User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Seahawk's Week 3 Playoff Preview and Picks...
Page:
 
ANumber1Roy
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Redrover
Originally posted by mwoods07

So wait...sort of confused. According to you, we have nothing on you but that you didn't cover the FB well...seems ODD to me. Seemed like a lot more going on out there than 1 FB not covered. Be interested to hear HOW we won then if you guys have everything better.


Naw even if your FB dropped every pass you'd still have won. Our secondary couldn't cover anything and Bud Golden went elusive-crazy. Everything just went bad- I don't think anyone had a good game for us. Hell that WR2 broke a tackle on our SS who is loaded with every tackle-making VA and double mt%.

It's not a huge secret our secondary was a weak link (hence why I needed to take a gamble with the FB coverage in the first place)... but they are loaded with useless intercept% AEQ (and we didn't even finish first in INTs). The AEQ exchange is going to help us out a lot and we'll be back and better next season and try to give you a closer game hopefully.

For now the LOLlion sleeps tonight


Cash has 2 Interecept % pieces that clearly did nothing most of the season. That'll be changed in the offseason of course.

 
ANumber1Roy
offline
Link
 
I'll take the heat with that bad experiment. He holds his own mostly but he isn't all world like the Minister.
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Redrover
we'll be back and better next season and try to give you a closer game hopefully.



you got an average team that peaked on 100% chem and the fact you had the youngest level 72 team.. Youngest level 72 team means you had overall the longest time getting the boost from archetype algs.. You're going to get annihilated next season. Save yourself some time and just gut.
Edited by Dana White on Aug 15, 2011 07:35:51
 
Redrover
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dana White
you got an average team that peaked on 100% chem and the fact you had the youngest level 72 team.. Youngest level 72 team means you had overall the longest time getting the boost from archetype algs.. You're going to get annihilated next season. Save yourself some time and just gut.


lol
 
GMathiasf
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dana White
you got an average team that peaked on 100% chem and the fact you had the youngest level 72 team.. Youngest level 72 team means you had overall the longest time getting the boost from archetype algs.. You're going to get annihilated next season. Save yourself some time and just gut.


So would you call them the Paris of s24?
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dana White
you got an average team that peaked on 100% chem and the fact you had the youngest level 72 team.. Youngest level 72 team means you had overall the longest time getting the boost from archetype algs.. You're going to get annihilated next season. Save yourself some time and just gut.


huh, all teams had the same amount of chem in the playoffs, they would have been evenly matched in rounds 1 and 2......where the won, as opposed to losing

what am I missing here
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by .spider.
what am I missing here


inb4

Dana: Rings
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by .spider.
huh, all teams had the same amount of chem in the playoffs, they would have been evenly matched in rounds 1 and 2......where the won, as opposed to losing

what am I missing here


they got a great start no doubt which helped them sandbag the last part of their season and when they played qcbc - qcbc had no chance - they were able to exploit qcbc for all they had as nobody had ever seen them use that horrible te before and they did it well. I just know their dots other than their dline are pretty average and there is no chance they are better next season
 
bug03
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dana White
they got a great start no doubt which helped them sandbag the last part of their season and when they played qcbc - qcbc had no chance - they were able to exploit qcbc for all they had as nobody had ever seen them use that horrible te before and they did it well. I just know their dots other than their dline are pretty average and there is no chance they are better next season


every team will be better next season.... eq swaps and new custom and 70 sp's

edit: the teams with the shittier builds will improve more than the teams with better builds currently.
Edited by bug03 on Aug 15, 2011 08:53:08
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bug03
every team will be better next season.... eq swaps and new custom and 70 sp's

the teams with the shittier builds will improve more than the teams with better builds currently.


 
superpunk
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bug03
every team will be better next season.... eq swaps and new custom and 70 sp's

edit: the teams with the shittier builds will improve more than the teams with better builds currently.


you been beatin that drum for a while now.

you're wrong.
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Here is one of my cb's that I will open for the sake of argument. I would argue that no cb is going to improve as much as this dude and he is pretty much an awesome build.

The best built dots will improve the most - the most effective dots will get passed up IMO
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1823762
 
superpunk
offline
Link
 
Yeah the best built dots are going to have 10s across their SAs while shitty built dots are gonna be spending SPs to increase attributes.
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
it's pointless to argue, all dots gettnig the same amount of SP's per their peers

so if it was a better build before, it's going to be a better build in the end
if it sucks before, it will suck after when compared to the not suck dots
 
mwoods07
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bug03
every team will be better next season.... eq swaps and new custom and 70 sp's

edit: the teams with the shittier builds will improve more than the teams with better builds currently.


Every team will get better..the bad dots will improve some...the average dots will probably be good...and the really good dots will just be stupid. IMHO, nothing will change too much. Biggest change will be how well teams recruit.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.