The teams with true power backs have an advantage over every other team right now. I have a friend that has a level 16 rb with 83 strength and he is running over defenses in their mid twenties.
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Originally posted by pt206
The teams with true power backs have an advantage over every other team right now. I have a friend that has a level 16 rb with 83 strength and he is running over defenses in their mid twenties.
Everyone can keep assuming our backs have 80 strength if they'd like to
The teams with true power backs have an advantage over every other team right now. I have a friend that has a level 16 rb with 83 strength and he is running over defenses in their mid twenties.
Everyone can keep assuming our backs have 80 strength if they'd like to
Bockaneer
offline
offline
Originally posted by
Not as lopsided of a game as the records will lead you to believe. Is this the game Jimmy Turner comes out of retirement? Can Austin stop the run?
Roughnecks win 31-14
if Jimmy was retired he came back like Jerry freaking Rice. And the run lives on. Nice call buddy.
Not as lopsided of a game as the records will lead you to believe. Is this the game Jimmy Turner comes out of retirement? Can Austin stop the run?
Roughnecks win 31-14
if Jimmy was retired he came back like Jerry freaking Rice. And the run lives on. Nice call buddy.
Last edited Aug 10, 2008 21:55:01
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Nice game for The Tick. Another very equitable distribution between you and Earl paid off. I almost feel bad for both of y'all that you haven't been able to chase the numbers that Iowa has. I have complete faith that if either of you were given the bulk of the carries you'd be right there with him in rushing numbers.
Especially after you played the gutted teams he has.
Especially after you played the gutted teams he has.
silverandblackattack
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Nice game for The Tick. Another very equitable distribution between you and Earl paid off. I almost feel bad for both of y'all that you haven't been able to chase the numbers that Iowa has. I have complete faith that if either of you were given the bulk of the carries you'd be right there with him in rushing numbers.
Especially after you played the gutted teams he has.
You do realize Grezbor Quam gets plenty of touches for the Sphere as well. That's why he is up high on the TD list with Iowa Jones duh. It ain't a one man show.
Nice game for The Tick. Another very equitable distribution between you and Earl paid off. I almost feel bad for both of y'all that you haven't been able to chase the numbers that Iowa has. I have complete faith that if either of you were given the bulk of the carries you'd be right there with him in rushing numbers.
Especially after you played the gutted teams he has.
You do realize Grezbor Quam gets plenty of touches for the Sphere as well. That's why he is up high on the TD list with Iowa Jones duh. It ain't a one man show.
lawdawg95
offline
offline
I did my research before I said anything. He gets some touches but it certainly isn't 50-50.
Game 1
Jones 33 Carries
Quam 14 Carries
Campbell 18 Carries
Tick 18 Carries
Game 2
Jones 22 Carries
Quam 8 Carries
Tick 22 Carries
Campbell 13 Carries
Game 3
Jones 35 Carries
Quam 13 Carries
Tick 17 Carries
Earl 20 Carries
Game 4
Jones 37 Carries (vs. Stonecutters. . . . padding?)
Quam 14 Carries (why not more vs. this sorry team?)
Campbell 21 Carries
Tick 21 Carries (Both over 100yds)
Game 5
Jones 30 Carries (Another sorry team and chance for balance)
Quam 18 Carries
Campbell 22 Carries
Tick 20 Carries
Total Carries for the season -
Jones 157 Carries Quam 67
Campbell 94 The Tick 98
If you want to think you run balanced that's fine, but don't let facts get in the way.
Game 1
Jones 33 Carries
Quam 14 Carries
Campbell 18 Carries
Tick 18 Carries
Game 2
Jones 22 Carries
Quam 8 Carries
Tick 22 Carries
Campbell 13 Carries
Game 3
Jones 35 Carries
Quam 13 Carries
Tick 17 Carries
Earl 20 Carries
Game 4
Jones 37 Carries (vs. Stonecutters. . . . padding?)
Quam 14 Carries (why not more vs. this sorry team?)
Campbell 21 Carries
Tick 21 Carries (Both over 100yds)
Game 5
Jones 30 Carries (Another sorry team and chance for balance)
Quam 18 Carries
Campbell 22 Carries
Tick 20 Carries
Total Carries for the season -
Jones 157 Carries Quam 67
Campbell 94 The Tick 98
If you want to think you run balanced that's fine, but don't let facts get in the way.
pt206
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Originally posted by pt206
The teams with true power backs have an advantage over every other team right now. I have a friend that has a level 16 rb with 83 strength and he is running over defenses in their mid twenties.
Everyone can keep assuming our backs have 80 strength if they'd like to
Where did I say they do?
60's is more than enough to run over most players.
Originally posted by pt206
The teams with true power backs have an advantage over every other team right now. I have a friend that has a level 16 rb with 83 strength and he is running over defenses in their mid twenties.
Everyone can keep assuming our backs have 80 strength if they'd like to
Where did I say they do?
60's is more than enough to run over most players.
Last edited Aug 10, 2008 22:40:59
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Odd thing is our backs don't have the build that everyone keeps talking about but yet they are still plowing over people like nobody's business.
pt206
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Odd thing is our backs don't have the build that everyone keeps talking about but yet they are still plowing over people like nobody's business.
This will change when the better teams play each other. You should still have success running, but it won't be the same.
Odd thing is our backs don't have the build that everyone keeps talking about but yet they are still plowing over people like nobody's business.
This will change when the better teams play each other. You should still have success running, but it won't be the same.
silverandblackattack
offline
offline
It isn't padding. Quam ran back a lot of punt returns versus the Stonecutters. Quam does all the punt and kickoff returns.
pt206
offline
offline
Originally posted by silverandblackattack
It isn't padding. Quam ran back a lot of punt returns versus the Stonecutters. Quam does all the punt and kickoff returns.
Hodges can back 5 and is about dead. He had to be carted off the field in a stretcher.
It isn't padding. Quam ran back a lot of punt returns versus the Stonecutters. Quam does all the punt and kickoff returns.
Hodges can back 5 and is about dead. He had to be carted off the field in a stretcher.
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rainey
No one can pretend to have the balance of Rainey Jr. and Smith.
94-98 is pretty gawdamn close.
No one can pretend to have the balance of Rainey Jr. and Smith.
94-98 is pretty gawdamn close.
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Originally posted by silverandblackattack
It isn't padding. Quam ran back a lot of punt returns versus the Stonecutters. Quam does all the punt and kickoff returns.
We leave the kick returns to our Lv 26 #3 HB who has a 10+yards/carry average for the season.
Next
It isn't padding. Quam ran back a lot of punt returns versus the Stonecutters. Quam does all the punt and kickoff returns.
We leave the kick returns to our Lv 26 #3 HB who has a 10+yards/carry average for the season.
Next
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
