Warrior General Games

"Jackass"? Really? For simply pointing out, only after Porch continues to wallow about in some inter-conference bullshit, that his gloating about the awesomeness of his own conference (in which awesomeness his team plays no meaningful part) is. . .well. . .like Joe Lieberman getting all excited at the GOP convention? That seems unnecessary. Or, if you were going to try some name calling, you could have at least used creative profanity.

Look, you guys may be great next year, and, frankly, I hope you are, as a lot of the people on your team seem to spend a decent amount of time on GLB and it would be nice to see that effort rewarded with wins. As of now, though, not so much.

EDIT: Thanks, Emp, for the google confirmation.

Hey us zeta guys have to stick together against the torrent of bullshit that gets thrown our way.

Originally posted by Gyuri1
Well, no, they didn't, they went 8-8 and 4 of their top 5 teams lost. To the extent that you think they did, well, that's fine, it's not really worth arguing about something so meaningless. My point is that you are the 11th ranked team in your conference, which means even if the playoff teams in your conference are pretty good (which they are, and some of them are great), the "we" in your sentence doesn't really apply to you.

Hey, look, I understand why you would want to think that your team is terrible only b/c you're in a great conference, or that you would like to try and glory hunt with the teams in your conference that are actually good. The fact is that (a) you are in a good conference, and (b) your team kind of sucks. When you factor in that you actually have fairly high leveled players, the fact that you kind of suck pretty much points to, well, ownership. So not only does your team kind of suck, but as a team owner, you're pretty much the entire reason for it.

To sum up: Alpha = good. Triceratops = not good. Porch as owner of Triceratops = massive fail.

Now I have to go try and help prevent the Bulls from being embarrassed in our next playoff game. In case you are confused about what a playoff is, you can find a handy definition right here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/playoff


Well said.

They sure have a pretty big mouth over there, for a team that hasn't even had a sniff of a playoff game.

I have an idea for them though, if they would like to play in a playoff game.

Next season go 0-16, drop down to Southeast Asia A, and then maybe in season 6 they can make the #8 seed.

Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Gyuri1

Well, no, they didn't, they went 8-8 and 4 of their top 5 teams lost. To the extent that you think they did, well, that's fine, it's not really worth arguing about something so meaningless. My point is that you are the 11th ranked team in your conference, which means even if the playoff teams in your conference are pretty good (which they are, and some of them are great), the "we" in your sentence doesn't really apply to you.

Hey, look, I understand why you would want to think that your team is terrible only b/c you're in a great conference, or that you would like to try and glory hunt with the teams in your conference that are actually good. The fact is that (a) you are in a good conference, and (b) your team kind of sucks. When you factor in that you actually have fairly high leveled players, the fact that you kind of suck pretty much points to, well, ownership. So not only does your team kind of suck, but as a team owner, you're pretty much the entire reason for it.

To sum up: Alpha = good. Triceratops = not good. Porch as owner of Triceratops = massive fail.

Now I have to go try and help prevent the Bulls from being embarrassed in our next playoff game. In case you are confused about what a playoff is, you can find a handy definition right here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/playoff


This post is all sorts of win. To further back up what he said I did some Googling today:

http://www.gooogIe.co.uk/?gid=256483&hl=en&meta=o&q=Stucknut%20Triceratops%20make%20playoffs

Priceless

damn that was ownage Gyuri1....that club guy comes back with:

Originally posted by Club America
See you next year, jackass.

Or as the case may be;

See you next tuesday.

WEAKNESS in soooo many different ways. (does he thinks suckanut can beat the Bulls or soemthing? HAHA)

blah, site lag

Thanks for the Zeta unity. By the way, Sockamidic, feel free to express your appreciation by playing your defensive players on offense and vice versa. . .after a bit of scouting today, we are going to need the help. I have long thought that the Firestorm were the class of AA#4, but since the Red Bulls boosted, I'm not so sure (just to be clear, I think our team is very good, but the boosted Red Bulls team is fantastic).

Originally posted by Gyuri1
Well, no, they didn't, they went 8-8 and 4 of their top 5 teams lost. To the extent that you think they did, well, that's fine, it's not really worth arguing about something so meaningless. My point is that you are the 11th ranked team in your conference, which means even if the playoff teams in your conference are pretty good (which they are, and some of them are great), the "we" in your sentence doesn't really apply to you.

Hey, look, I understand why you would want to think that your team is terrible only b/c you're in a great conference, or that you would like to try and glory hunt with the teams in your conference that are actually good. The fact is that (a) you are in a good conference, and (b) your team kind of sucks. When you factor in that you actually have fairly high leveled players, the fact that you kind of suck pretty much points to, well, ownership. So not only does your team kind of suck, but as a team owner, you're pretty much the entire reason for it.

To sum up: Alpha = good. Triceratops = not good. Porch as owner of Triceratops = massive fail.

Now I have to go try and help prevent the Bulls from being embarrassed in our next playoff game. In case you are confused about what a playoff is, you can find a handy definition right here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/playoff


We couldn't go 8-8. Our playoff teams didn't play. Alpha went 6-2 in the non-playoff games.

Our biggest problem is our conference is very good. We would be a playoff team in Jr. easily. We did beat your #5 seed so based on that I would think we would have hosted a home field game yesterday.

Your #1 team managed just 1-2 vs Alpha. I pretty much figure you would have ended up 12-4 instead of 16-0 so tell me again how you figure your conference is anything but inferior.

Oh, you were talking about the meaningful preseason scrimmage games before (I thought you were referring to Snaza's creative math about week 16. . .sorry, I have a hard time keeping track of all of the bizarre justifications), and now you're talking about the meaningful postseason scrimmage games. Awesome. Keep your feet on the ground and keep reaching for the straws. . .

I cant believe youre using your game against the Razorbacks in the pre-season in your argument.

The fact is you havent made the playoffs in your own division and you wouldnt in zeta either. You know why? You spend so much time flaming up the forums that any game planning you do do isnt worth shit.

Ohh I know youll come back with some lame ass argument like "STFU NOOB YOUR TEAM WENT 8-8 AND MADE THE PLAYOFFS SO ZETA IS THE SUXOR! LOLZ! ROFLCOPTER!" so to counter it ahead of time - my team is exactly what happens when you have good game planning. The three teams in our division directly below us have higher average levels than we do yet we made the playoffs. This is what good game planning allows. Perhaps you should stop talking shit so much and concentrate on winning and what you say might mean something.

NOTE - I appologise to the three teams below the Bucks in the division. This wasnt a dig at you guys I was just illustrating a point about planning. All three of you pushed us hard and bar a miracle drive against the Fisherman theyd have went to the playoffs instead of us.

LOL at using scrimmage games to justify your league is better....and Gyuri1 was right, after looking your team does have high levels, in fact you outlevel many of the teams above you.....looks like suckanut only has one reason to lose the games they did, which is poor management, so sad...all that talent wasted....maybe you should worry more about your team rather then riding the nuts of teams that are making Alpha good.

You know if I was trying to argue Zeta's case I would probably try to change the subject also.

You know if I was trying to argue Jr's case I would probably try to change the subject also.

If you want a thread to discuss the failures of Stucknut then feel free to start one. I would be so interested in you all detailing what we have done wrong. However that garbage team is still 3-1 vs Jr. So what exactly does that say about Jr?