Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick


embarrassing huh

Originally posted by jdbolick

No one has said that calling the WR screen and the FB weak screen 34 times was acceptable. You're making excuses precisely because you know that Lincoln had a coward's gameplan today.

34 is fine. 35 is the acceptable limit, afaik.

Originally posted by tautology
Originally posted by jdbolick


No one has said that calling the WR screen and the FB weak screen 34 times was acceptable. You're making excuses precisely because you know that Lincoln had a coward's gameplan today.

34 is fine. 35 is the acceptable limit, afaik.




I love the repeat play penalty...

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt
jd,

How can you bitch at Lincoln when your defense has lived off of exploiting the ROLB last season? Hell you were known for one of the most exploitative defenses around when it came to how you used this dot.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_game_log.pl?player_id=1275877

Last season it was cool because it worked for Providence in big games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1508011&pbp_id=13966413

This season it didn't work as frequently against the best teams... And now you are on the flip side of the coin when it comes to a known sim exploit and you're pissed?

How is it Ok for you to use an exploit, but for another team to not?
If you were a better DC then you would understand why this post makes you look so ignorant. Sending 6 blitzers against 5 blockers isn't an exploit. It wasn't true when people accused jdros and it's not true when you're accusing me. Moreover, my blitzes were stopped every single time by just keeping the TE in to block. There's nothing I can do as a DC that the offense can't counter. Meanwhile everyone already knows that the WR screen is broken due to the catch location, along with the way Bort coded defenders to hang back and wait for blockers to get into position. I had 2-3 guys dedicated to just the WR screen on most of those Singleback plays and it didn't matter because that play is broken. Everyone knows it. For that matter, everyone uses it, they just don't use it 24 times in one game because most would be too embarrassed to do that.

Furthermore, I don't get why people like you keep ignoring that bhall already apologized to me for this gameplan. He knows it was bush-league and he admitted it. I appreciate him doing that, because as I told him, I would never expect that from him since I believe he's one of the best OCs in the game and doesn't need such cowardly tactics.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt

jd,

How can you bitch at Lincoln when your defense has lived off of exploiting the ROLB last season? Hell you were known for one of the most exploitative defenses around when it came to how you used this dot.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_game_log.pl?player_id=1275877

Last season it was cool because it worked for Providence in big games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1508011&pbp_id=13966413

This season it didn't work as frequently against the best teams... And now you are on the flip side of the coin when it comes to a known sim exploit and you're pissed?

How is it Ok for you to use an exploit, but for another team to not?
If you were a better DC then you would understand why this post makes you look so ignorant. Sending 6 blitzers against 5 blockers isn't an exploit. It wasn't true when people accused jdros and it's not true when you're accusing me. Moreover, my blitzes were stopped every single time by just keeping the TE in to block. There's nothing I can do as a DC that the offense can't counter. Meanwhile everyone already knows that the WR screen is broken due to the catch location, along with the way Bort coded defenders to hang back and wait for blockers to get into position. I had 2-3 guys dedicated to just the WR screen on most of those Singleback plays and it didn't matter because that play is broken. Everyone knows it. For that matter, everyone uses it, they just don't use it 24 times in one game because most would be too embarrassed to do that.

Furthermore, I don't get why people like you keep ignoring that bhall already apologized to me for this gameplan. He knows it was bush-league and he admitted it. I appreciate him doing that, because as I told him, I would never expect that from him since I believe he's one of the best OCs in the game and doesn't need such cowardly tactics.

Perfect response. I didn't expect anything less.

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt
Originally posted by jdbolick

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt


jd,

How can you bitch at Lincoln when your defense has lived off of exploiting the ROLB last season? Hell you were known for one of the most exploitative defenses around when it came to how you used this dot.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_game_log.pl?player_id=1275877

Last season it was cool because it worked for Providence in big games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1508011&pbp_id=13966413

This season it didn't work as frequently against the best teams... And now you are on the flip side of the coin when it comes to a known sim exploit and you're pissed?

How is it Ok for you to use an exploit, but for another team to not?
If you were a better DC then you would understand why this post makes you look so ignorant. Sending 6 blitzers against 5 blockers isn't an exploit. It wasn't true when people accused jdros and it's not true when you're accusing me. Moreover, my blitzes were stopped every single time by just keeping the TE in to block. There's nothing I can do as a DC that the offense can't counter. Meanwhile everyone already knows that the WR screen is broken due to the catch location, along with the way Bort coded defenders to hang back and wait for blockers to get into position. I had 2-3 guys dedicated to just the WR screen on most of those Singleback plays and it didn't matter because that play is broken. Everyone knows it. For that matter, everyone uses it, they just don't use it 24 times in one game because most would be too embarrassed to do that.

Furthermore, I don't get why people like you keep ignoring that bhall already apologized to me for this gameplan. He knows it was bush-league and he admitted it. I appreciate him doing that, because as I told him, I would never expect that from him since I believe he's one of the best OCs in the game and doesn't need such cowardly tactics.

Perfect response. I didn't expect anything less.

it is a perfect response.
bolick you do realize that they kept the TE in to block left andit was 6 on 6, right?

Originally posted by jdbolick

If you were a better DC then you would understand why this post makes you look so ignorant. Sending 6 blitzers against 5 blockers isn't an exploit. It wasn't true when people accused jdros and it's not true when you're accusing me. Moreover, my blitzes were stopped every single time by just keeping the TE in to block.

oh the irony

Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
it is a perfect response.
bolick you do realize that they kept the TE in to block left andit was 6 on 6, right?

shhhhhhhhh he wasn't supposed to know that

90% of the time, then. My bad.

jd, just log off dude. Save yourself from further humiliation...

So wow, Cianci had 2 sacks in that game. That's really comparable to a team calling the WR screen 24 times.

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt
jd, just log off dude. Save yourself from further humiliation...
What humiliation? Bhall himself apologized to me for Lincoln running such a cowardly gameplan, so clearly I'm right. Even the OC responsible for it thought so.

Originally posted by jdbolick
So wow, Cianci had 2 sacks in that game. That's really comparable to a team calling the WR screen 24 times.

You're ROLB last season destroyed teams with such exploits. Enough said...