User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Casual Leagues > Casual Prep Leagues > Season 21 Prep Casual Elite
Page:
 
Chaosunfolds
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Crushr
GG Columbus. Our defense wasn't too shabby but your defense was outstanding. GL rest of the season.


Thanks Crushr. It was a great defensive game. GG and GL.
 
Kirghiz
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BADGERBACKER


Just now looked at the changelog, and than the tactics page. How skeered are ya? Did you know that you can blitz one with a 3 man front and spy 6 players on the defense with the CB's in zone? Whose idea was that?
Edited by Kirghiz on Mar 28, 2011 19:24:05
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 
This will be my last season with the Badgers. Also, just because I'm pissed off I'll be retiring all my 55 dots on my Copperhead team so kudos GLB - you just lost income from 110 dots and I'll likely do more as a big old fuck you.
 
makaw
offline
Link
 
Oh darn, don't build a gimmick team then.
 
makaw
offline
Link
 
did you not foresee this? I mean just look at your QB, he's averaging 37 ypc. Of course they were going to do something.
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by makaw
did you not foresee this? I mean just look at your QB, he's averaging 37 ypc. Of course they were going to do something.

Change, yes. Not six spies worth of change - that's ridiculous. To do it now when I cannot change up my roster - great!

Originally posted by makaw
Oh darn, don't build a gimmick team then.

I only see a few teams beating my current team even with the rule change. RCR not being one of them.
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 
.
Edited by BADGERBACKER on Mar 29, 2011 12:10:09
 
Crushr
offline
Link
 
The bitterness of another nerf session! Funny how you didn't care when others were pissed off that an exploit was beating them but now you want to vent when that exploit is reigned in. Not hatin' but I ain't givin' sympathy either.
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 


Sorry, I am a little irked - uncalled for on my behalf.
Edited by BADGERBACKER on Mar 29, 2011 12:10:21
 
dustinjtrr
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BADGERBACKER

Change, yes. Not six spies worth of change - that's ridiculous. To do it now when I cannot change up my roster - great!


I agree with you there, they knew this problem existed last season and should have done something about it then.

But IMO, GLB would have lost more players that your 110 dots if they let that trend continue so it's for the good of the game.
 
JayKwaz
offline
Link
 
I don't have any running QB's myself in casual and I think the new rule is unfair. I have been able to gameplan and beat running QB teams. Just need a few stops and outscore them. 6 spies are crazy. I would not suggest more then 2.
Edited by JayKwaz on Mar 29, 2011 14:35:01
 
J Maguire
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JayKwaz
I don't have any running QB's myself in casual and I think the new rule is unfair. I have been able to gameplan and beat running QB teams. Just need a few stops and outscore them. 6 spies are crazy. I would not suggest more then 2.


The flipside to that is if a team wants to use all 6 spies, they better hope the team they are playing does nothing but run their QB. The more guys you use to spy, the more you are vulnerable somewhere else on the field.
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by J Maguire
The flipside to that is if a team wants to use all 6 spies, they better hope the team they are playing does nothing but run their QB. The more guys you use to spy, the more you are vulnerable somewhere else on the field.


Kind of curious how it looks - haven't checked any games today but I know the dots can look pretty silly waiting for the QB to run as the RB races down the sideline.
 
Kirghiz
offline
Link
 
@ the whiners: fix ur builds.
 
BADGERBACKER
offline
Link
 
Way to late to fix anything. How am I supposed to fix this???????

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2255824

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2255985

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.