Warrior General Games

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
BUT you play in Hydrogen.

Meaning your league games have came against teams currently ranked 13, 17, 18, 32, 43, 45, 47, 49, 54, and 59. That's a huge difference compared to Legacy's.

Exactly. We don't lose ELO because we're not expected to win and he doesn't gain ELO because he is. Its how the system works. Perhaps updating the k-value will fix things.

In ladder play INHS has beaten six teams they weren't "supposed" to beat. Maybe a couple others. Enough to begin a climb but not enough to reach the top.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
I've been complaining about how leagues aren't balanced since season 2. Now that these unbalanced leagues work in my favor, I'll take advantage. lol

The leagues are balanced, the league rankings are not balanced.

Originally posted by Parab00n
The leagues are balanced, the league rankings are not balanced.

Pretty much.

The real problem is that ranks change too slow at Vet with limited time the players/teams have at Vet.

You can't spend one whole season climbing the Ladder if you only get 3 (it's 3, right?) seasons at Vet.

If the game is going to have a small k value causing ELO to move slowly then players/teams need more seasons at Vet.

No matter what the k value is, if a Pro team hits Vet and goes undefeated, they should end the season with a Ladder rank of 1.

Undefeated is undefeated.

Previous seasons shouldn't matter at that point.

Originally posted by Xars
The real problem is that ranks change too slow at Vet with limited time the players/teams have at Vet.

You can't spend one whole season climbing the Ladder if you only get 3 (it's 3, right?) seasons at Vet.

If the game is going to have a small k value causing ELO to move slowly then players/teams need more seasons at Vet.

No matter what the k value is, if a Pro team hits Vet and goes undefeated, they should end the season with a Ladder rank of 1.

Undefeated is undefeated.

Previous seasons shouldn't matter at that point.


Excellent post.

Originally posted by Xars
You can't spend one whole season climbing the Ladder if you only get 3 (it's 3, right?) seasons at Vet.

2 Season at Vet, or 4 with all career boosts.

So if a team is in a league full of opponents they're "supposed" to lose to and lose to the majority and are way below .500 but stay in the top 10-15, its how it's supposed to work?

And this is ok?

"We may not actually be good but we still compete so we should stay in the ranks of the top teams" is so dumb I can't even

I agree with all that say K values need to be adjusted. Like Xars mentioned, if we only have 2-4 seasons at vet, it shouldn't take so long to climb the ranks when you are clearly a top team.

I didn't even realize AA is only 16. Bullshit

Originally posted by Duo
I didn't even realize AA is only 16. Bullshit

We are still in our same league which is littered with new vet teams. Teams like DD2, Portland and Jebs are all good enough to beat teams currently in the top 10, but give us less ELO than teams that are scrubby and have been around for a season or two.

stop complaining about your ladder ranking... if you're consistently good, you'll move up soon enough

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
stop complaining about your ladder ranking... if you're consistently good, you'll move up soon enough

You will only speak when spoken to.

Also, whoever keeps downvoting every single post can suck Tdiddy's dick.

I see your thumbs down and raise you 3 thumbs up, bitch.