Warriors will go ahead and excuse themselves from the power rankings
Yea good luck.
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
ok!!! Scarpped that old power rankings. I made a formula (that me and a few math nerds worked on) that includes backups. i tested it out and it works. i like it a hell of alot more then just the starters. So when i get home after work and doing the mothers day stuff with my family i will begin to plug in the #'s.
There are a few things to know.
- Since alot of teams like to keep different amounts of players for different positions, some backups wont be counted. so if you have 4 TE's, dont expect to be rated that deep. We had to make a limit on the backups to include cause one not everyone has 8 hb's and 2 im already plugging in a shit ton of stats for this to work. I dont need to do this for 3 hours every 2 days for a power ranking on a game.
- The old formula rated a team on 22 positions. This formula will base a team off of 44 positions. To me that gives a deeper indicator of what a team is really putting on the field. On the avg team 1st stringers see about 50 snaps, 2nd stringers will see anywhere from 30 to 40. so we took that into account.
- For this formula, these are the positions that will count.
Offensive - QB1, QB2, HB1, HB2, FB1, FB2, WR1, WR2, WR3, WR4, TE1, TE2, C1, C2, LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, LG1, LG2, RG1, RG2.
Defensive - NT1, NT2, DT1, DT2, LDE1, LDE2, RDE1, RDE2, MLB1, MLB2, LOLB1, LOLB2, ROLB1, ROLB2, CB1, CB2, CB3, CB4, FS1, FS2, SS1, SS2.
So with a TON of teams to get data from and do the formula in their backet, i should (hoping) have these ready before our games tomorrow.
How about if we take into consideration the attributes important for that position (ie for a QB, strength, throwing, vision...etc..)
I think everyone should allow their attributes to be seen by all so we can get a better idea who is really the best and we can get proper power rankings!!
btw...the D.C. Warriors will go ahead and excuse themselves from the power rankings
Yea good luck.
Whatsdafus
offline
offline
Originally posted by redwolfe11
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
ok!!! Scarpped that old power rankings. I made a formula (that me and a few math nerds worked on) that includes backups. i tested it out and it works. i like it a hell of alot more then just the starters. So when i get home after work and doing the mothers day stuff with my family i will begin to plug in the #'s.
There are a few things to know.
- Since alot of teams like to keep different amounts of players for different positions, some backups wont be counted. so if you have 4 TE's, dont expect to be rated that deep. We had to make a limit on the backups to include cause one not everyone has 8 hb's and 2 im already plugging in a shit ton of stats for this to work. I dont need to do this for 3 hours every 2 days for a power ranking on a game.
- The old formula rated a team on 22 positions. This formula will base a team off of 44 positions. To me that gives a deeper indicator of what a team is really putting on the field. On the avg team 1st stringers see about 50 snaps, 2nd stringers will see anywhere from 30 to 40. so we took that into account.
- For this formula, these are the positions that will count.
Offensive - QB1, QB2, HB1, HB2, FB1, FB2, WR1, WR2, WR3, WR4, TE1, TE2, C1, C2, LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, LG1, LG2, RG1, RG2.
Defensive - NT1, NT2, DT1, DT2, LDE1, LDE2, RDE1, RDE2, MLB1, MLB2, LOLB1, LOLB2, ROLB1, ROLB2, CB1, CB2, CB3, CB4, FS1, FS2, SS1, SS2.
So with a TON of teams to get data from and do the formula in their backet, i should (hoping) have these ready before our games tomorrow.
Nice Work! I think this will give a much better ranking.
A questions I eluded to in a previous post...
based on your post I will make an example. You will take LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, which works perfectly if a team has 4 offensive tackles all listed that way on the depth chart. However it is pretty common for a team to have 3 OTs and LOT2 and ROT2 would be the same player. THerefore you would be counting one player twice in your calculations.
I am not sure exactly how to work around that aspect in a fair way. Depending on how many snaps an offense plays, having 1 extra body to rotate is plenty to keep everyone fresh. However a team that has a true "2 deep" should get a little higher ranking over a team one with utility man.
What do you think?
Who ever is sloted in those positions even if it is teh same guy backing up the rot and the lot... he is the stat used.
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
ok!!! Scarpped that old power rankings. I made a formula (that me and a few math nerds worked on) that includes backups. i tested it out and it works. i like it a hell of alot more then just the starters. So when i get home after work and doing the mothers day stuff with my family i will begin to plug in the #'s.
There are a few things to know.
- Since alot of teams like to keep different amounts of players for different positions, some backups wont be counted. so if you have 4 TE's, dont expect to be rated that deep. We had to make a limit on the backups to include cause one not everyone has 8 hb's and 2 im already plugging in a shit ton of stats for this to work. I dont need to do this for 3 hours every 2 days for a power ranking on a game.
- The old formula rated a team on 22 positions. This formula will base a team off of 44 positions. To me that gives a deeper indicator of what a team is really putting on the field. On the avg team 1st stringers see about 50 snaps, 2nd stringers will see anywhere from 30 to 40. so we took that into account.
- For this formula, these are the positions that will count.
Offensive - QB1, QB2, HB1, HB2, FB1, FB2, WR1, WR2, WR3, WR4, TE1, TE2, C1, C2, LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, LG1, LG2, RG1, RG2.
Defensive - NT1, NT2, DT1, DT2, LDE1, LDE2, RDE1, RDE2, MLB1, MLB2, LOLB1, LOLB2, ROLB1, ROLB2, CB1, CB2, CB3, CB4, FS1, FS2, SS1, SS2.
So with a TON of teams to get data from and do the formula in their backet, i should (hoping) have these ready before our games tomorrow.
Nice Work! I think this will give a much better ranking.
A questions I eluded to in a previous post...
based on your post I will make an example. You will take LOT1, LOT2, ROT1, ROT2, which works perfectly if a team has 4 offensive tackles all listed that way on the depth chart. However it is pretty common for a team to have 3 OTs and LOT2 and ROT2 would be the same player. THerefore you would be counting one player twice in your calculations.
I am not sure exactly how to work around that aspect in a fair way. Depending on how many snaps an offense plays, having 1 extra body to rotate is plenty to keep everyone fresh. However a team that has a true "2 deep" should get a little higher ranking over a team one with utility man.
What do you think?
Who ever is sloted in those positions even if it is teh same guy backing up the rot and the lot... he is the stat used.
Angry Buccaneer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
That was one hell of a game, Orlando!
I'm so proud of our defense for keeping your potent offensive attack from scoring TDs. I have a feeling we will meet again...
yeah that was a hell of a game...definitely a defensive battle.
That was one hell of a game, Orlando!
I'm so proud of our defense for keeping your potent offensive attack from scoring TDs. I have a feeling we will meet again...
yeah that was a hell of a game...definitely a defensive battle.
Whatsdafus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cerneo
People should be posting more I am bored.
here play this game... you can do stuff every 2 minutes...
http://www.mafiaunit.com/register.php?referer=788
Kills time inbetween GLB
People should be posting more I am bored.
here play this game... you can do stuff every 2 minutes...
http://www.mafiaunit.com/register.php?referer=788
Kills time inbetween GLB
UMBF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
That was one hell of a game, Orlando!
I'm so proud of our defense for keeping your potent offensive attack from scoring TDs. I have a feeling we will meet again...
It seems only fitting that the Drillers were the ones to end our undefeated season, just as we ended their perfect season last time around. Granted, we still have not actually beat the Drillers...but the games are certainly always close.
Congrats on the win, and I look forward to our next rematch.
That was one hell of a game, Orlando!
I'm so proud of our defense for keeping your potent offensive attack from scoring TDs. I have a feeling we will meet again...
It seems only fitting that the Drillers were the ones to end our undefeated season, just as we ended their perfect season last time around. Granted, we still have not actually beat the Drillers...but the games are certainly always close.
Congrats on the win, and I look forward to our next rematch.
Mass Anarchy
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cerneo
Survivor starts in 2.5 hours, whos gonna watch it?
Ohhh true! I would watch it but I'll be seeing Ironman... muuuuch better
Survivor starts in 2.5 hours, whos gonna watch it?
Ohhh true! I would watch it but I'll be seeing Ironman... muuuuch better
Mass Anarchy
offline
offline
BTW did anyone notice we're the first league in USA A to hit 1000 posts? Good job everyone.
BuddyHorn
offline
offline
The guys that have to leave this division are getting the shaft. We are one of the most active in all of GLB/
Whatsdafus
offline
offline
No one in the game... in any leagues pros, europe, asia... usa has a thread like we do
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.