User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Europe East AA Leagues > Europe East AA #1 > Eastern Europe AA#1 all new rankings!
Page:
 
bongbreath
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
how are the ones in your conference better...because you play them? i just don't get it.


Check your next 4 games, go ahead and compare them with any team in our league and please include our first year team, they are worse, in fact much worse.

I didn't bother looking at any others, I'm not sure any more research was even remotely neccessary.

I'm not hating on you for the schedule, enjoy the easy route you have to the playoffs because without question you will make it.

But don't come at me with how tough it is over there, it's a cake walk, I know it and you know it. Man up and admit it.

I'm from Krakow, I'll be the first to admit we haven't won anything or deserve any credit. We were bottom feeders last year and until we win something of substance we don't deserve any ranking or consideration from anyone.

We have a group of guys that got sick of losing, thats all we have. How far that takes us is up to the GLB football gods.





 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
lmao...what did u just read my post and retaliate...or do you actually read the posts before it....and yes ur next 3 of 4 opponents...anyone can win...our next 4 are not in their league...but then look at your next 4 after them....all against teams equivalent to our first 4...then look at our schedule yeah easier next 4...but then the last 3 of 4 is well worthy of being great games...so both teams have the same exact difficulty of teams...not 1 better then the other...everyone plays the same schedule...both divisions are the same...not 1 better then the other...both have their strong teams...and their weaker teams...and it's not about consideration...it's the fact zeta keeps being refered to as the weak division...when in fact i don't see that at all....so maybe you should have did your research....and checked the schedules out at the end of the year...as we play one of your divsion's best in our last game....and that's after 2 tough opponents in our division...so our last 3 of 4 is equivalent to your next 3 after this next game.....and is nothing wrong with wanting to win.

and after your top 5...which is the same as our top 5...you have mma at 7 who is a tough opponent...other than that is difference between the two leagues...so you can sit here and say our division is a cakewalk all you want...but your division is no different...it's just you notice yours a little bit more because that's the one you play in...if you played over here...your opinion would be different...i am saying they are both the same...they have their top tier and their lower tier.
Last edited May 11, 2008 08:48:06
 
bongbreath
offline
Link
 
Well one thing is ceratin, who ever comes out of both league are going to be very good ballclubs and deserving to represent their conference.

I'm not debating or slamming anyone on either side as far as "greatness"

Are we great? Once again, we haven't earned any distinction one way or the other. But we are a close group that wants to one day be considered such.

Thats a start, and one I will happily accept for now.



 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
you guys are definately a contender on that side...i think regardless of who you played your record proves it...and yes you have played some good teams...and you have some tough ones coming up...although your last 3 before the last game are ah i would say a easier stretch...as we have had a fairly easy only playing 2 top teams in our stretch...our last 4 are gonna be tough...considering we get to play...stewart...hoplites and your conference's hippos...i would say we have it hard at the end...all i trying to say is i don't think 1 conference is better then the other..they both have their flaws and upsides...so for greg to say we have a weak conference...well my point has been i just don't see it...
 
bombizzy
offline
Link
 
i seriously have to laugh at all you....especially GREG

Including Devin as well
Last edited May 11, 2008 12:25:39
 
nothere
offline
Link
 
I guess the only way to really see which conference is better will be the head-to-head record during the final week. To Odesa, I wasn't saying that you are bad owners or GM's, I was merely stating the obvious fact that it is harder to put together a team in the 3(?) days prior to a season starting and during the season when you will take chemistry hits then it is during a full season, postseason, off season, and then early season that some of the older teams had. Both of the Odesa's have exceeded expectations and done well, but some of the older teams you beat have got some real depth issues, their starters look decent but after that there are many CPU's and level 7 & under. You guys have done really well, and I expect next year after you have an offseason to refine your roster you will be one of the top tier teams.
Last edited May 11, 2008 12:37:34
 
Romulan
offline
Link
 
We are playing the Odessa team this time and although Hellas knew early on that this team means business the upset against stewart was even more reason for us to take them very very seriously.

Its nice to see so many committed owners in both the Alpha and Zeta divisions, look forward to the playoffs.
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.
 
Ender922
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.



I'm going to enjoy watching you lose to a Zeta conference team.

There are several teams in Zeta that is better than the team you are about to play.
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ender922
Originally posted by greg420

the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.



I'm going to enjoy watching you lose to a Zeta conference team.

There are several teams in Zeta that is better than the team you are about to play.


when I go down the list of starters on each team they are pretty close.
 
Ender922
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
Originally posted by Ender922

Originally posted by greg420


the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.



I'm going to enjoy watching you lose to a Zeta conference team.

There are several teams in Zeta that is better than the team you are about to play.


when I go down the list of starters on each team they are pretty close.


Yeah... their starters. Go down their entire roster and you see a lot of inactives and probably more than half of their team is between levels 5 and 10

 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.


lmao....i am not even gonna bother with that shi...you do nothing but make me laugh...that's all i got to say...u talk alot of garbage..

your team you are playing...have won 4 games....of those 4...the teams are 2-30....lmao you kidding me right.


like i said before...the stat sheets explain it all...and we run the board on them...offensively and defensively...so until you prove better than that...i don't give a shi who is in what conference...when we are taken off that list...come talk to me.
Last edited May 11, 2008 20:31:56
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ender922
Originally posted by greg420

Originally posted by Ender922


Originally posted by greg420



the 4-4 team were about to play probably has more talant then ALL your teams in the zeta conference. All teams.



I'm going to enjoy watching you lose to a Zeta conference team.

There are several teams in Zeta that is better than the team you are about to play.


when I go down the list of starters on each team they are pretty close.


Yeah... their starters. Go down their entire roster and you see a lot of inactives and probably more than half of their team is between levels 5 and 10



and he does know that the starters don't play the entire game right...subs have to come in sooner or later...he also knows that just because a team looks good on paper or a player looks good cuz his lvl...doesn't mean shi...you can be lvl 16...and be horrible...i'll be looking forward to your next set of games coming up after your next one...let's see if you make it through those...and how much mouth running you'll be doing...you better hope you win.
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
wow your getting really defensive, im just saying looking at there starters they have alot higher levels than your teams. if they were in yalls division I bet they would be at least 6-2.

stats are irrelevent when your racking them up against really bad teams. and you know that in the back of your head and why you refuse to admit it is beyond me.

 
Romulan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
wow your getting really defensive, im just saying looking at there starters they have alot higher levels than your teams. if they were in yalls division I bet they would be at least 6-2.

stats are irrelevent when your racking them up against really bad teams. and you know that in the back of your head and why you refuse to admit it is beyond me.




Im sure you dont speak for Krakaw since your just a player not their owner or a GM, but if you really feel that zeta teams are that bad, its going to be even more fun when one of our teams wins the Conference at the end of this season.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.