Warrior General Games

i think u need a non boosting league and a boosting league

Originally posted by mannydog
i think u need a non boosting league and a boosting league

this IS a boosting league, some choose not to boost...................hmmmm.

Originally posted by dreven
this IS a boosting league, some choose not to boost...................hmmmm.

yea,i get that .i just dont think they do

Originally posted by dreven
this IS a boosting league, some choose not to boost...................hmmmm.

I don't see anywhere stating this is a boosting league. You may want it to be, but it's obvious you don't need to boost to win.

Originally posted by Seric
I don't see anywhere stating this is a boosting league. You may want it to be, but it's obvious you don't need to boost to win.

yes.............this is what we know..

so, it has to state that this is a 'BOOSTING' league?? i forgot to read my manual.

You have any idea how amazing this league would be if you didn't boost? 32 teams at an even playing field? Plus it's essentially a no-risk cost, so you'd get a ton more people forming teams.

Boosting is Pay2Win in its purest form. Oh, I get it, you wouldn't have won your shitty silver league without boosting in order to beat those pesky CPUs, right?

Originally posted by dreven
yes.............this is what we know..

so, it has to state that this is a 'BOOSTING' league?? i forgot to read my manual.

You stated that this is a boosting league as if it is written all over the place. The only league in GLB that can truly be called a boosting league is the World League. If you're getting beat by non-boosters when you're a booster, then perhaps you should check your builds and tactics because what do you think would have happened if these non-boosters actually boosted? You would have been destroyed. They beat you with superior builds and superior tactics with less SP than you had available. So just imagine what they're builds would look like if they boosted.

Originally posted by awsalick
You have any idea how amazing this league would be if you didn't boost? 32 teams at an even playing field? Plus it's essentially a no-risk cost, so you'd get a ton more people forming teams.

Boosting is Pay2Win in its purest form. Oh, I get it, you wouldn't have won your shitty silver league without boosting in order to beat those pesky CPUs, right?

I understand your frustrations, but this league would be even more dominated by the elite teams if boosting were not allowed. The non-boosted teams that can hang with boosted teams right now would be even more dominant. The fact of the matter is that for the 20 or so teams that do not fall into the elite category (for instance, the majority of the new Gold teams each season) would still be struggling to get a win, while the top teams would distance themselves even more. The only real chance they have is that they can boost and try to hang with the elite non-boosters.

Originally posted by 89stepside
I understand your frustrations, but this league would be even more dominated by the elite teams if boosting were not allowed. The non-boosted teams that can hang with boosted teams right now would be even more dominant. The fact of the matter is that for the 20 or so teams that do not fall into the elite category (for instance, the majority of the new Gold teams each season) would still be struggling to get a win, while the top teams would distance themselves even more. The only real chance they have is that they can boost and try to hang with the elite non-boosters.

I'd argue there are non-boosted teams in silver of comparable quality to the non-elite boosters. They just end up losing in the silver playoffs to the boosted teams and end up not getting promoted.

For example, from yesterday's games:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2207585

GG Buffalo !

GG Gerr! I just couldn't get anything going on offense. Your defense is like a rubik's cube to me.

GG Crib & Taz!

I am in a state of shock.
GG - Kill Devil Hill Flyers

GG Minnesota Vikes

inb4 both of Gerr's team make champ.