You didn't get screwed when 15 out of your 22 trades "Went Sour" some how? If the people who you "know" treat you this way, I would hate to see what your enemies must be like.
I can relate to your other explanation better. If you would have just come out and said that when the issue of Helsinki starting with more money than everyone else,came up, I think it would have been a much easier pill to swallow.
However your continued evasiveness, and the unlikeliness of 15 out of 22 trades for max cash, "just not working out", makes the situation look very much like you knew that they money would give an advantage to the teams you sent it to, and that you had no real intention of keeping the players you traded for. I wonder what the players that you cut would say about how it all went down? Would they say "I was really excited when I asked to be traded to Springfield, but when I got there, it wasn't as fun as I expected" Or would they say something closer to "I woke up one day and I was traded to Springfield, then I got cut with no explanation?" Are you going to challenge me to contact them and ask?
Do you notice a pattern here? Every time you give an explanation other than "Yes, we bought players from Helsinki for the express purpose of giving them more money to start their season with." I then dig a little deeper into your financial transactions, and find things that make what you say seem not so earnest.
I don't consider it as getting screwed because I initiated the deal. Everyone has equipment, the stadium is built for the most part, and we took a chance with the extra cash we had.