There's was a shooter on the grassy knoll that shot a plane into the South Tower. Find your grassy knoll plane shooter and you will have unlocked the mystery.
Forum > General Discussion > Politics and Religion > Watch the video... then call me a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
Originally posted by seths99
IGNORANCE (is equating a fire in a building with structural damage from a plane crashing into it, to a fire in a building that did not suffer the same type of damage. seriously, it shows you just how 'scientific' these tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist nutfucks really are)
But to quote that eloquent graphic "Windsor still stand, WTC fail to fire and heat"
It's hard to argue with that.
IGNORANCE (is equating a fire in a building with structural damage from a plane crashing into it, to a fire in a building that did not suffer the same type of damage. seriously, it shows you just how 'scientific' these tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist nutfucks really are)
But to quote that eloquent graphic "Windsor still stand, WTC fail to fire and heat"
It's hard to argue with that.
Also one more thing that hampers my ability to believe in a conspiracy on this scale: No one involved has said a thing. The NSA can't even think about reading an email without two whistleblowers, 13 national news stories, and 3 congressional hearings, how in the hell did the government get absolutely every single one of the thousands of people it would take to do this silent?
Originally posted by rams78110
Also one more thing that hampers my ability to believe in a conspiracy on this scale: No one involved has said a thing. The NSA can't even think about reading an email without two whistleblowers, 13 national news stories, and 3 congressional hearings, how in the hell did the government get absolutely every single one of the thousands of people it would take to do this silent?
Were you in on it? You know how many it took, so you must have been.
Also one more thing that hampers my ability to believe in a conspiracy on this scale: No one involved has said a thing. The NSA can't even think about reading an email without two whistleblowers, 13 national news stories, and 3 congressional hearings, how in the hell did the government get absolutely every single one of the thousands of people it would take to do this silent?
Were you in on it? You know how many it took, so you must have been.
Originally posted by rams78110
Oh the spanish building had a plane hit it too?
WTC 7 did... amirite?
Oh the spanish building had a plane hit it too?
WTC 7 did... amirite?
Originally posted by rams78110
Originally posted by rams78110
"There is endless photographic evidence" *links zero photographs*
Still waiting buddy
Originally posted by rams78110
"There is endless photographic evidence" *links zero photographs*
Still waiting buddy
Baum... You don't believe any witness that conflicts with the official story, right?
Why do you even debate this topic? I could understand the smell of kerosene making it to the lobby... not the fireball. You refuse to see how that could not have happened.
An explosion in the elevator shaft happens.
It could not have been anything but jet fuel traveling 800 ft and then igniting, even though you claim it blew open every other door on the way down, which means it was already ignited... Oops... someone forgot their own story!
and this bullshit story!
Originally posted by your witness story
All of the oxygen was sucked out of the building and my lungs (like being in a vacuum)bullshit!
Originally posted by bs again
It progressed down the building, breaking the windows as it wentno they didn't! Unless this asshole is saying that it broke the windows only in the lobby and not on all of the rest of the floors where it broke out the elevator doors. There is absolutely no evidence of windows breaking all the way down the building! Why do you quote these morons?
Originally posted by rukidding?
I concluded later in the day that this was from the huge airplane fireball nice scientific approach there. Chick concluded later that it was fuel... nice! She is a total expert
That story is not usable... she is trying to embellish so much that her story is completely unbelievable. It sounds like she is trying to get a publisher for her book chronicling the day, rather than give a true account of what happened.
Anyway... I get it. I am enough of a grown up to say that there is a possibility of a plane hitting the pentagon because of the 87 witnesses who say they saw something hit, and the 23 who say it was an airplane. You are so narrow minded and wrapped up in pushing the government story that you refuse to believe even 1 witness to the contrary.
If anything, you are an intellectual coward. And as for larry... You are the epitome of idiocy! You do realize that you still have contributed zero to this or any conversation, right? It must be intentional, or you are an actual, lives under a bridge, eats hobbits, fucking troll!
Why do you even debate this topic? I could understand the smell of kerosene making it to the lobby... not the fireball. You refuse to see how that could not have happened.
An explosion in the elevator shaft happens.
It could not have been anything but jet fuel traveling 800 ft and then igniting, even though you claim it blew open every other door on the way down, which means it was already ignited... Oops... someone forgot their own story!
and this bullshit story!
Originally posted by your witness story
All of the oxygen was sucked out of the building and my lungs (like being in a vacuum)bullshit!
Originally posted by bs again
It progressed down the building, breaking the windows as it wentno they didn't! Unless this asshole is saying that it broke the windows only in the lobby and not on all of the rest of the floors where it broke out the elevator doors. There is absolutely no evidence of windows breaking all the way down the building! Why do you quote these morons?
Originally posted by rukidding?
I concluded later in the day that this was from the huge airplane fireball nice scientific approach there. Chick concluded later that it was fuel... nice! She is a total expert
That story is not usable... she is trying to embellish so much that her story is completely unbelievable. It sounds like she is trying to get a publisher for her book chronicling the day, rather than give a true account of what happened.
Anyway... I get it. I am enough of a grown up to say that there is a possibility of a plane hitting the pentagon because of the 87 witnesses who say they saw something hit, and the 23 who say it was an airplane. You are so narrow minded and wrapped up in pushing the government story that you refuse to believe even 1 witness to the contrary.
If anything, you are an intellectual coward. And as for larry... You are the epitome of idiocy! You do realize that you still have contributed zero to this or any conversation, right? It must be intentional, or you are an actual, lives under a bridge, eats hobbits, fucking troll!
Originally posted by rams78110
Still waiting buddy
For the part where you said there was photographic evidence? Shouldn't you be putting that up?
Still waiting buddy
For the part where you said there was photographic evidence? Shouldn't you be putting that up?
Originally posted by rams78110
"There is endless photographic evidence" *links zero photographs*
from page 56... this was your quote... are you expecting me to have pictures that nobody else has or something? You also are a moron
"There is endless photographic evidence" *links zero photographs*
from page 56... this was your quote... are you expecting me to have pictures that nobody else has or something? You also are a moron
I think I found what you're trying to sayOriginally posted by me from cited source
Incendiary explosions in the lobby and in the basement levels accompanied the destruction of the North Tower of the World Trade Center (WTC). The evidence for these incendiary explosions is significant and includes numerous eyewitness testimonies and photographic evidence. The official, government investigation conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) did not address these phenomena in any meaningful way and offered only a weak suggestion that is demonstrably false. that is from this source
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-cover-up-jet-fuel-caused-the-incendiary-explosions-in-the-wtc-lobby/5358433
the source was cited in my post. Go ahead and review their article and look for what they posted as evidence. And don't forget to fuck off, moron!
Incendiary explosions in the lobby and in the basement levels accompanied the destruction of the North Tower of the World Trade Center (WTC). The evidence for these incendiary explosions is significant and includes numerous eyewitness testimonies and photographic evidence. The official, government investigation conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) did not address these phenomena in any meaningful way and offered only a weak suggestion that is demonstrably false. that is from this source
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-cover-up-jet-fuel-caused-the-incendiary-explosions-in-the-wtc-lobby/5358433
the source was cited in my post. Go ahead and review their article and look for what they posted as evidence. And don't forget to fuck off, moron!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvUIQZ7t7Ak That page links this video (which I already posted earlier). It's interesting that there is nothing on fire, or charred considering the size a fireball + jet fuel would need to be to not only blow apart elevator doors but destroy marble tiles on the wall and blow out all of the windows(let's remember that these are not easily broken windows)
Father of one of the first 10 to die at the towers. Have enough respect to at least listen to him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGdt3KCIlCE
witness to explosions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1HlV9O65w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGdt3KCIlCE
witness to explosions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1HlV9O65w
Edited by wormser1971 on Nov 27, 2013 20:19:36
"There are endless pictures of explosions proving its a bomb. What, you expect me to have pictures? You're an idiot."
Lol well played wormy.
Lol well played wormy.
And that is terrible for the father. But a grief-wrought person isn't usually the most impartial or clear. I don't trust people. I want to see images.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.