User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > USA A Leagues > USA A #1 > USA A#1 League thread
Page:
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BuddyHorn
The game will be a good one. It should be the game of the week.


I concur. I'll be disappointed if this one doesn't live up to the hype. I'm optimistic but nervous. That's a tough team y'all have there.

We're getting there and have improved dramatically from last year.... Let's lay it all on the field.

T-Day in May!
 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
So far all offense rankings done for the West... doing west defense and total ranking now...

then will do east and whole league #s
 
BuddyHorn
offline
Link
 
I actually had to do some thinking when GP'n you folks.
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
This is always fun for me. I grew up in Austin.
 
Cerneo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
So far all offense rankings done for the West... doing west defense and total ranking now...

then will do east and whole league #s


irgfxzgfjxjgfhkghkv


You pwn.
 
otmalize
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Cerneo


irgfxzgfjxjgfhkghkv


You pwn.


your keyboard hates you, doesnt it?
 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
I have the west totally done. i kinda hate the #'s cause they dont factor in backups. so just everyone starters. I will work on a formula to include backups..... the current numbers DONT reflect your tactics and your backup so keep that in mind and dont get upset cause some lower ranked teams in the west beat higher.
 
Cerneo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
I have the west totally done. i kinda hate the #'s cause they dont factor in backups. so just everyone starters. I will work on a formula to include backups..... the current numbers DONT reflect your tactics and your backup so keep that in mind and dont get upset cause some lower ranked teams in the west beat higher.


I wants to seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
 
Cerneo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by otmalize
Originally posted by Cerneo



irgfxzgfjxjgfhkghkv


You pwn.


your keyboard hates you, doesnt it?


You have no idea.
 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
Just double checking every box. almost down with the west.. i did the west first not cause i hate the east... but cause if i make a mistake its only 16 times to fix it, instead of 32 times.

Plus now that all the formulas will be correct.. all i have to do is plug in the east data and then change each formula to that teams row
Last edited May 10, 2008 15:52:08
 
Cerneo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
Just double checking every box. almost down with the west.. i did the west first not cause i hate the east... but cause they suck


FYP.

 
redwolfe11
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
I have the west totally done. i kinda hate the #'s cause they dont factor in backups. so just everyone starters. I will work on a formula to include backups..... the current numbers DONT reflect your tactics and your backup so keep that in mind and dont get upset cause some lower ranked teams in the west beat higher.


If its based off starters I think the Seminoles are not going to be anywhere near the top. I will be interested to see the rankings after you figure in back-ups.

I also think that basing it off player level is a little flawed. I do not think that player level is the best reflection of his impact in games. Depending on a players "Roll" when he created his player there is up to a 4 level difference in attribute points to his "promary" skills. So a level 1 player could be just as good skill points wise as a level 4 player. Or for our league, a level 12 player could equal the attribute points of a level 15 player. There is also the factor of one player buying all the special equipment and some not.

Player attributes would be a much more accurate ranking of a player. I realize the information for each player is most likely hidden from opposing teams (depending on each players setting). However, if you were able to get player attributes information it would be the most accurate power rankings out there for any league.

For ranking players based off attributes you could combine a few different ratings depending on which position that player is. FOr example:

A WR would use Agility, Speed, Jumping, Stamina, Vision, Catching

An OL would use Strength, Speed, Confidence, Blocking

etc, etc

The only problem is getting all the team owners to submit their player ratings to one person to make the rankings. It would probably never happen.

I think its great that you are taking the time to compile the list and I commend you for your efforts. I look forward to seeing how it comes out. Im fairly sure that the Seminoles wont come in the Top 5, and maybe not the Top 10.


 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by redwolfe11
Originally posted by Whatsdafus

I have the west totally done. i kinda hate the #'s cause they dont factor in backups. so just everyone starters. I will work on a formula to include backups..... the current numbers DONT reflect your tactics and your backup so keep that in mind and dont get upset cause some lower ranked teams in the west beat higher.


If its based off starters I think the Seminoles are not going to be anywhere near the top. I will be interested to see the rankings after you figure in back-ups.

I also think that basing it off player level is a little flawed. I do not think that player level is the best reflection of his impact in games. Depending on a players "Roll" when he created his player there is up to a 4 level difference in attribute points to his "promary" skills. So a level 1 player could be just as good skill points wise as a level 4 player. Or for our league, a level 12 player could equal the attribute points of a level 15 player. There is also the factor of one player buying all the special equipment and some not.

Player attributes would be a much more accurate ranking of a player. I realize the information for each player is most likely hidden from opposing teams (depending on each players setting). However, if you were able to get player attributes information it would be the most accurate power rankings out there for any league.

For ranking players based off attributes you could combine a few different ratings depending on which position that player is. FOr example:

A WR would use Agility, Speed, Jumping, Stamina, Vision, Catching

An OL would use Strength, Speed, Confidence, Blocking

etc, etc

The only problem is getting all the team owners to submit their player ratings to one person to make the rankings. It would probably never happen.

I think its great that you are taking the time to compile the list and I commend you for your efforts. I look forward to seeing how it comes out. Im fairly sure that the Seminoles wont come in the Top 5, and maybe not the Top 10.



I agreed before seeing the #'s and still do... but people and being bias doesnt help with power ranking

and i dont think everyone in the league is gonna show their players stats just so one guy can rank the teams... so count that out. lvl is a # you can kinda guess how good the player is.
Last edited May 10, 2008 16:17:38
 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
Something makes me think Cerneo is like 14... lol


 
Whatsdafus
offline
Link
 
OK. Guys remember, this should have been done from day 1. After each game you have to factor new levels, the team that won the game gets a bonus to their score and the team that loses gets points taken away. so these #'s are as if we havent played a game yet this year... Just remember that.

1- Sphere - 69.48
2- MB Bears - 66.21
3- Orangeblood - 64.97
4- The Real - 63.17
5- D. Horn - 62.49
6- K-Town - 62.49
7- Roughnecks - 62.03
8- Sharks - 61.46
9- Seminoles - 60.39
10- Mavericks - 59.76
11- D. Death - 56.76
11- Longhorns - 56.76
13- Zephyrs - 53.44
14- Stonecutter - 51.63
15- Outlaws - 49.98
16- Sonics - 49.03
Last edited May 10, 2008 16:13:48
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.