Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Snayr
Originally posted by jaxinthebox

I think you need moar level 70s in AA tbh. without them, we outplayed you.



Here come the excuses now that they've lost by a landslide. Figures tbh.

I'm pretty happy with our play in that game. We played you closer than any other team has. Like I said, without the 70s, we won.

Yeah but who's fault is it that you don't have level 70's? Not ours.

i demand a wrath appreciation thread. someone tell thundercats to get on it. he can be the first to appreciate.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
YMIV is only level 54. Also, this is AA--level 70s are perfectly acceptable if they want to play here. Next time do a better job of recruiting and get the level 70s on your team.

I'd rather not dump great agents to have a revolving door of players that are replaced every season just to do better in one season. Those players won't be able to play peewee before too long and then where will your advantage be? It was only 37-13 right after the 3rd. Looks like those extra seasons of stamina/confidence training came through for you GG

lol at level 70's playing AA ball. If it makes their e penis' hard good for them. Myself I'd be embarrassed if I had a level 70 dot that couldn't land a gig higher than AA.

How many 70's do we have? 4-5 I think.

They are just guys that I did not feel like retiring even though they were already in heavy decline.

Just checked it out.

2 RBs
1 FB
1 NT
and 2 special teams only players.

How come you only scored 13 pts? Def wasn't the level 70's?

Originally posted by kswass
Just checked it out.

2 RBs
1 FB
1 NT
and 2 special teams only players.

How come you only scored 13 pts? Def wasn't the level 70's?





no excuses for that currently.

Originally posted by 4favre
lol at level 70's playing AA ball. If it makes their e penis' hard good for them. Myself I'd be embarrassed if I had a level 70 dot that couldn't land a gig higher than AA.

lol. Our level 70s are 463, 497, 492, 497, 452, and 493 days old. They should definitely still be playing in WL. That whole decline thing definitely doesn't matter to top teams. Of course, seeing as how you aren't associated with any top teams, I can see how you could be confused.

Originally posted by jaxinthebox
Originally posted by jaxinthebox



HB Big Bort 18 carries 58.5yds 3.3Average/carry 3td <---lvl 55 Comparison study
HB Lionel James 9 carries 120yds 13.3average/carry 1td <---lvl 72
HB B i g G a i n 8 carries 97.5yds 12.2 average/carry 1 td <---lvl 72

Eliminate those player's impact on the game and morale reduction to our players, and it would have been a different outcome.



you think big bort might be a different type of back? seeing as how you can simply look a players profile and tell their archetype - it's obvious that big bort is a power runner. so you stopped the power game up the middle. give yourself some credit. you held big bort to 3.3 ypc.

i don't think it would have mattered if we had level 55 HBs who were designed for the outside or level 72. you stopped one and the other one got you. their level doesn't matter that much.

now special c. 6 fumbles. wow. that's awesome.

Originally posted by jaxinthebox
Originally posted by jaxinthebox

Originally posted by kswass


How many 70's do we have? 4-5 I think.

They are just guys that I did not feel like retiring even though they were already in heavy decline.

HB Big Bort 18 carries 58.5yds 3.3Average/carry 3td <---lvl 55 Comparison study
HB Lionel James 9 carries 120yds 13.3average/carry 1td <---lvl 72
HB B i g G a i n 8 carries 97.5yds 12.2 average/carry 1 td <---lvl 72

SS Special C 13 tackles 6 forced fumbles <----lvl 71

Eliminate those player's impact on the game and morale reduction to our players, and it would have been a different outcome.



You forgot:

CB YMIV 36 plays 4 tackles 1 TFL 2 INTs 77 Yards 2 TDs <---lvl 54 (one level less than WMDs average level)

Lots of quote fails going on in here.