Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Learning nothing on his way up... Hits a brickwall when plays wise opposition. Right back down.

Besides, that's what scrims and regular season and networks are for.

Originally posted by Adderfist
iirc, draw plays get an update in path logic as well.

Ah ya he did say something about draw play logic too.

Originally posted by peeti
How do you know? Is there still a tester Team?

I read threads just like you.

Originally posted by Badhands
[In real life] Halls of Fame are for the players with the highest all-time stats.

I disagree...stats have some effect on Hall of Fame inductees. More important, IMHO, is the impact players had on their generation of players, as well as being a leader and winning championships. See Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw, etc... Team leaders on championship teams should get a huge bonus to their HOF formula, or whatever is being used rank the players.


And what about shutdown corners? They don't have great stats because nobody throws their way? Also, for the love of God, please add to the HOF formula, percentage of receptions allowed per receiver targeted for defensive players.

Originally posted by Corndog
They won't have to "catch up", after season 1 players retire they won't be on the list because they won't be playing games.

WTH??? The entire purpose of the HOF is for players THAT RETIRE!!! Please rename it the All Pro board. It is not the HOF.

Originally posted by nortobc
I disagree...stats have some effect on Hall of Fame inductees. More important, IMHO, is the impact players had on their generation of players, as well as being a leader and winning championships. See Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw, etc... Team leaders on championship teams should get a huge bonus to their HOF formula, or whatever is being used rank the players.


And what about shutdown corners? They don't have great stats because nobody throws their way? Also, for the love of God, please add to the HOF formula, percentage of receptions allowed per receiver targeted for defensive players.

In the video game world stats are everything. If Troy Aikman and Terry Bradshaw are on the top of a GLB HoF that is fucking terrible.

Originally posted by Makntak
When you talk about removing WR tags, does this mean that the exploit (which I'm now using too) requiring only 2 plays on D will change?

To clarify a bit. Right now, I only have 2 defensive plays - All Dogs Go and Zero Edge Blitz. I had seen teams doing this and got creamed, then I read about it in a thread somewhere and started doing it. Not given up a point since. Why do we have 'x' number of defensive plays available and the clearly outrageous possibility of 15 per receiver set when we only actually need 2?

I'll stop being an asshole now and simply point out that I think this needs to change. 100%

Originally posted by Xavori
Dude, not to be overly snarky, but shutting out two bad teams doesn't a defensive genius make. And I can 100% guarantee you that your awesomesauce new defense will get shredded if you try it against a real team with a real offense.

Those two plays are good in the right circumstances or against the right opponent, but tell me, supergenious, how well do you really think you'd do against Zorp, Djibouti 2.0, Dryden, Glasgow, or the other hundred or so teams that have figured out how to beat pure pressure defenses?

Totally understand what people are saying here. Xavori, that's my point. I frickin hate it that this is all that some teams do, so I figured, if you can't beat'em...

But worse than that is the idea that this is even possible at all I'm not proud of myself, nor am I defensive supergenius ( far from it). I'm raising this because I want to see the Devs do something to make it counter-productive to run a D in this way, cuz it's a joke. So, I wondered if removing the WR tags would be that solution.

Originally posted by Makntak
But worse than that is the idea that this is even possible at all I'm not proud of myself, nor am I defensive supergenius ( far from it). I'm raising this because I want to see the Devs do something to make it counter-productive to run a D in this way, cuz it's a joke. So, I wondered if removing the WR tags would be that solution.

There's always going to be something thats the best against people not paying attention.

Take all of the DotA, LoL, and other MOBAs for example. There's always a "pub stomp" hero that just destroys in games with uncoordinated and inexperienced players, but when it's actually even competition, those heroes become mediocre at best, and some just flat out awful.

Not saying that changes aren't being made to it, but it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do against teams just haphazardly passing the ball. Emphasizing it's weak points isn't going to help against teams that don't really try to accommodate it.

Originally posted by Corndog
There's always going to be something thats the best against people not paying attention.

Take all of the DotA, LoL, and other MOBAs for example. There's always a "pub stomp" hero that just destroys in games with uncoordinated and inexperienced players, but when it's actually even competition, those heroes become mediocre at best, and some just flat out awful.

Not saying that changes aren't being made to it, but it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do against teams just haphazardly passing the ball. Emphasizing it's weak points isn't going to help against teams that don't really try to accommodate it.

Better tell us whats wrong with the Games atm???

Originally posted by Corndog
There's always going to be something thats the best against people not paying attention.

Take all of the DotA, LoL, and other MOBAs for example. There's always a "pub stomp" hero that just destroys in games with uncoordinated and inexperienced players, but when it's actually even competition, those heroes become mediocre at best, and some just flat out awful.

Not saying that changes aren't being made to it, but it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do against teams just haphazardly passing the ball. Emphasizing it's weak points isn't going to help against teams that don't really try to accommodate it.

btw, xin zhao was always a good example of that until they remade him. RIP OP Xin

Originally posted by Makntak
When you talk about removing WR tags, does this mean that the exploit (which I'm now using too) requiring only 2 plays on D will change?

To clarify a bit. Right now, I only have 2 defensive plays - All Dogs Go and Zero Edge Blitz. I had seen teams doing this and got creamed, then I read about it in a thread somewhere and started doing it. Not given up a point since. Why do we have 'x' number of defensive plays available and the clearly outrageous possibility of 15 per receiver set when we only actually need 2?

I'll stop being an asshole now and simply point out that I think this needs to change. 100%

Did I just learn this secret only for it to not be useful?

GLB1 all over again.

Grrr.

Originally posted by peeti
Better tell us whats wrong with the Games atm???

Your guess is as good as mine.

Originally posted by Makntak
When you talk about removing WR tags, does this mean that the exploit (which I'm now using too) requiring only 2 plays on D will change?

To clarify a bit. Right now, I only have 2 defensive plays - All Dogs Go and Zero Edge Blitz. I had seen teams doing this and got creamed, then I read about it in a thread somewhere and started doing it. Not given up a point since. Why do we have 'x' number of defensive plays available and the clearly outrageous possibility of 15 per receiver set when we only actually need 2?

I'll stop being an asshole now and simply point out that I think this needs to change. 100%

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/32660

sup?

lol

Not sure if Romo is bragging about winning a Sophmore vs Rookie game ironically or not