Originally posted by Azure Dreams
They disagree with what? We need more than that than ust saying "they dont think you follow the rules"
You need something more substantive.
there are two sides to that coin, of course... i'm not sure the burden of proof is on me, especially since i'm just reporting the claims of others
Originally posted by Azure Dreams
What about the 20 locked threads from last night that empirically do nothing mentioned on the "against the rules" list?
i didn't see all the threads, but i did note the NMV was noting why he was locking threads.
and note that whether or not he was correct with those locks is a separate discussion -- the point is that he thought he was doing his job.
They disagree with what? We need more than that than ust saying "they dont think you follow the rules"
You need something more substantive.
there are two sides to that coin, of course... i'm not sure the burden of proof is on me, especially since i'm just reporting the claims of others
Originally posted by Azure Dreams
What about the 20 locked threads from last night that empirically do nothing mentioned on the "against the rules" list?
i didn't see all the threads, but i did note the NMV was noting why he was locking threads.
and note that whether or not he was correct with those locks is a separate discussion -- the point is that he thought he was doing his job.






























