Originally posted by vladykins
It's OK, Cat, I know you haven't killed anybody yet, but hopefully you'll learn from this and avoid any possible killing of people based on your work in the future.the only thing i'm learning is that some economists have zero math skills.
Originally posted by vladykins
Answer me this: Two guys walk a mile in ten minutes each. quick question, what does the word "each" mean to you?
Originally posted by vladykins
What is the average time per guy? In your world, it is 5mins/guy, nope, wrong again.
Originally posted by vladykins
since you assume time is some fixed, immutable concept. are you sure you know what "immutable" means?
Originally posted by vladykins
In fact, regardless of whether the guys walk at different times or at exactly the same time, the average time spent per guy will always be 10mins/guy? are you asking? first you claim i'd say 5min/guy, now you're saying i'd say 10min/guy? pick story.
Originally posted by vladykins
It doesn't matter if they walked at exactly the same time for a total of 10 minutes together, because each guy experienced 10 minutes of walking. Their total walking time is twenty minutes (time spent by guy1 plus time spent by guy2). omg, total time divided by total guys. this is almost reminiscent of total dudes divided by total time. gosh, imagine that.
also, how are you not noticing that you inverted the term? the original question was in terms of time/dude and you keep rambling about guy/min. do you see how sloppy you are with all this?
Originally posted by vladykins
I can give you examples with students taking tests at the same time wherein your answer would again be ridiculous (60 students taking an hour long test would not have 1min/student). I can give you a thousand examples. and yet not a single relevant one.
Originally posted by vladykins
You made an assumption, nope. rather, the only assumption i made was that by "average" we mean the arithmetic mean.
Originally posted by vladykins
you got called on it, nope. at best, you're embarrassing yourself. at worst, you're violently agreeing with me.
Originally posted by vladykins
and now you just keep trolling anyone who dares to disagree with you must be trolling? is this like how all the girls who turn you down must have been lesbians?
Originally posted by vladykins
to see if we're bored enough to keep pointing out that you made an assumptionagain, the only assumption i made was that by "average" we mean the arithmetic mean.
Originally posted by vladykins
and now are too invested to admit you are wrong. it's like you're trying to troll a mirror.
Originally posted by vladykins
As for your "immutable" definition of time versus duration, since you have provided such helpful links: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=time+versus+durationyou are straight up retarded. a duration is an interval of time. end of story. deal with it.
Originally posted by vladykins
PS: R isn't worth playing with- hell, S Plus isn't either, and they charge for it.i already knew you have no clue what you're talking about, but thanks for confirming it yet again, lol