Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Reggie Smash

Exactly. The major problem most of us have is: if you're going to run a 100% exploit-based offense, don't front like you have some kind of superior gameplanning skills once it's all said & done.


To be honest, we only run a 99% exploit-based offense. Our defense is only 85% exploit-based, but I am hoping Doc_Nilla can improve that during the off-season.

Originally posted by dlee1019
I know I've been MIA, but the Rhinos are going down!!!! Closing it out with a CHAMPIONSHIP BABY!!!!!!

GL Rhinos......you'll need it!

Were you beating your chest when you type this? ^^^^
I know your looking for a win after our first match up... hopefully we'll be ready for whatever you throw at us.

Well Said Tiger we only did what almost every other team has been doing including the Bugeaters!!

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307
Originally posted by majech

Spider Monkeez exploited us. It wouldn't have surprised me, if it weren't for how "opposed" to it they were.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

Remember that? Outlawz called TUC everything but a red-headed step-child for doing the Strong I exploit in a REGULAR SEASON GAME. Looks like Outlawz showed his true colors today. Pretty disappointed to see him do that actually.

Someone said that winning that way would feel better than losing that way. I disagree. Now that I speak from experience, I'd much rather have lost a game like that, than won a game like that.


You ran the ball 47 times. 8 of those 47 runs were out of the I formation. Take a guess what the other 39 were out of?? You guys used the same exploit.

The reason you lost is because you had to settle for FGs instead of TDs when you got in scoring position. Also because your kick coverage was terrible and you got unlucky with one turnover.

I can understand your frustration but the Strong I is not the only reason you lost.

Originally posted by Reggie Smash
Exactly. The major problem most of us have is: if you're going to run a 100% exploit-based offense, don't front like you have some kind of superior gameplanning skills once it's all said & done.


I don't think anyone from Ghana ever said that, but we spent more time planning for this than for most of our games this season. That's sad, really, considering that setting up the offensive AI took almost no time. Defensive AI took a lot longer.

Somehow I get the impression that you think running 100% Strong I Slam = 100% win. Against teams that can't defend it, yes, but that's not all teams. Unfortunately, we don't defend it well either so our playoff run will be short-lived.

Tigerbait for the win.

Originally posted by Doc_Nilla
Originally posted by Reggie Smash

Exactly. The major problem most of us have is: if you're going to run a 100% exploit-based offense, don't front like you have some kind of superior gameplanning skills once it's all said & done.


I don't think anyone from Ghana ever said that, but we spent more time planning for this than for most of our games this season. That's sad, really, considering that setting up the offensive AI took almost no time. Defensive AI took a lot longer.

Somehow I get the impression that you think running 100% Strong I Slam = 100% win. Against teams that can't defend it, yes, but that's not all teams. Unfortunately, we don't defend it well either so our playoff run will be short-lived.

I think had you just said the truth, that it was your only shot, so you did it....Blame Bort. We all would have said yep, your right.

Originally posted by Lensar
Originally posted by Reggie Smash


Exactly. The major problem most of us have is: if you're going to run a 100% exploit-based offense, don't front like you have some kind of superior gameplanning skills once it's all said & done.


To be honest, we only run a 99% exploit-based offense. Our defense is only 85% exploit-based, but I am hoping Doc_Nilla can improve that during the off-season.

This is the exactly right response. The loss still hurts like shit, but this I can deal with. Thanks.

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307
Originally posted by majech

Spider Monkeez exploited us. It wouldn't have surprised me, if it weren't for how "opposed" to it they were.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

Remember that? Outlawz called TUC everything but a red-headed step-child for doing the Strong I exploit in a REGULAR SEASON GAME. Looks like Outlawz showed his true colors today. Pretty disappointed to see him do that actually.

Someone said that winning that way would feel better than losing that way. I disagree. Now that I speak from experience, I'd much rather have lost a game like that, than won a game like that.


You ran the ball 47 times. 8 of those 47 runs were out of the I formation. Take a guess what the other 39 were out of?? You guys used the same exploit.

The reason you lost is because you had to settle for FGs instead of TDs when you got in scoring position. Also because your kick coverage was terrible and you got unlucky with one turnover.

I can understand your frustration but the Strong I is not the only reason you lost.

How about we break down the numbers so you can understand them RETARD. You should not come on here saying things that are in no way true. Did we run the strong I play (yes everyone does). Was that the ONLY THING WE DID ON OFFESNE! Hell no. I think the # speak for themselves.

Bugeaters
80 total plays, 47 rush, 33 pass
Strong I Plays 38 rushes, 15 passes
53% of our offense was something other than strong I runs


Angola Douche Bags
54 total plays, 48 rush, 6 pass
Strong I plays 40 rushes, 0 passes
75% of their offense was Strong I runs

We could have lined up and fucking jammed the strong I down their throat like they did to us and like Ghana did to SLS. BuT we didn't.

I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ANY TEAM THAT DOES THIS PERIOD. It is a piss poor way to win and after the fit that they threw after the Lions game I am amazed that they would do the same thing.

Originally posted by ib_mr_ed
Originally posted by Tigerbait0307

Originally posted by majech


Spider Monkeez exploited us. It wouldn't have surprised me, if it weren't for how "opposed" to it they were.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

Remember that? Outlawz called TUC everything but a red-headed step-child for doing the Strong I exploit in a REGULAR SEASON GAME. Looks like Outlawz showed his true colors today. Pretty disappointed to see him do that actually.

Someone said that winning that way would feel better than losing that way. I disagree. Now that I speak from experience, I'd much rather have lost a game like that, than won a game like that.


You ran the ball 47 times. 8 of those 47 runs were out of the I formation. Take a guess what the other 39 were out of?? You guys used the same exploit.

The reason you lost is because you had to settle for FGs instead of TDs when you got in scoring position. Also because your kick coverage was terrible and you got unlucky with one turnover.

I can understand your frustration but the Strong I is not the only reason you lost.

How about we break down the numbers so you can understand them RETARD. You should not come on here saying things that are in no way true. Did we run the strong I play (yes everyone does). Was that the ONLY THING WE DID ON OFFESNE! Hell no. I think the # speak for themselves.

Bugeaters
80 total plays, 47 rush, 33 pass
Strong I Plays 38 rushes, 15 passes
53% of our offense was something other than strong I runs


Angola Douche Bags
54 total plays, 48 rush, 6 pass
Strong I plays 40 rushes, 0 passes
75% of their offense was Strong I runs

We could have lined up and fucking jammed the strong I down their throat like they did to us and like Ghana did to SLS. BuT we didn't.

I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ANY TEAM THAT DOES THIS PERIOD. It is a piss poor way to win and after the fit that they threw after the Lions game I am amazed that they would do the same thing.




So, we only ran two more plays out of the strong I than yourself. Hmmm, seems like something other than the exploit was the reason you lost the game.

Originally posted by rogerdyates
I think had you just said the truth, that it was your only shot, so you did it....Blame Bort. We all would have said yep, your right.

I think we did say it was our best shot:

Originally posted by Lensar

We scouted the hell out of SLS, saw what worked against them and what didn't, based on a game we had against them 4 days ago, and we used that to win


It wasn't necessarily our only shot, but it just so happened that only one play worked consistently enough for what we wanted to do.

And I do blame Bort. That's why I'm not renewing my own team next season and why my players are living off retirement flex.

Originally posted by ib_mr_ed
Originally posted by Tigerbait0307

Originally posted by majech


Spider Monkeez exploited us. It wouldn't have surprised me, if it weren't for how "opposed" to it they were.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

Remember that? Outlawz called TUC everything but a red-headed step-child for doing the Strong I exploit in a REGULAR SEASON GAME. Looks like Outlawz showed his true colors today. Pretty disappointed to see him do that actually.

Someone said that winning that way would feel better than losing that way. I disagree. Now that I speak from experience, I'd much rather have lost a game like that, than won a game like that.


You ran the ball 47 times. 8 of those 47 runs were out of the I formation. Take a guess what the other 39 were out of?? You guys used the same exploit.

The reason you lost is because you had to settle for FGs instead of TDs when you got in scoring position. Also because your kick coverage was terrible and you got unlucky with one turnover.

I can understand your frustration but the Strong I is not the only reason you lost.

How about we break down the numbers so you can understand them RETARD. You should not come on here saying things that are in no way true. Did we run the strong I play (yes everyone does). Was that the ONLY THING WE DID ON OFFESNE! Hell no. I think the # speak for themselves.

Bugeaters
80 total plays, 47 rush, 33 pass
Strong I Plays 38 rushes, 15 passes
53% of our offense was something other than strong I runs


Angola Douche Bags
54 total plays, 48 rush, 6 pass
Strong I plays 40 rushes, 0 passes
75% of their offense was Strong I runs

We could have lined up and fucking jammed the strong I down their throat like they did to us and like Ghana did to SLS. BuT we didn't.

I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ANY TEAM THAT DOES THIS PERIOD. It is a piss poor way to win and after the fit that they threw after the Lions game I am amazed that they would do the same thing.




Exactly!!

Not only do Tiger and Flip have no friggin clue what they are talking about, but they missed the point of my post. The Monkeez owner made a HUGE stick and called TUC names for doing that exploit, then they turn around and do it to us. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

Another thing is that we have ALWAYS been a run heavy team. Pounding the rock is nothing new to us, we've been trying to be run heavy since we first came into the league.

Originally posted by ClemsonJaguar
Originally posted by ib_mr_ed

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307


Originally posted by majech



Spider Monkeez exploited us. It wouldn't have surprised me, if it weren't for how "opposed" to it they were.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

Remember that? Outlawz called TUC everything but a red-headed step-child for doing the Strong I exploit in a REGULAR SEASON GAME. Looks like Outlawz showed his true colors today. Pretty disappointed to see him do that actually.

Someone said that winning that way would feel better than losing that way. I disagree. Now that I speak from experience, I'd much rather have lost a game like that, than won a game like that.


You ran the ball 47 times. 8 of those 47 runs were out of the I formation. Take a guess what the other 39 were out of?? You guys used the same exploit.

The reason you lost is because you had to settle for FGs instead of TDs when you got in scoring position. Also because your kick coverage was terrible and you got unlucky with one turnover.

I can understand your frustration but the Strong I is not the only reason you lost.

How about we break down the numbers so you can understand them RETARD. You should not come on here saying things that are in no way true. Did we run the strong I play (yes everyone does). Was that the ONLY THING WE DID ON OFFESNE! Hell no. I think the # speak for themselves.

Bugeaters
80 total plays, 47 rush, 33 pass
Strong I Plays 38 rushes, 15 passes
53% of our offense was something other than strong I runs


Angola Douche Bags
54 total plays, 48 rush, 6 pass
Strong I plays 40 rushes, 0 passes
75% of their offense was Strong I runs

We could have lined up and fucking jammed the strong I down their throat like they did to us and like Ghana did to SLS. BuT we didn't.

I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ANY TEAM THAT DOES THIS PERIOD. It is a piss poor way to win and after the fit that they threw after the Lions game I am amazed that they would do the same thing.




So, we only ran two more plays out of the strong I than yourself. Hmmm, seems like something other than the exploit was the reason you lost the game.

You CLEARLY don't understand percentages. See we ran 83 plays and you ran 54. We ran a run heavy offense, you ran an exploit offense.

Oh don't forget about this genius....http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2299715

the only reason they ran anything else or threw the ball was because they were loosing!

Just so I know, what is the magical % that determines if you are guilty of using an exploit?