User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > CPUs bring the noise
Page:
 
JT_HOOD
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
you lost to Godstoria. That automatically disqualifies you from relevancy.


http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2201293

RNG is the name of the game this season apparently
 
reddogrw
HOOD
online
Link
 
Originally posted by JT_HOOD
Originally posted by bhall43

you lost to Godstoria. That automatically disqualifies you from relevancy.


http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2201293

RNG is the name of the game this season apparently


 
Dr. E
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by English Pats Fan
CPU's seem way too good this season, I've seen this happen quite a few times against far superior Human teams


No you haven't. Good teams don't get beat by CPU teams.
 
HOODjelly
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw


Yeah, I know.

RNG is more R then evar! this season
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Yo Dadd, don't edit my posts. It isn't against the forum rules to be mean, which you would know if you had the slightest clue about how to be a moderator.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Novus
The reason I'm posting in this thread is because people believe that "CPU team beats ANY human team" = "CPU dots must be overpowered." My argument is that CPU teams can beat TERRIBAD human teams, but nobody has ever shown me an example of a CPU team beating a DECENT human team.

The team in question was undefeated and has an effective level of 62 compared to their average level of 56. That's at minimum a "decent human team," so you have been shown one and you need to shut up. It annoys me that you continue to babble even after it's been exposed that you have absolutely no legitimate point.
 
yendorii
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Yo Dadd, don't edit my posts. It isn't against the forum rules to be mean, which you would know if you had the slightest clue about how to be a moderator.


Do you have any idea at all the number of sites on the internet where a moderator would ban you for a comment like that? Your little whiny bitch "I DIDN'T GET MY WAY!!" bs isn't really tolerated well most places. You should be more grateful that they take their cue from DD who also wouldn't remain a member of many forums for long.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yendorii
Do you have any idea at all the number of sites on the internet where a moderator would ban you for a comment like that?

I don't know what your My Little Pony fansites are like, but I've been around the internet for a while now and I didn't suddenly become an asshole when I logged on to GLB. Just because you constantly bitch and whine about my posts doesn't actually change reality to suit your whim, so no, most sites do not ban for being critical of moderation, especially when those moderators don't have a clue about the listed rules.
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

I don't know what your My Little Pony fansites are like, but I've been around the internet for a while now and I didn't suddenly become an asshole when I logged on to GLB. Just because you constantly bitch and whine about my posts doesn't actually change reality to suit your whim, so no, most sites do not ban for being critical of moderation, especially when those moderators don't have a clue about the listed rules.


Lol.

Originally posted by jdbolick

The team in question was undefeated and has an effective level of 62 compared to their average level of 56. That's at minimum a "decent human team," so you have been shown one and you need to shut up. It annoys me that you continue to babble even after it's been exposed that you have absolutely no legitimate point.


Except they lost to a CPU team...

As I said before, at this level Dpride still hadn't assigned VP or EQ. His effective level was higher, but if he had zero cares he might have lost to a CPU.

The fact that this team lost to CPU doesn't mean CPU is better than you think, it means this team is worse.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Time Trial
Except they lost to a CPU team...

As I said before, at this level Dpride still hadn't assigned VP or EQ. His effective level was higher, but if he had zero cares he might have lost to a CPU.

The fact that this team lost to CPU doesn't mean CPU is better than you think, it means this team is worse.


 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick


They won five games in competitive: stop pretending that these are good builds for this sim or that tactics don't matter.

Or go watch the game?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Time Trial
They won five games in competitive: stop pretending that these are good builds for this sim or that tactics don't matter. Or go watch the game?

Dude, I know that you think you're relevant because you took your crap team to the WL for one season but I assure you that you're not. Don't post as if we're equals since we clearly aren't. Those are good builds, without question. Not great, but good. I'm also sure that it's a completely zero cares team where any AI changes are made for fun rather than a sincere attempt to win. But you look utterly ridiculous by trying to insist that a previously undefeated team losing to a previously 1-7 CPU team is in any way plausible. When HCreek or mwoods win with CPU rosters because they have proven AIs installed, that's one thing. This is something else entirely.
Edited by jdbolick on Oct 31, 2012 20:42:35
 
e1iterate
favorite prism
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by juggernaut56


 
JT_HOOD
HOOD
offline
Link
 
for the record there has never been an ai in place. i put one on in season 28 it says but I've never tagged so it doesn't fire. i have never watched a snap tbh
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

Dude, I know that you think you're relevant because you took your crap team to the WL for one season but I assure you that you're not. Don't post as if we're equals since we clearly aren't. Those are good builds, without question. Not great, but good. I'm also sure that it's a completely zero cares team where any AI changes are made for fun rather than a sincere attempt to win. But you look utterly ridiculous by trying to insist that a previously undefeated team losing to a previously 1-7 CPU team is in any way plausible. When HCreek or mwoods win with CPU rosters because they have proven AIs installed, that's one thing. This is something else entirely.


Are you kidding me? Pull your head out of your ass. Whatever pull you think you have in this game, whatever you think you know about this game, you are defending a foolish argument. CPU is still shit, you can't argue it, you haven't brought it any evidence. You say: I say the way things are because "I'm a BFD".

Come back with something better. You say because I've taken a team from peewee Gold to WL I don't have a say in these forums? Come back when you aren't trying to tell GLB that losing to the CPU isn't so bad.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.