37 Cleveland Browns +1
54 Green Bay Packers
57 Carolina Panthers -1
54 Green Bay Packers
57 Carolina Panthers -1
sully
offline
offline
36 Cleveland Browns
54 Green Bay Packers -1
58 Carolina Panthers +1
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
54 Green Bay Packers -1
58 Carolina Panthers +1
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
Ephraim
offline
offline
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
sully
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
Ephraim
offline
offline
Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
-1
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
-1
sully
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
-1
And I get $500 for knowing that would be your response immediately after mine. Yay for gambling!
Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by Ephraim
Originally posted by sully
I would think at this point, the voting for the same team in consecutive posts plan is off the docket, as it is impossible to post without voting (+ or -) for one team consecutively.
+1
Oh, and you all suck for voting off the Vikings.
-1
And I get $500 for knowing that would be your response immediately after mine. Yay for gambling!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
