Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Let me rephrase, with the word usage of man switching to zone if there's nobody to cover, does it also switch from man awareness to zone awareness?
If your player starts off the play in zone, he will always use zone awareness. Vice versa for man. If a player is in zone coverage and a WR runs into his zone, he will go cover the WR until the WR leaves his zone, at which time the zone defender will run back to the middle of his zone and wait for another defender to enter. Or if a 2nd defender is in his zone while he releases the original WR he was guarding due to the WR leaving the zone, he will run over to cover 2nd WR in his zone. I don't understand the confusion.
Let me rephrase, with the word usage of man switching to zone if there's nobody to cover, does it also switch from man awareness to zone awareness?
If your player starts off the play in zone, he will always use zone awareness. Vice versa for man. If a player is in zone coverage and a WR runs into his zone, he will go cover the WR until the WR leaves his zone, at which time the zone defender will run back to the middle of his zone and wait for another defender to enter. Or if a 2nd defender is in his zone while he releases the original WR he was guarding due to the WR leaving the zone, he will run over to cover 2nd WR in his zone. I don't understand the confusion.
Edited by Galactic Empire on Nov 19, 2014 10:37:21
Edited by Galactic Empire on Nov 19, 2014 10:37:02






























